Dear Friends I Have attached training plan V/s Achievements format In short Training Gap analysis
From India, Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Dear friend,
I have gone through your attached paper. My observations are as below:
a) Gap Analysis is for measuring the gap in knowledge and skills of the employees and not in the execution of the training plan or any plan for that matter.
b) KRA for the training department is to conduct ____ hours of training per month. Suppose every employee should be trained for 2 hours per month. This makes 24 hours a year. The Training Department can arrange 1 day training three times or 1 day + 2-day training once or 3-day training also once.
c) Your attached paper says that you should have conducted 9 training programs where actually only 6 could be conducted. Then how come the entire training budget is exhausted? Is this not an excess consumption of budgetary allocations?
d) In the second paragraph, you have used the phrase "number of participants invited". Rather it should read as "number of participants nominated". The training department need not "invite" any employee to attend the training program.
e) Your paper does not make mention of a category-wise break-up of training program(s) - technical, non-technical, and fire and safety.
f) Your paper does not mention the breakup of the funds spent for each training program.
g) Your paper does not mention the breakup of designation-wise training.
h) Your paper does not mention the post-training effects of the training. Whether operational efficiency was increased after training? This question is not answered.
For info.
Dinesh V Divekar
From India, Bangalore
I have gone through your attached paper. My observations are as below:
a) Gap Analysis is for measuring the gap in knowledge and skills of the employees and not in the execution of the training plan or any plan for that matter.
b) KRA for the training department is to conduct ____ hours of training per month. Suppose every employee should be trained for 2 hours per month. This makes 24 hours a year. The Training Department can arrange 1 day training three times or 1 day + 2-day training once or 3-day training also once.
c) Your attached paper says that you should have conducted 9 training programs where actually only 6 could be conducted. Then how come the entire training budget is exhausted? Is this not an excess consumption of budgetary allocations?
d) In the second paragraph, you have used the phrase "number of participants invited". Rather it should read as "number of participants nominated". The training department need not "invite" any employee to attend the training program.
e) Your paper does not make mention of a category-wise break-up of training program(s) - technical, non-technical, and fire and safety.
f) Your paper does not mention the breakup of the funds spent for each training program.
g) Your paper does not mention the breakup of designation-wise training.
h) Your paper does not mention the post-training effects of the training. Whether operational efficiency was increased after training? This question is not answered.
For info.
Dinesh V Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Gathering data for an AI comment.... Sending emails to relevant members...
Join Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.