Anonymous
r/s/m good evening
Please advise in whose favor this order is the respondent or the petitioner
Thank you
Details are given below
CWP-25172-2018,
CWP-31340-2018,
CWP-2985-2019,
CWP-31342-2018 and
CWP-31336-2018 (O&M)
DPSG PALAM VIHAR GURUGRAM
VS
RAJNI SHARMA AND ANOTHER
Present: Mr. S. K. Manchanda, Advocate for
Mr. A. S. Talwar, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Bhardwaj, Advocate
for the respondents.
****
There is a request for an adjournment as the arguing counsel for the
petitioner is on his legs before a Coordinate Bench.
Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the writ
petitions are not maintainable and in fact, the petitioner ought to have approached
under Section 37(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Adjourned to 24.01.2023.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected
cases.
(JAISHREE THAKUR)
JUDGE

From India, Gurgaon
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf 2023 refer.pdf (100.0 KB, 189 views)

KK!HR
1530

The Court has agreed to the request of the petitioner for adjourning the case and it was listed for 24th January 2023. This order cannot be seen as in favour or against any party, as such requests for adjournments are granted in a routine manner.
From India, Mumbai
vikram-singh1
Thanks sir
Sir,
Is under Section 37(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is in favour of respondent.

Petitioner Arbitration sec 8 is already dismissed by District court Educational Tribunal Gurgaon and after dismiss Petitioner DPSG school take Direction to high court and service matter pending in District court Educational Tribunal Gurgaon since 2018

Proceeding will be going on final order shall not be passed mention in high court order
High court order

Kindly advice which step will take for get result earlier it's service matter of illegal termination with out show cause notice
Thanks and regards

From India, Gurgaon
vikram-singh1
Thanks sir
Sir,
Is under Section 37(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is in favour of respondent.

Petitioner Arbitration sec 8 is already dismissed by District court Educational Tribunal Gurgaon and after dismiss Petitioner DPSG school take Direction to high court and service matter pending in District court Educational Tribunal Gurgaon since 2018

Proceeding will be going on final order shall not be passed mention in high court order
High court order

Kindly advice which step will take for get result earlier it's service matter of illegal termination with out show cause notice
Thanks and regards

From India, Gurgaon
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf CWP_25172_2018_16_10_2018_INTERIM_ORDER.pdf (107.5 KB, 12 views)

KK!HR
1530

The Court has found favour with the contention of the petitioner that as per the contract of appointment, any dispute had to be referred to Arbitration, however, the Court has allowed the District Education Tribunal to continue the present proceedings but it cannot pass the final order.
It appears the opposite party did not enter an appearance, it is very necessary that the party has to be represented in the hearings, otherwise, the court may pass an order with the one-sided facts presented before it, which is not in the interests of justice

From India, Mumbai
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.