#Loss of confidence in employee would justify his dismissal from service. Â Supreme Court 113
#Branch Manager of a bank is not a ‘workman'. Guj. HC 143Â
#Unauthorised habitual absence of workman is a grave misconduct. Â Mad. HC 182
#Authority holding proceeding under S.7A of the EPF Act, will be vested with powers of Civil Court. All. HC 176Â
#Pre-deposit not warranted in an appeal in EPF Tribunal pertaining to damages and interests. Â Del. HC 133Â
#EPF Authority's order without identification of beneficiaries not sustainable.Gau. HC 201Â
#Probation period can't be enhanced beyond six months as stipulated by Model Standing Orders. Bom. HC 209
#Unintentional delay in deposit of EPF contributions will justify waiver of damages.P&H HC 142Â
#A salesman engaged in sales and publicity of company's products not a ‘workman'.Del. HC 130Â
#Permission to lead evidence untenable if not pleaded or applied by employer.Del. HC 132Â
#Collecting fare without issuing tickets will justify dismissal. All. HC 145Â
#P.F. Authority cannot defend its own order in higher court. Ker. HC 148Â
#Appeal against orders under section 7A or 7B of the Provident Fund Act mandates pre-deposit of determined amount. Del. HC 118
#Bias against Enquiry Officer cannot be inferred without supporting evidence. Del. HC 122Â
#Modifying dismissal, Labour Court has to record reasons. Â Supreme Court 113Â
#Selling tea and running grocery shop not necessarily ‘gainful employment'. Raj. HC 205Â
#Compensation received under Employees' Compensation Act will debar claim under ESI Act. Â Raj. HC 204
#Validity of domestic enquiry is main factor for deciding application for approval of dismissal. Bom. HC 169Â
#A Medical Representative is not a ‘workman' . Pat. HC 185
 #Punishment is discriminatory if in a similar case another delinquent employee is let off.Supreme Court 159Â
#Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation in respect of an uninsured pillion rider. Bom. HC 175
#Confidence of Management will be lost in a habitual absentee. Â Mad. HC 182
#Termination of a probationer if sigmatic without holding enquiry will be vitiated.Bom. HC 209
#Public servant when Complainant, need not be examined at initial stage.Jhar. HC 154
#Termination of a workman after repeated extensions would amount to retrenchment.P&H HC 138Â
#Non-compliance of section 25-F of ID Act on termination will not always warrant reinstatement. P&H HC 138
#Repeated dispatching of letters at wrong address justifies dismissal. Del. HC 122
#Enquiry when vitiated, Award can be in favour of ‘workman'. Del. HC 132
#Continuous losses would justify interim protection by EPF Tribunal from pre-deposit.Del. HC 125
#Pre-deposit not necessary when appeal before EPF Tribunal pertains to escaped amount. Del. HC 133
#'Change in service condition' not attracted when transfer is part of contract of service. Â MP HC 157
#Termination not illegal when the employee admits her signature on resignation and receipt for payment. Â P&H HC 191
#Enquiry to be set aside if delinquent is not supplied copies of documents, as relied upon. Supreme Court 159
#Only the EPF Appellate Tribunal can confirm / modify / annul the order of EPF Authority. Bom. HC 193
#A bus conductor holds the post of trust. All. HC 145
#Years of unblemished record is important for imposing punishment. Gau. HC 152
#EPF Appellate Tribunal cannot pass conditional stay for damages. Del. HC 118
#Dismissal of a workman, who lied on oath in the Labour Court, is justified.Del. HC 122
#Dismissal of appeal by the EPF Appellate Tribunal before expiry of stipulated period untenable. Del. HC 133
#One can't claim accident compensation under two different Acts. Â Raj. HC 204
#Schools under State control or aided are exempted from coverage by Provident Fund Act. Raj. HC 192
#Failure of workman to support his claim on repeated opportunities shows he is not diligent. Â P&H HC 190
#Failure to prove employer-employee relationship would not entitle any relief.P&H HC 187
#In case of conflict between appointment letter and standing order the latter will prevail. Bom. HC 209
#Misconduct in causing loss by a worker for his personal gain would justify dismissal.Supreme Court 113
#Aggrieved workman can avail remedy under the ID Act. Ori. HC 197
#Section 33(2)(b) of the I.D. Act will be confined to the enquiry. Bom. HC 169
#An unreasoned order of any Authority is not sustainable. Bom. HC 202
#Discriminatory punishment is liable to be vitiated. Supreme Court 159
#Section 25F of ID Act not to be complied by an employer on termination of contractor's workman. P&H HC 187
From India, Kolkata
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
12#Branch Manager of a bank is not a ‘workman'. Guj. HC 143Â
#Unauthorised habitual absence of workman is a grave misconduct. Â Mad. HC 182
#Authority holding proceeding under S.7A of the EPF Act, will be vested with powers of Civil Court. All. HC 176Â
#Pre-deposit not warranted in an appeal in EPF Tribunal pertaining to damages and interests. Â Del. HC 133Â
#EPF Authority's order without identification of beneficiaries not sustainable.Gau. HC 201Â
#Probation period can't be enhanced beyond six months as stipulated by Model Standing Orders. Bom. HC 209
#Unintentional delay in deposit of EPF contributions will justify waiver of damages.P&H HC 142Â
#A salesman engaged in sales and publicity of company's products not a ‘workman'.Del. HC 130Â
#Permission to lead evidence untenable if not pleaded or applied by employer.Del. HC 132Â
#Collecting fare without issuing tickets will justify dismissal. All. HC 145Â
#P.F. Authority cannot defend its own order in higher court. Ker. HC 148Â
#Appeal against orders under section 7A or 7B of the Provident Fund Act mandates pre-deposit of determined amount. Del. HC 118
#Bias against Enquiry Officer cannot be inferred without supporting evidence. Del. HC 122Â
#Modifying dismissal, Labour Court has to record reasons. Â Supreme Court 113Â
#Selling tea and running grocery shop not necessarily ‘gainful employment'. Raj. HC 205Â
#Compensation received under Employees' Compensation Act will debar claim under ESI Act. Â Raj. HC 204
#Validity of domestic enquiry is main factor for deciding application for approval of dismissal. Bom. HC 169Â
#A Medical Representative is not a ‘workman' . Pat. HC 185
 #Punishment is discriminatory if in a similar case another delinquent employee is let off.Supreme Court 159Â
#Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation in respect of an uninsured pillion rider. Bom. HC 175
#Confidence of Management will be lost in a habitual absentee. Â Mad. HC 182
#Termination of a probationer if sigmatic without holding enquiry will be vitiated.Bom. HC 209
#Public servant when Complainant, need not be examined at initial stage.Jhar. HC 154
#Termination of a workman after repeated extensions would amount to retrenchment.P&H HC 138Â
#Non-compliance of section 25-F of ID Act on termination will not always warrant reinstatement. P&H HC 138
#Repeated dispatching of letters at wrong address justifies dismissal. Del. HC 122
#Enquiry when vitiated, Award can be in favour of ‘workman'. Del. HC 132
#Continuous losses would justify interim protection by EPF Tribunal from pre-deposit.Del. HC 125
#Pre-deposit not necessary when appeal before EPF Tribunal pertains to escaped amount. Del. HC 133
#'Change in service condition' not attracted when transfer is part of contract of service. Â MP HC 157
#Termination not illegal when the employee admits her signature on resignation and receipt for payment. Â P&H HC 191
#Enquiry to be set aside if delinquent is not supplied copies of documents, as relied upon. Supreme Court 159
#Only the EPF Appellate Tribunal can confirm / modify / annul the order of EPF Authority. Bom. HC 193
#A bus conductor holds the post of trust. All. HC 145
#Years of unblemished record is important for imposing punishment. Gau. HC 152
#EPF Appellate Tribunal cannot pass conditional stay for damages. Del. HC 118
#Dismissal of a workman, who lied on oath in the Labour Court, is justified.Del. HC 122
#Dismissal of appeal by the EPF Appellate Tribunal before expiry of stipulated period untenable. Del. HC 133
#One can't claim accident compensation under two different Acts. Â Raj. HC 204
#Schools under State control or aided are exempted from coverage by Provident Fund Act. Raj. HC 192
#Failure of workman to support his claim on repeated opportunities shows he is not diligent. Â P&H HC 190
#Failure to prove employer-employee relationship would not entitle any relief.P&H HC 187
#In case of conflict between appointment letter and standing order the latter will prevail. Bom. HC 209
#Misconduct in causing loss by a worker for his personal gain would justify dismissal.Supreme Court 113
#Aggrieved workman can avail remedy under the ID Act. Ori. HC 197
#Section 33(2)(b) of the I.D. Act will be confined to the enquiry. Bom. HC 169
#An unreasoned order of any Authority is not sustainable. Bom. HC 202
#Discriminatory punishment is liable to be vitiated. Supreme Court 159
#Section 25F of ID Act not to be complied by an employer on termination of contractor's workman. P&H HC 187
From India, Kolkata
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi Buddy,
I really enjoyed reading the above-mentioned court orders. Please continue this as it will surely help trainees like us to be well-versed in labor laws. Thank you once again.
With Regards,
Mr. Thumbs Up
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I really enjoyed reading the above-mentioned court orders. Please continue this as it will surely help trainees like us to be well-versed in labor laws. Thank you once again.
With Regards,
Mr. Thumbs Up
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Sir,
Please share the recent labor law amendments. It is useful to all members. "Recent" means between 2014 to 2016. What amendments did the government make? Please attach the updated files as this information is very important.
Thank you.
Regards,
Srikanth R. Gowda
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Please share the recent labor law amendments. It is useful to all members. "Recent" means between 2014 to 2016. What amendments did the government make? Please attach the updated files as this information is very important.
Thank you.
Regards,
Srikanth R. Gowda
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Though it is quite informative, it is half cooked information. It is better to give full case number to search from different sources.. For example the "Loss of confidence in employee would justify his dismissal from service. Â Supreme Court 113". Such should be given accessible lead.
From India, Nellore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Nellore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The long list of labor laws judgments is quite useless for any HR executive in the absence of any appropriate court case reference or web link to access the judgment. HRSpot, whoever you are, can you suggest to the members how they can access any of the aforementioned cases or should they quote you as the authority in deciding any such case, especially when they don't even know your identity or real name? If challenged by the employees in court, they may fail without proper documentation.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Join Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
RECENT AMENDMENTS IN THE LABOUR LAWS.doc
1341335108_4081 00000_1-Picture s-of--Professio nal-Industrial- Labour-Law-Advi ser-Legal-Consu ltants.jpg