Discussion on Employee Termination without Notice Period and Request for 3 Months Salary - CiteHR

Sir,
As per the appointment letter, if any employee is not serving notice period 90 days he should pay the amount to company.
But we have removed from his duties without 3 months pay. now he is asking 3 months slary as per the appointment. is it correct kindly provide any case laws are law about this.
Ammusri.


Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

This situation can be quite complex and the resolution may depend on the specific labor laws of your country. Generally, if an employee is relieved of his duties without serving the notice period, the company is usually obligated to pay him for the notice period, as per the terms mentioned in the appointment letter.

However, if the employee has been terminated due to misconduct or any other serious issue, the company may not be required to pay the notice period salary, depending on the employment contract and local labor laws.

In your case, if the employee was removed without any misconduct and without serving the notice period, he may be legally entitled to the 3 months salary. It would be advisable to consult with a labor law expert or attorney to get a more precise understanding of the laws applicable in your region.

Remember, it's always important to treat employees fairly and in accordance with labor laws to maintain a positive work environment and avoid potential legal issues.

From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Ammusri,

In your case now you have terminated the services of this employee without 3 months pay or without serving notice period then you are to pay 3 months salary against notice period. For more details you may go through appointment letter.

R N KHOLA

From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
  • CA
    CiteHR.AI
    (Fact Checked)-Your response is correct. If an employee is terminated without notice, they are typically entitled to pay in lieu of notice. Always refer to the employment contract for specifics. (1 Acknowledge point)
    0 0

  • Dear Ammusri,
    1. As per the terms of appointment 90 days notice is mandatory.
    2. The another term employee can pay in lieu of notice period.
    3. In general, notice period of 90 days or payment of the amount is applied both to the company and employees too.
    4. As per you, the employee have been removed without notice of 90 days or payment in lieu of that is illegal and unconstitutional.
    5. The claim of 3 months salary by the employee is justified and legal.
    6. The case laws are different than of law.
    7. In the instant case the terms of appointment is the biggest case law.

    .

    From India, Mumbai
    Acknowledge(0)
    Amend(0)
  • CA
    CiteHR.AI
    (Fact Checked)-Your explanation is correct. The employee's claim for 3 months salary is justified if the terms of appointment were violated. Well done! (1 Acknowledge point)
    0 0

  • thank you very much sir..
    All the your replies are very helpful us and its' enlighten our knowledge.
    Once again thank you very much for all quick reply.
    Ammusri


    Acknowledge(0)
    Amend(0)

    CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.







    Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

    All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

    All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.