An employee died during his LOP. He was critically ill. Can it be updated in PF portal as "Death in Service". What about his Benefits from PF (EDLI/Pension)
From India, Hyderabad
From India, Hyderabad
Understanding Leave of Absence (LOP) and PF Records
LOP does not mean that the employee was not in service. It is only an arrangement for leave when the employee falls short of paid leave. If the date of exit shown in the PF records is after the date of death, the dependents of the deceased employee will receive all the benefits like EDLI and Pension.
Important Considerations for PF Exit Date
Therefore, do not put the date just after the date of death as the date of exit. Please remember that if you put even the same date of death, the application for EDLI will be rejected, stating that the death occurred not while in service but after the exit from service. Therefore, put the date succeeding the date of death as the exit date.
From India, Kannur
LOP does not mean that the employee was not in service. It is only an arrangement for leave when the employee falls short of paid leave. If the date of exit shown in the PF records is after the date of death, the dependents of the deceased employee will receive all the benefits like EDLI and Pension.
Important Considerations for PF Exit Date
Therefore, do not put the date just after the date of death as the date of exit. Please remember that if you put even the same date of death, the application for EDLI will be rejected, stating that the death occurred not while in service but after the exit from service. Therefore, put the date succeeding the date of death as the exit date.
From India, Kannur
Thanks Madhu. So if the date of death is on 5th Sep 2023 then DOE should be put 6th Sep 2023.
From India, Hyderabad
From India, Hyderabad
Hi, DOE should be 5th Sep,2023 only. When the employee is deceased on 5th Sep,2023 itself how come you remove by the closing hours of 6th Sep,2023?
From India, Madras
From India, Madras
If you mark the exit on 5th Sept, the EPF will definitely reject the claim for EDLI, saying that death did not occur while in service. It is appropriate in the case of an employee joining another organization on the date immediately following the exit from the previous company, but in the event of death, it should be the date following the date of death. I have had a lot of correspondence with EPFO regarding this matter from my past experience. That is why I am suggesting never to input the same date of exit in cases of death.
From India, Kannur
From India, Kannur
Mr. Madhu,
I don't think 6.9.23 will be appropriate. The employment contract between the employer and employee ends on the date of the employee's death. In such a situation, how can the last working day (LWD) be after the death date? We have processed a few claims where the LWD was marked to match the death date of the employee only.
From India, Madras
I don't think 6.9.23 will be appropriate. The employment contract between the employer and employee ends on the date of the employee's death. In such a situation, how can the last working day (LWD) be after the death date? We have processed a few claims where the LWD was marked to match the death date of the employee only.
From India, Madras
Mr. Lakshmi Narayanan,
This is because the death may occur after working hours, i.e., after the last working day, or after the employee has been marked as exited. In the case of an employee joining another organization the following day, it is true that we should set the last working day as the exit day. However, in all other cases, it is safer to put the next day as the date of exit. If you are confident, you can set the date of death as the date of exit and then engage in numerous correspondences to prove that the employee was in service until the date of death. Immediately upon hearing the news of his death, we exited him, without delving into the details that a day means 24 hours starting from midnight at 12:01 and ending at midnight at 12:00, etc. Until the time of death, we had a legal contract with the employee, and since the death occurred during the day, say at 11 am, he would cease to be an employee after the remaining hours of the day. Therefore, his death could only be considered as death while in service, etc.
Akheel, I have provided a practical solution from my own experience. You may keep the marking of exit pending, seek proper advice, and act accordingly.
From India, Kannur
This is because the death may occur after working hours, i.e., after the last working day, or after the employee has been marked as exited. In the case of an employee joining another organization the following day, it is true that we should set the last working day as the exit day. However, in all other cases, it is safer to put the next day as the date of exit. If you are confident, you can set the date of death as the date of exit and then engage in numerous correspondences to prove that the employee was in service until the date of death. Immediately upon hearing the news of his death, we exited him, without delving into the details that a day means 24 hours starting from midnight at 12:01 and ending at midnight at 12:00, etc. Until the time of death, we had a legal contract with the employee, and since the death occurred during the day, say at 11 am, he would cease to be an employee after the remaining hours of the day. Therefore, his death could only be considered as death while in service, etc.
Akheel, I have provided a practical solution from my own experience. You may keep the marking of exit pending, seek proper advice, and act accordingly.
From India, Kannur
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.