One of my employees has resigned, and he has been relieved of his duties at his request after serving a 2-month notice period instead of the required 3 months. We have paid his salary for the first month during the notice period, but the salary for the second month has not been paid as he did not complete the full 3-month notice period. We are considering compensating him for the remaining month's salary.
What will be the consequences of this situation as the employee is threatening to file a complaint with the Department of Labour Relations?
Please assist me in this matter as soon as possible.
Regards, Prasad.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
What will be the consequences of this situation as the employee is threatening to file a complaint with the Department of Labour Relations?
Please assist me in this matter as soon as possible.
Regards, Prasad.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Under the Payment of Wages Act, read along with the Shops and Establishment Act, you need to pay him the wages by the 7th of the next month. Now, you said you have allowed him to leave. This means you have legally waived the employee's notice period. Hence, you cannot sue for compensation.
From India, Kolkata
Acknowledge(2)Amend(0)
180From India, Kolkata
Acknowledge(2)Amend(0)
Considerations for Employee Resignation and Compensation
Prasad, what needs to be looked into is that:
1. There was a provision to relieve the employee in the employment letter, with or without pay.
2. The employee was not deprived of his right to compensation for the notice due to non-compliance with your company policies.
In your case, it is evident that:
1. The employee resigned on his own and agreed to serve a three-month notice period.
2. Salary for month 1 was paid to him for the time he worked for your company.
3. Salary for month 2 is still not paid.
4. Salary for month 2 can be set off against the last month's notice, which the employee is not intending to serve.
It is important that the condition, as I outlined in clause 4 above, was agreed to with the employee and substantiated by prima facie evidence. If it was agreed upon, then you are all set to set off month 2 payable with month 3 notice. If there was no agreement, please release month 2 salary and move ahead with the recovery proceedings for the notice period not served, i.e., month 3.
Best wishes.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
Prasad, what needs to be looked into is that:
1. There was a provision to relieve the employee in the employment letter, with or without pay.
2. The employee was not deprived of his right to compensation for the notice due to non-compliance with your company policies.
In your case, it is evident that:
1. The employee resigned on his own and agreed to serve a three-month notice period.
2. Salary for month 1 was paid to him for the time he worked for your company.
3. Salary for month 2 is still not paid.
4. Salary for month 2 can be set off against the last month's notice, which the employee is not intending to serve.
It is important that the condition, as I outlined in clause 4 above, was agreed to with the employee and substantiated by prima facie evidence. If it was agreed upon, then you are all set to set off month 2 payable with month 3 notice. If there was no agreement, please release month 2 salary and move ahead with the recovery proceedings for the notice period not served, i.e., month 3.
Best wishes.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
Mr. Prasad,
What does your company's HR policy say? Do the terms of employment address this issue? If so, you can recover the balance NP amount from the final settlement or dues payable to the employee.
V. Murali
From India, Madipakkam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
What does your company's HR policy say? Do the terms of employment address this issue? If so, you can recover the balance NP amount from the final settlement or dues payable to the employee.
V. Murali
From India, Madipakkam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Fair Treatment During Notice Period
In the HR department, we have the power to discern right from wrong. If you have asked him to serve a two-month notice period and then the company decides not to pay him for one full month, it is an unfair practice. The company often makes the "notice period" phase extremely difficult for an employee without good reason. He is well within his rights to sue the company for non-payment of salary. Employees will always remember how they were treated during their notice period and will share their experiences, so ensure it contributes positively to the company's goodwill.
Regards
From United Kingdom, Harrow
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In the HR department, we have the power to discern right from wrong. If you have asked him to serve a two-month notice period and then the company decides not to pay him for one full month, it is an unfair practice. The company often makes the "notice period" phase extremely difficult for an employee without good reason. He is well within his rights to sue the company for non-payment of salary. Employees will always remember how they were treated during their notice period and will share their experiences, so ensure it contributes positively to the company's goodwill.
Regards
From United Kingdom, Harrow
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Public Notice from Government of Maharashtra Department of Labour Bonus payment through banks on.pdf