A curious case has emerged that touches both legal interpretation and humane employment practices.
Scenario:
A workman was under suspension pending a domestic enquiry. Unfortunately, during this suspension period, he met with a fatal accident at home.
This raises an important question:
Is the deceased workman entitled to any compensation or statutory benefits under Indian labour laws?
If yes, under which provisions or legal interpretations?
Some immediate considerations:
The death did not occur during working hours or in the course of employment.
The employee was still on company rolls under suspension, not dismissed.
Can EDLI under EPF, gratuity, or subsistence allowance dues be rightfully claimed by the legal heirs?
Is there any judicial precedent or case law that interprets such situations?
I invite labour law experts, HR leaders, compliance professionals, and advocates to share your views on:
Legal liabilities on the employer
Moral or goodwill obligations in such cases
How your organization would handle such a case
Let’s together build clarity around such grey areas that blend statutory, ethical, and procedural dimensions.
Source: - Post by @Hemant Teje on LinkedIn
From India, Bangalore
Scenario:
A workman was under suspension pending a domestic enquiry. Unfortunately, during this suspension period, he met with a fatal accident at home.
This raises an important question:
Is the deceased workman entitled to any compensation or statutory benefits under Indian labour laws?
If yes, under which provisions or legal interpretations?
Some immediate considerations:
The death did not occur during working hours or in the course of employment.
The employee was still on company rolls under suspension, not dismissed.
Can EDLI under EPF, gratuity, or subsistence allowance dues be rightfully claimed by the legal heirs?
Is there any judicial precedent or case law that interprets such situations?
I invite labour law experts, HR leaders, compliance professionals, and advocates to share your views on:
Legal liabilities on the employer
Moral or goodwill obligations in such cases
How your organization would handle such a case
Let’s together build clarity around such grey areas that blend statutory, ethical, and procedural dimensions.
Source: - Post by @Hemant Teje on LinkedIn
From India, Bangalore
This is indeed a complex situation that requires careful consideration of legal, ethical, and procedural aspects. From a legal standpoint, the Employee's Deposit Linked Insurance (EDLI) Scheme under the Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) Act, 1952, provides insurance benefits to the employees of the covered establishments. The benefits are available irrespective of whether the death occurs while on duty or not. Therefore, the legal heirs of the deceased employee should be able to claim the EDLI benefits.
As for gratuity, according to the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, if an employee dies during the period of his service, the employer is liable to pay gratuity to the nominee or legal heir of the deceased employee. This should apply even if the employee was under suspension at the time of death.
The subsistence allowance that was due to the employee during the period of suspension should also be paid to the legal heirs.
However, it's important to note that these are general interpretations of the law and the actual applicability may vary based on specific circumstances and legal advice.
From an ethical standpoint, while there are no legal obligations, the employer may choose to extend additional support to the family of the deceased employee as a goodwill gesture. This could include providing assistance in claiming the statutory benefits, offering additional financial support, or extending support like counseling to the family members.
In terms of handling such a situation, it would be advisable for organizations to have a clear policy in place for such unfortunate incidents. This should include a step-by-step guide on the process to claim statutory benefits and any additional support that the organization intends to provide. This will ensure a fair and empathetic approach to handling such sensitive situations.
From India, Gurugram
As for gratuity, according to the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, if an employee dies during the period of his service, the employer is liable to pay gratuity to the nominee or legal heir of the deceased employee. This should apply even if the employee was under suspension at the time of death.
The subsistence allowance that was due to the employee during the period of suspension should also be paid to the legal heirs.
However, it's important to note that these are general interpretations of the law and the actual applicability may vary based on specific circumstances and legal advice.
From an ethical standpoint, while there are no legal obligations, the employer may choose to extend additional support to the family of the deceased employee as a goodwill gesture. This could include providing assistance in claiming the statutory benefits, offering additional financial support, or extending support like counseling to the family members.
In terms of handling such a situation, it would be advisable for organizations to have a clear policy in place for such unfortunate incidents. This should include a step-by-step guide on the process to claim statutory benefits and any additional support that the organization intends to provide. This will ensure a fair and empathetic approach to handling such sensitive situations.
From India, Gurugram
For claiming EDLI the death need not be during the course or in connection with employment. Only thing is that at the time of death the deceased should be an employee. Suspension will not break the employee employer relationship. Moreover, during suspension period the employer is paying him subsistence allowance. Therefore, legally he is an employee only. Also his name has not been exited from the PF records. Therefore, his dependents will get EDLI for sure.
regarding gratuity also the same theory applies. His dependents shall claim gratuity. No, the employer should calculate the amount of gratuity payable and pay it within 30 days of the death of the employee.
The full and final settlement shall also include unpaid subsistence allowance and unavailed leaves to his credit.
From India, Kannur
regarding gratuity also the same theory applies. His dependents shall claim gratuity. No, the employer should calculate the amount of gratuity payable and pay it within 30 days of the death of the employee.
The full and final settlement shall also include unpaid subsistence allowance and unavailed leaves to his credit.
From India, Kannur
In terms of the Service Rules as applicable to public servant the Disciplinary (Departmental) Proceedings come to an end with the demise of the employee. Suspension, in the given facts, is incidental to the proceedings.
Based on the above ratio the deceased employee is entitled to all the death benefits at par with an employee in regular service.
From India, Kochi
Based on the above ratio the deceased employee is entitled to all the death benefits at par with an employee in regular service.
From India, Kochi
I agree with your interpretation of the situation. According to the prevalent service rules, the disciplinary proceedings end with the demise of the employee. The suspension, as you rightly pointed out, is incidental to the proceedings. This means that the deceased employee should be treated on par with an employee in regular service when it comes to death benefits.
The Employee's Deposit Linked Insurance (EDLI) under the Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) is indeed applicable in this case. The EDLI scheme under the EPF provides a lump sum payment to the nominated beneficiary in the event of the death of the employee during the period of the service, irrespective of cause. In this case, even though the employee was under suspension, he was not formally dismissed and was still part of the company rolls. As such, his legal heirs can rightfully claim the EDLI benefits. You can find more details at the official EPF India website https://www.epfindia.gov.in.
As for gratuity, the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, stipulates that an employee is eligible for gratuity if he has rendered continuous service for not less than five years. Since the employee was suspended and not dismissed, his period of service continues until his demise. Therefore, his legal heirs can claim his gratuity dues as well.
A subsistence allowance is usually a part of the suspension period until the domestic inquiry is completed. In this case, since the domestic inquiry could not be completed due to the unfortunate demise of the employee, his legal heirs should be eligible to claim the allowance for the period until his death.
As for the moral and goodwill obligations, it is important for organizations to approach such situations with empathy and compassion. Providing the necessary support to the family of the deceased employee, including helping them navigate through the process of claiming the benefits, can go a long way in demonstrating the organization's commitment to its employees.
Please note that while this is a general interpretation based on the prevalent laws and norms, it would be advisable to consult a legal expert or labour law consultant to understand the specifics of the situation in the context of the organization's policies and the applicable laws.
From India, Gurugram
The Employee's Deposit Linked Insurance (EDLI) under the Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) is indeed applicable in this case. The EDLI scheme under the EPF provides a lump sum payment to the nominated beneficiary in the event of the death of the employee during the period of the service, irrespective of cause. In this case, even though the employee was under suspension, he was not formally dismissed and was still part of the company rolls. As such, his legal heirs can rightfully claim the EDLI benefits. You can find more details at the official EPF India website https://www.epfindia.gov.in.
As for gratuity, the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, stipulates that an employee is eligible for gratuity if he has rendered continuous service for not less than five years. Since the employee was suspended and not dismissed, his period of service continues until his demise. Therefore, his legal heirs can claim his gratuity dues as well.
A subsistence allowance is usually a part of the suspension period until the domestic inquiry is completed. In this case, since the domestic inquiry could not be completed due to the unfortunate demise of the employee, his legal heirs should be eligible to claim the allowance for the period until his death.
As for the moral and goodwill obligations, it is important for organizations to approach such situations with empathy and compassion. Providing the necessary support to the family of the deceased employee, including helping them navigate through the process of claiming the benefits, can go a long way in demonstrating the organization's commitment to its employees.
Please note that while this is a general interpretation based on the prevalent laws and norms, it would be advisable to consult a legal expert or labour law consultant to understand the specifics of the situation in the context of the organization's policies and the applicable laws.
From India, Gurugram
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-Your explanation is spot on! The employee-employer relationship continues during suspension, allowing for EDLI and gratuity claims. Well done for such a comprehensive response! Keep sharing your insights. (1 Acknowledge point)