Bus2perf
Director
ATOM198
Hr Assesment
+1 Other

Cite.Co is a repository of information and resources created by industry seniors and experts sharing their real world insights. Join Network
hi.. i need ur help to know how can i evaluate the efficiency of our performance apprasial ?? im waiting
From Bahrain, Manama
How best to evaluate a performance management system will vary from company to company, depending on its environment and the type of performance management system in place. Here are a few ideas to get you started.

Operational Objectives

------------------------------

% of performance appraisals completed by due date.

% of employees with a development plan.

Person hours used in managing the performance management system.

Money spent in managing the performance management system.

People Objectives

------------------------

% of employees satisfied with performance management system.

% of supervisors/managers satisfied with performance management system.

% of employees with improved performance rating.

% of employees eligible to move to their next role.

% of employees that leave due to poor performance management.

Working out efficiency ratios is a matter of comparing the KPI results above with the internal company targets set for each measure and/or comparing it with external benchmarks.

I would recommend a mix of leading (end outcome) objectives and lagging (in process) objectives. This would mean that you need to be clear about what you want to achieve with your performance management system and what processes you use to achieve your objectives.

You can find out more about performance measurement at http://www.businessperform.com/html/...asurement.html

And we have more information on employee performance management at http://www.businessperform.com/html/...anagement.html

Vicki Heath

Human Resources Software and Resources

http://www.businessperform.com

From Australia, Melbourne
It's amazing that such dinosaurs (performance reviews, not the people) are still around. Yet despite the outcry against performance reviews, there's nothing wrong with them that can't be fixed by getting managers off of center stage. Top management can fix the basic problems the performance appraisal system faces.

Critics argue that performance reviews not only don't accomplish what they're supposed to do - that is, improve performance, enhance employee skills and achieve planned outcomes - they have unintended negative consequences. In many cases, unfortunately, that's true. But it doesn't have to be that way. What companies need to abolish is not performance review itself, but the idea that it's a “management tool. Here are some practiced paradigms that must be discarded:

Performance Review is designed, as the name suggests, in support of managers. If you believe this, your management is one of the roadblocks to exceptional performance. The most useful performance review support work relationships between employees (managers too are employees). Both parties need to address the question of how to best serve the goals and outcomes and align their work efforts.

Performance review is a management tool. Managers are not necessarily the best qualified to assess their staff’s accomplishments. In fact, they may have a very limited or biased view. A more complete and accurate picture results when employees and managers seek feedback from a variety of customers, team leaders, professional peers, and others inside or from outside the unit.

Performance reviews include judgments from a “higher authority”. Judgments produce compliant workers – people who are told what to do – not innovative ones. People hate performance reviews because most of them are fault-finding. How much better to ask, “What did we learn from this? What can we each do different the next time?”

The manager is responsible for obtaining input from the employees. 21st century employees can’t assume a passive role in performance review, providing “tough-minded” self-assessments and valuable insights only on request. They must take the initiative, soliciting feedback from their managers and others. No risk taking to solicit the complete picture and no learning means no improvements.

Managers should be trained in performance reviews, then prepare their employees for the process. If performance review is to be a productive partnership with employees taking the active role and both parties committed to exchanging knowledge and ideas, managers and employee need to be trained together.

From United States, Walnut Creek
This discussion thread is closed. If you want to continue this discussion or have a follow up question, please post it on the network.
Add the url of this thread if you want to cite this discussion.






About Us Advertise Contact Us
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service



All rights reserved @ 2020 Cite.Co™