No Tags Found!


dheeraj2002
I have lodges a case under payment of wages act 1936 against my previous company as they had not paid me any salary for more than a year. We have filed all the relevant documents. Now the company has said that since our salary was more than 18000, so our case should be rejected , as under section 1(6) it was mentioned that salary should be less than 1800. The same section has been omitted in September 2016, and we have filed the case after December 2016. and time duration of my job was February 2014 to June 2016.
IS there any point, which I can put in my appeal that the case should be continued. If the section1(6) has been omitted, then everyone is free to apply , hence my case should be continued.
Is their judgement favoring my case. I am getting harrased for my money

From India, New Delhi
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf KM_206_05035.pdf (361.7 KB, 24 views)

bharath_ns@hotmail.com
I have lodges a case under payment of wages act 1936 against the employer as they had not paid my sales promotion incentives for more than 5 years and they made illegal deduction from salary without any reason for the past two years. I have filed all the relevant documents. Now the company has said that since our salary was more than 18000, so our case should be rejected , as under section 1(6).
Is there any point, which I can put in my appeal that the case should be continued. If the section1(6) has been omitted, then everyone is free to apply , hence my case should be continued.
Is their judgement favoring my case.

From India, Coonoor
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.