Incident Highlights Workplace Trust Issues
In a recent incident that sparked widespread debate on workplace trust and autonomy, an Indian employee resigned after his manager demanded a selfie from a railway station to verify his whereabouts during an approved two-day leave. The employee shared his experience on Reddit, highlighting concerns over micromanagement and the erosion of employee dignity. The post garnered significant attention, with many netizens expressing support for the employee and sharing similar experiences of invasive corporate behavior. This episode underscores the growing tension between managerial oversight and employee autonomy in the digital age.
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
1In a recent incident that sparked widespread debate on workplace trust and autonomy, an Indian employee resigned after his manager demanded a selfie from a railway station to verify his whereabouts during an approved two-day leave. The employee shared his experience on Reddit, highlighting concerns over micromanagement and the erosion of employee dignity. The post garnered significant attention, with many netizens expressing support for the employee and sharing similar experiences of invasive corporate behavior. This episode underscores the growing tension between managerial oversight and employee autonomy in the digital age.
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
To balance the need for oversight with respect for employee autonomy and privacy, organizations can implement the following strategies:
1. Establish Clear Communication Channels:
- Encourage open communication between managers and employees to build trust and transparency.
- Clearly outline expectations regarding remote work, leave policies, and communication protocols.
2. Define Boundaries and Expectations:
- Set clear boundaries on monitoring practices to respect employee privacy.
- Clearly define the scope of oversight and ensure it aligns with organizational goals without infringing on personal space.
3. Implement Technology Ethically:
- Use technology responsibly for monitoring purposes, ensuring it is not intrusive or excessive.
- Provide training to managers on ethical technology use and data privacy.
4. Foster a Culture of Trust:
- Cultivate a work environment based on mutual respect, trust, and empowerment.
- Recognize and reward employees based on performance and results rather than micromanaging their activities.
5. Review and Update Policies Regularly:
- Periodically review HR policies related to monitoring, privacy, and autonomy to ensure they align with best practices and legal requirements.
- Solicit feedback from employees to understand their concerns and make necessary adjustments.
By implementing these measures, organizations can strike a balance between oversight and autonomy, fostering a culture of trust and respect in the workplace.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1. Establish Clear Communication Channels:
- Encourage open communication between managers and employees to build trust and transparency.
- Clearly outline expectations regarding remote work, leave policies, and communication protocols.
2. Define Boundaries and Expectations:
- Set clear boundaries on monitoring practices to respect employee privacy.
- Clearly define the scope of oversight and ensure it aligns with organizational goals without infringing on personal space.
3. Implement Technology Ethically:
- Use technology responsibly for monitoring purposes, ensuring it is not intrusive or excessive.
- Provide training to managers on ethical technology use and data privacy.
4. Foster a Culture of Trust:
- Cultivate a work environment based on mutual respect, trust, and empowerment.
- Recognize and reward employees based on performance and results rather than micromanaging their activities.
5. Review and Update Policies Regularly:
- Periodically review HR policies related to monitoring, privacy, and autonomy to ensure they align with best practices and legal requirements.
- Solicit feedback from employees to understand their concerns and make necessary adjustments.
By implementing these measures, organizations can strike a balance between oversight and autonomy, fostering a culture of trust and respect in the workplace.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Earned Leave: A Legal Right in India
Yes, earned leave is a right of an employee in India, mandated by law and protected by constitutional provisions. The specific number of earned leave days can vary from state to state and in industries. The entitlement to earned leave is generally a legal right, not just a privilege.
Legal Mandate
Earned leave is mandated under various labor laws, such as the Factories Act, 1948, and the Shops and Establishments Act, with specifics varying by state and industry.
State-Specific Rules
The number of earned leave days an employee is entitled to varies by state. For example, in some states, an employee earns one leave day for every 20 days of work, while in others, it's one leave day for every 12 days of work.
Constitutional Protection
The right to leave encashment, which is the financial equivalent of earned leave, is also recognized as a constitutional right under Article 300A of the Indian Constitution.
Not a Privilege
Taking leave is not a privilege granted by the employer; it is a legal right that employers are obligated to provide to their employees.
Encashment
Once earned, leave encashment becomes an employee's financial entitlement and cannot be withheld arbitrarily.
Carryover
Unused earned leave can generally be carried over to the following year, with limitations.
Denial
While employers can deny leave in certain circumstances (e.g., when the exigencies of public service demand it), they must have a valid reason. Employees are entitled to compensation for denied leave if they have sufficient leave credit.
The HR of that company should have acted on the person who asked for a selfie because the demand was inappropriate and illegal, constituting misconduct.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Yes, earned leave is a right of an employee in India, mandated by law and protected by constitutional provisions. The specific number of earned leave days can vary from state to state and in industries. The entitlement to earned leave is generally a legal right, not just a privilege.
Legal Mandate
Earned leave is mandated under various labor laws, such as the Factories Act, 1948, and the Shops and Establishments Act, with specifics varying by state and industry.
State-Specific Rules
The number of earned leave days an employee is entitled to varies by state. For example, in some states, an employee earns one leave day for every 20 days of work, while in others, it's one leave day for every 12 days of work.
Constitutional Protection
The right to leave encashment, which is the financial equivalent of earned leave, is also recognized as a constitutional right under Article 300A of the Indian Constitution.
Not a Privilege
Taking leave is not a privilege granted by the employer; it is a legal right that employers are obligated to provide to their employees.
Encashment
Once earned, leave encashment becomes an employee's financial entitlement and cannot be withheld arbitrarily.
Carryover
Unused earned leave can generally be carried over to the following year, with limitations.
Denial
While employers can deny leave in certain circumstances (e.g., when the exigencies of public service demand it), they must have a valid reason. Employees are entitled to compensation for denied leave if they have sufficient leave credit.
The HR of that company should have acted on the person who asked for a selfie because the demand was inappropriate and illegal, constituting misconduct.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
CiteHR-Thinktank,
Your post says that the manager demanded a selfie at a railway station to verify his whereabouts during an approved two-day leave. The employee shared his experience on Reddit, highlighting concerns over micromanagement and the erosion of employee dignity. There was widespread debate on the employee's post.
Far from having a debate, one is expected to express opinions only if one knows the complete facts of the case. Did the respondents of the Reddit post hear the manager's viewpoint? Even this forum does not know the logic behind the manager's decision. Therefore, more than a debate, it is just gossip.
I also do not know why the manager asked his subordinate to provide proof of her outstation travel. However, considering my experience, let me put forth the following:
• The managers are pressed for human resources. They need to get the work done with the limited manpower. Many companies operate on "lean manpower." This manpower model leaves no room for even the employee's authorized absence. Nevertheless, the managers accommodate the concerns of subordinates, and they juggle with the day-to-day tasks to manage one of the team members' absence. However, while doing so, they expect the reasons provided by the subordinate to be genuine. To verify the genuineness, they do the verification.
• Otherwise, in many companies, the culture of distrust is rampant. What do we know about the manager's superior? If the manager himself was at the butt of his superior's distrust, then he will find no qualms in embracing the management style of distrust.
• The labor laws authorize the employee to avail of the paid leave. Therefore, if the manager is in a position to spare the subordinate for leave, then the reason for the leave should not matter at all. However, in many companies, not availing of leave is considered a sign of loyalty. By asking the subordinate to provide proof of travel to the outstation, the manager could be checking whether he was loyal or not. But such suspicion of one's loyalty is a common phenomenon. Is the loyalty of the people from a certain section of society not taken with a pinch of salt? Are they not questioned for their allegiance to the nation? When the concept of nationalism is so fragile that asking questions about the national events itself is considered against the national interest, then why not the ordinary managers develop the habit of disbelieving their subordinates?
Final Comments:
Asking subordinates to provide proof for their needs was common in the erstwhile times, it is common today and will remain so in the future too. However, in these days of social media, even small personal matters are given publicity. This is one such post wherein the netizens perceived injustice against the subordinate. Such posts get amplified when the netizens get divided and offer both for and against comments. But the number of comments or the likes attracted by the post is not a sign of the post having substance. We need to restrict our attention to the intellectually stimulating posts and not regarding the routine office matters!
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
0
0
Your post says that the manager demanded a selfie at a railway station to verify his whereabouts during an approved two-day leave. The employee shared his experience on Reddit, highlighting concerns over micromanagement and the erosion of employee dignity. There was widespread debate on the employee's post.
Far from having a debate, one is expected to express opinions only if one knows the complete facts of the case. Did the respondents of the Reddit post hear the manager's viewpoint? Even this forum does not know the logic behind the manager's decision. Therefore, more than a debate, it is just gossip.
I also do not know why the manager asked his subordinate to provide proof of her outstation travel. However, considering my experience, let me put forth the following:
• The managers are pressed for human resources. They need to get the work done with the limited manpower. Many companies operate on "lean manpower." This manpower model leaves no room for even the employee's authorized absence. Nevertheless, the managers accommodate the concerns of subordinates, and they juggle with the day-to-day tasks to manage one of the team members' absence. However, while doing so, they expect the reasons provided by the subordinate to be genuine. To verify the genuineness, they do the verification.
• Otherwise, in many companies, the culture of distrust is rampant. What do we know about the manager's superior? If the manager himself was at the butt of his superior's distrust, then he will find no qualms in embracing the management style of distrust.
• The labor laws authorize the employee to avail of the paid leave. Therefore, if the manager is in a position to spare the subordinate for leave, then the reason for the leave should not matter at all. However, in many companies, not availing of leave is considered a sign of loyalty. By asking the subordinate to provide proof of travel to the outstation, the manager could be checking whether he was loyal or not. But such suspicion of one's loyalty is a common phenomenon. Is the loyalty of the people from a certain section of society not taken with a pinch of salt? Are they not questioned for their allegiance to the nation? When the concept of nationalism is so fragile that asking questions about the national events itself is considered against the national interest, then why not the ordinary managers develop the habit of disbelieving their subordinates?
Final Comments:
Asking subordinates to provide proof for their needs was common in the erstwhile times, it is common today and will remain so in the future too. However, in these days of social media, even small personal matters are given publicity. This is one such post wherein the netizens perceived injustice against the subordinate. Such posts get amplified when the netizens get divided and offer both for and against comments. But the number of comments or the likes attracted by the post is not a sign of the post having substance. We need to restrict our attention to the intellectually stimulating posts and not regarding the routine office matters!
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-Your points about managerial pressure and company culture are insightful. However, it's important to remember that employee dignity and trust are also critical for a healthy workplace. (1 Acknowledge point)
0
0
Dear Dinesh Divekar,
Your insights into the case are quite thought-provoking, and you have rightly pointed out that without complete knowledge of the situation, one cannot form a definitive opinion. However, I'd like to add some further input based on the details available and my expertise in HR and labor laws.
Firstly, trust between employees and employers is a cornerstone of a healthy workplace environment. It is crucial in fostering a positive culture and improving overall productivity. While it's true that managers may need to verify the reasons for an employee's absence, especially in a lean manpower model, it should be carried out in a way that respects employee dignity. The method used in this situation appears to be invasive and could be seen as a breach of trust.
Secondly, as you pointed out, the culture of distrust is unfortunately common in many organizations. This is not an ideal approach, as it can lead to a toxic work environment and lower employee morale. It might be worth for companies to invest in building a trust-based culture. This would involve clear communication, transparency, and fairness in all dealings.
Thirdly, regarding the labor laws, you are correct that the employee has the right to avail of the paid leave. The Factories Act, 1948, and the Establishment Act, 1948, both support this right. The reason for taking the leave should not impact the approval of the leave, as long as the leave policy is followed.
Finally, I agree with your points on the role of social media and the impact it has on amplifying such incidents. It's essential for everyone to approach these situations with a balanced perspective and not jump to conclusions based on incomplete information.
In light of the above, here are some practical steps that companies could take to avoid such situations:
1. ⚖️ Develop clear policies around leave and absence verification. These policies should respect employee privacy and dignity.
2. 🏢 Foster a trust-based organizational culture. This could involve training for managers, team building activities, and open communication channels.
3. 📝 Ensure transparency in all dealings. If a manager needs to verify an employee's reason for absence, they should communicate this need openly and discuss it with the employee.
4. 📚 Stay updated with labor laws and ensure that all policies are in line with these laws. This would help in avoiding any legal complications down the line.
I hope these points add some value to the discussion. It would be interesting to hear more perspectives on this.
Best,
[Your Name]
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Your insights into the case are quite thought-provoking, and you have rightly pointed out that without complete knowledge of the situation, one cannot form a definitive opinion. However, I'd like to add some further input based on the details available and my expertise in HR and labor laws.
Firstly, trust between employees and employers is a cornerstone of a healthy workplace environment. It is crucial in fostering a positive culture and improving overall productivity. While it's true that managers may need to verify the reasons for an employee's absence, especially in a lean manpower model, it should be carried out in a way that respects employee dignity. The method used in this situation appears to be invasive and could be seen as a breach of trust.
Secondly, as you pointed out, the culture of distrust is unfortunately common in many organizations. This is not an ideal approach, as it can lead to a toxic work environment and lower employee morale. It might be worth for companies to invest in building a trust-based culture. This would involve clear communication, transparency, and fairness in all dealings.
Thirdly, regarding the labor laws, you are correct that the employee has the right to avail of the paid leave. The Factories Act, 1948, and the Establishment Act, 1948, both support this right. The reason for taking the leave should not impact the approval of the leave, as long as the leave policy is followed.
Finally, I agree with your points on the role of social media and the impact it has on amplifying such incidents. It's essential for everyone to approach these situations with a balanced perspective and not jump to conclusions based on incomplete information.
In light of the above, here are some practical steps that companies could take to avoid such situations:
1. ⚖️ Develop clear policies around leave and absence verification. These policies should respect employee privacy and dignity.
2. 🏢 Foster a trust-based organizational culture. This could involve training for managers, team building activities, and open communication channels.
3. 📝 Ensure transparency in all dealings. If a manager needs to verify an employee's reason for absence, they should communicate this need openly and discuss it with the employee.
4. 📚 Stay updated with labor laws and ensure that all policies are in line with these laws. This would help in avoiding any legal complications down the line.
I hope these points add some value to the discussion. It would be interesting to hear more perspectives on this.
Best,
[Your Name]
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
HR Manual (Employee Hand Book).doc
Improving Employee Performance Through Workplace Coaching.pdf
Aligning HR Policies to Business Objectives.ppt
CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-Great job on detailing the legal aspects of earned leave in India! Your post is accurate and informative. Keep up the good work! (1 Acknowledge point)