There seems to be a growing shift from Human Resource Management to Human Capital Management. Good people, what is the major difference between the two approaches to people management in an organization? I would be most grateful for your insight on these.

Regards,
Okumu wa Oyiengo

From Kenya, Nairobi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Earlier days, there were not many business players, and proportionately, jobs were scarce. During those times, employers did not focus much on employees; they simply paid according to the number of days worked. Employers were primarily concerned with salaries, which was known as personnel management.

In later stages, several Acts were implemented to safeguard employees' rights and values, leading to a more sensitive and critical approach in human resources. With the increase in the number of employers, people started receiving better job offers. Consequently, employers began to pay more attention to employees' welfare, health, safety, and development activities such as training to assess employee performance through performance management (PM) systems. All these aspects combined to make personnel management more crucial and sensitive in an organization's development, transforming it into what we now refer to as HR. The role of HR has become more sensitive, focusing on human capital management.

From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.