Query Regarding Gratuity and Compensation in Lay-offs
I have a query regarding gratuity and compensation in relation to a lay-off. An employee has completed 4 years and has entered the 5th year. The employer advises leaving the job just after the 4th year is completed. The reason cited is that the SBU is making a loss, so quite a few of the employees have to be reduced, and they have to resign. The employees are not being terminated officially as the employer wants it to appear that these people have resigned from the job to avoid any legal issues. Are such employees eligible for gratuity?
Looking forward to your suggestions.
Regards
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
I have a query regarding gratuity and compensation in relation to a lay-off. An employee has completed 4 years and has entered the 5th year. The employer advises leaving the job just after the 4th year is completed. The reason cited is that the SBU is making a loss, so quite a few of the employees have to be reduced, and they have to resign. The employees are not being terminated officially as the employer wants it to appear that these people have resigned from the job to avoid any legal issues. Are such employees eligible for gratuity?
Looking forward to your suggestions.
Regards
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr.Shan The employees are not entitled for gratuity as they have not completed five years of continuous service. With regards
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
181From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
NO, even if they have worked for 4 year 11 Months and 20 Days they are not eligible for Gratuity. You Must complete your 5 years then only you become eligible for Gratuity I hope this might help you
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Vandanajasmalik There is a judgment of the Madras High Court on this issue. It is available in this forum With regards
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In fact, I had misquoted here. This situation cannot be a LAY-OFF. This is basically a silent RETRENCHMENT. I suppose it can officially be called a Retrenchment only if the employer had posted a NOTICE OF RETRENCHMENT. Since the employer wishes not to compensate rightfully, he tells these people to look for a job elsewhere in a month's time WITHOUT GIVING ANY NOTICE from his side. It is clearly a Retrenchment minus the employer's notice.
In this regard, I look forward to your suggestions:
1. Since these employees have to be released, what should be done to make it a Retrenchment?
2. Is Retrenchment and its benefits applicable for executives?
3. What are the applicable retrenchment benefits?
4. How does the Retrenchment process begin?
5. Will it be wise to prefer a Retrenchment, or simply resign serving 1 month's notice from the Employee's side to the Employer?
Please guide...
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In this regard, I look forward to your suggestions:
1. Since these employees have to be released, what should be done to make it a Retrenchment?
2. Is Retrenchment and its benefits applicable for executives?
3. What are the applicable retrenchment benefits?
4. How does the Retrenchment process begin?
5. Will it be wise to prefer a Retrenchment, or simply resign serving 1 month's notice from the Employee's side to the Employer?
Please guide...
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. Shan,
If the employee resigns, then it cannot be called retrenchment because retrenchment is the termination of the services of a workman for any reason except the exceptions mentioned in section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act. If the workmen are released without a resignation letter from them, the action of the employer becomes retrenchment.
The Industrial Disputes Act defines the term "workmen." All workmen are entitled to retrenchment compensation if they are retrenched. The designation given to an individual worker does not determine whether he is a worker as defined under the Industrial Disputes Act. The nature of work done by him determines whether he is a worker as defined under the Industrial Disputes Act or not.
If a worker is retrenched, he is entitled to one month's notice or wages for one month in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation at 15 days' average pay for every completed year of service.
From the employer's point of view, resignation is ideal. From the worker's point of view, if he is retrenched, he will receive monetary compensation at the rates specified.
With regards,
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
If the employee resigns, then it cannot be called retrenchment because retrenchment is the termination of the services of a workman for any reason except the exceptions mentioned in section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act. If the workmen are released without a resignation letter from them, the action of the employer becomes retrenchment.
The Industrial Disputes Act defines the term "workmen." All workmen are entitled to retrenchment compensation if they are retrenched. The designation given to an individual worker does not determine whether he is a worker as defined under the Industrial Disputes Act. The nature of work done by him determines whether he is a worker as defined under the Industrial Disputes Act or not.
If a worker is retrenched, he is entitled to one month's notice or wages for one month in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation at 15 days' average pay for every completed year of service.
From the employer's point of view, resignation is ideal. From the worker's point of view, if he is retrenched, he will receive monetary compensation at the rates specified.
With regards,
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Gratuity Eligibility and Court Judgments
There is a judgment from the Madras High Court where it agrees to pay gratuity if someone has completed 240 days in the fifth year. However, that judgment is applicable to that particular case only, and our primary reference is the Gratuity Act, which clearly states that you should have five years of service to become eligible for gratuity. So, I feel Vandana is right.
Even when we insure our gratuity through LIC, they also do not pay gratuity if someone has not completed 5 years.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
There is a judgment from the Madras High Court where it agrees to pay gratuity if someone has completed 240 days in the fifth year. However, that judgment is applicable to that particular case only, and our primary reference is the Gratuity Act, which clearly states that you should have five years of service to become eligible for gratuity. So, I feel Vandana is right.
Even when we insure our gratuity through LIC, they also do not pay gratuity if someone has not completed 5 years.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I request you to go through the judgment of the Madras High Court in the Mettur Beardsells case thoroughly. LIC of India has to act according to the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act and the interpretations placed on that Act by the various High Courts and the Supreme Court. LIC of India cannot interpret the law.
Regards,
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards,
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Gratuity on Retrenchment in closure of unit-SC judgment.docx
Published_draft _rules_on Employees_ compensation 3.6.2020.pdf