Hi All,
I am associated with a firm that is working on government projects. We have to hire contractors for the work to be done at various sites, and the contractors, for their convenience, engage daily wage workers at the concerned sites without deducting PF and ESIC from the daily wage employees.
So, my questions are:
1. Are the daily wage workers also covered under the CLRA Act?
2. Should the contractor deduct PF and ESIC from the daily wage workers or not?
3. Are we liable to overlook the compliance fulfillment of subcontractors?
From India, Delhi
I am associated with a firm that is working on government projects. We have to hire contractors for the work to be done at various sites, and the contractors, for their convenience, engage daily wage workers at the concerned sites without deducting PF and ESIC from the daily wage employees.
So, my questions are:
1. Are the daily wage workers also covered under the CLRA Act?
2. Should the contractor deduct PF and ESIC from the daily wage workers or not?
3. Are we liable to overlook the compliance fulfillment of subcontractors?
From India, Delhi
I also deal with such cases, but our sub-contractor don't hire workers on daily wages. In our industry we prefer to hire permanent employee under sub-contractor's scope. If the nature of work is hazardous or risk inherent I would suggest to engage such sub-contractors who can deploy permanent employees and can comply all statutory benefits. May be due to cost reduction or making margins the contractor is engaging daily wages worker. But as a prime contractor you should avoid such situations.
Pls note my reply:-
1. If you have considered those Nos in your / contractor’s Labour Licence than such workers must be covered under CLRA and need to consider their detail in Half Yearly Labour Return / Annual Return under Shram Suvidha.
2. As per my opinion though primarily deducting PF-ESI is depend whether the sub-contractor is covered under PF-ESI or not. If covered, than those deduction are must. But if not covered than you must take an indeminity bond from the sub-contracotr duly stating if in future (even after contract closure) any liability arises due to PF-ESI or such compliance than the sub-contractor will be solely responsible for the same. As stated above if the work is risk inherent activities, ask the sub-contractor to take EC Policy for required No. of personnel deployed at site. By doing so, if any worker met with accident which lead to Death or Disability, he will get compensation from the Insurance Company / Compensation Board. Otherwise it will lead to huge cost to you and to the sub-contractor.
3. You can’t escape by overlooking the compliance fulfillment. Being prime contractor you will be responsible for all activities of your sub-contractor/s. In govt projects, they defined hard terms in the agreement, but don’t focus so much. But in case of any happening put all the pressure of us (Prime Contractor). So we need to be more focused while engaging any sub-contractor.
Additionally I would advice, first check whether the complaince cost (PF-ESI, Bonus, Leave, Gratuity etc.) have been included in the WO value (Agreement issued to the sub-contractor). If so, than you are in double loss. If such cost not considered take your management call whether to include such cost and make strict compliance. If they don’t want to increase cost and avoid complaince level than in long run it can be harmful.
I have given detailed reply of your short query. That is due to my personal experiences.
Seniors can throw more light on the matter.
From India, Delhi
Pls note my reply:-
1. If you have considered those Nos in your / contractor’s Labour Licence than such workers must be covered under CLRA and need to consider their detail in Half Yearly Labour Return / Annual Return under Shram Suvidha.
2. As per my opinion though primarily deducting PF-ESI is depend whether the sub-contractor is covered under PF-ESI or not. If covered, than those deduction are must. But if not covered than you must take an indeminity bond from the sub-contracotr duly stating if in future (even after contract closure) any liability arises due to PF-ESI or such compliance than the sub-contractor will be solely responsible for the same. As stated above if the work is risk inherent activities, ask the sub-contractor to take EC Policy for required No. of personnel deployed at site. By doing so, if any worker met with accident which lead to Death or Disability, he will get compensation from the Insurance Company / Compensation Board. Otherwise it will lead to huge cost to you and to the sub-contractor.
3. You can’t escape by overlooking the compliance fulfillment. Being prime contractor you will be responsible for all activities of your sub-contractor/s. In govt projects, they defined hard terms in the agreement, but don’t focus so much. But in case of any happening put all the pressure of us (Prime Contractor). So we need to be more focused while engaging any sub-contractor.
Additionally I would advice, first check whether the complaince cost (PF-ESI, Bonus, Leave, Gratuity etc.) have been included in the WO value (Agreement issued to the sub-contractor). If so, than you are in double loss. If such cost not considered take your management call whether to include such cost and make strict compliance. If they don’t want to increase cost and avoid complaince level than in long run it can be harmful.
I have given detailed reply of your short query. That is due to my personal experiences.
Seniors can throw more light on the matter.
From India, Delhi
Join Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.