I joined a company in 2021 without disclosing that I had absconded from a previous job. At that time, the company didn't check service history through the UAN portal, so they were unaware of my absconding. Now that I'm on the bench and may be assigned to another project, I'm concerned about whether the company will conduct a thorough background verification (BGV) using the UAN service history when I switch projects. Can anyone share their insights on this?
From India, Delhi
From India, Delhi
In India, the Universal Account Number (UAN) is a crucial tool for tracking an employee's provident fund contributions and service history. When it comes to background verification during project transitions, companies may indeed utilize the UAN service history to verify an employee's past employment details, including any instances of absconding.
Insights on Background Verification Using UAN Service History
- Likelihood of UAN Service History Check: Given that the UAN service history provides a comprehensive record of an employee's previous employments, including reasons for exit, there is a high probability that your current company might conduct a background verification using this tool when you switch projects.
- Legal Implications: From a legal standpoint, companies have the right to verify the authenticity of an employee's past employment details to ensure transparency and integrity in their workforce. Failure to disclose relevant information, such as absconding from a previous job, could lead to disciplinary actions or termination based on the company's policies.
- Practical Steps to Take:
- Self-Disclosure: It is advisable to proactively disclose any discrepancies or past issues, such as absconding, to your HR department before they initiate a background verification process. Being transparent about your past can demonstrate integrity and a willingness to rectify any past mistakes.
- Seek Guidance: If you are uncertain about how your past absconding may impact your current employment, consider seeking guidance from HR or a legal advisor to understand the potential consequences and explore ways to address the situation professionally.
- Consequences of Non-Disclosure: Non-disclosure of critical information like absconding can erode trust between the employer and the employee, potentially leading to reputational damage and career setbacks. It is essential to address such issues transparently to maintain a positive professional relationship.
- Final Recommendation: To navigate this situation effectively, consider initiating a candid conversation with your HR representative to discuss your concerns and seek clarity on the company's background verification procedures. By being proactive and transparent, you can demonstrate accountability and a commitment to ethical conduct in the workplace.
By addressing the issue transparently and seeking guidance where necessary, you can navigate the background verification process with professionalism and integrity, mitigating any potential risks associated with past discrepancies.
From India, Gurugram
Insights on Background Verification Using UAN Service History
- Likelihood of UAN Service History Check: Given that the UAN service history provides a comprehensive record of an employee's previous employments, including reasons for exit, there is a high probability that your current company might conduct a background verification using this tool when you switch projects.
- Legal Implications: From a legal standpoint, companies have the right to verify the authenticity of an employee's past employment details to ensure transparency and integrity in their workforce. Failure to disclose relevant information, such as absconding from a previous job, could lead to disciplinary actions or termination based on the company's policies.
- Practical Steps to Take:
- Self-Disclosure: It is advisable to proactively disclose any discrepancies or past issues, such as absconding, to your HR department before they initiate a background verification process. Being transparent about your past can demonstrate integrity and a willingness to rectify any past mistakes.
- Seek Guidance: If you are uncertain about how your past absconding may impact your current employment, consider seeking guidance from HR or a legal advisor to understand the potential consequences and explore ways to address the situation professionally.
- Consequences of Non-Disclosure: Non-disclosure of critical information like absconding can erode trust between the employer and the employee, potentially leading to reputational damage and career setbacks. It is essential to address such issues transparently to maintain a positive professional relationship.
- Final Recommendation: To navigate this situation effectively, consider initiating a candid conversation with your HR representative to discuss your concerns and seek clarity on the company's background verification procedures. By being proactive and transparent, you can demonstrate accountability and a commitment to ethical conduct in the workplace.
By addressing the issue transparently and seeking guidance where necessary, you can navigate the background verification process with professionalism and integrity, mitigating any potential risks associated with past discrepancies.
From India, Gurugram
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.