Hi!
Going by your experience, how successful is forced ranking/normalization in a mid-size (150-200 employees) organization? Which is the most scientific way of appraisal for this size of organization?
From India, Calcutta
Going by your experience, how successful is forced ranking/normalization in a mid-size (150-200 employees) organization? Which is the most scientific way of appraisal for this size of organization?
From India, Calcutta
Hi,
Any group above 50 can follow the process of normalization/forced ranking. Even if you have 100-200 people in the organization, all cannot be average, above average, or below average. It is important to differentiate performance, and NPC is the best way for organizations to determine that.
Regards,
Yasha
From United States, Minneapolis
Any group above 50 can follow the process of normalization/forced ranking. Even if you have 100-200 people in the organization, all cannot be average, above average, or below average. It is important to differentiate performance, and NPC is the best way for organizations to determine that.
Regards,
Yasha
From United States, Minneapolis
Normalisation is an inherent part of the appraisal process in mid-sized and large companies. Normalization is the process of reviewing the ratings of each group as a whole to ensure the ratings are in line with recommended norms, and the percentages are generally determined by HR. As a general guideline, the normalized rating of an employee would be arrived at by considering the difficulty of the assignment, the importance of the Key Result Areas (KRA) attached to the individuals, etc. This rating would be relative to the performance of other employees in the group, taking into account the same factors. Certain parameters have to be defined to arrive at normalized ratings.
I hope this information is sufficient.
From India, Mumbai
I hope this information is sufficient.
From India, Mumbai
Normalization is an inherent part of the appraisal process in mid-sized and large companies. Normalization is the process of reviewing the ratings of each group as a whole to ensure the ratings align with recommended norms. The percentages are generally decided by HR.
As a general guideline, the normalized rating of an employee is determined by taking into account the difficulty of assignments, the importance of KRAs attached to the individuals, etc. This rating is relative to the performance of other employees in the group considering the same factors. Certain parameters need to be defined to arrive at normalized ratings.
Hope this input would suffice.
From India, Mumbai
As a general guideline, the normalized rating of an employee is determined by taking into account the difficulty of assignments, the importance of KRAs attached to the individuals, etc. This rating is relative to the performance of other employees in the group considering the same factors. Certain parameters need to be defined to arrive at normalized ratings.
Hope this input would suffice.
From India, Mumbai
hi all For a 25000 employees organisation like NTPC...its following a narmalisation procedure for its PACE score ..datz the system they follow in PMS. regards aanchal
From India, Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.