Dear Seniors,
I received a notice from EPFO regarding justification required from us as to why our member and EPF contributions decreased in the year 2015 compared to 2014. What appropriate answer should we provide to the department that is justified and will withdraw this show cause notice?
In actuality, all the decreased members resigned on their own, and the company did not force them to do so. Additionally, we can explain to the department the decrease in orders from the buyers.
Seeking your valuable advice.
Regards,
Neeraj Sharma
From India, Gurdaspur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
2I received a notice from EPFO regarding justification required from us as to why our member and EPF contributions decreased in the year 2015 compared to 2014. What appropriate answer should we provide to the department that is justified and will withdraw this show cause notice?
In actuality, all the decreased members resigned on their own, and the company did not force them to do so. Additionally, we can explain to the department the decrease in orders from the buyers.
Seeking your valuable advice.
Regards,
Neeraj Sharma
From India, Gurdaspur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi Neeraj. You can reply with the same reason and mention the employees left on their won & due to the existing business situation we have not hired anyone as replacement
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. Neeraj,
Please go through the attached circular of June '14 about the New Inspection Scheme. Since in your case the remittance has decreased, the optional inspection may be done as per the guidelines. You may reply stating the fact that the number of manpower has reduced during the period under comparison, which has resulted in the reduced PF/EPF remittance. They may verify all the records and conclude based on the facts.
Regards, Rajendra Zala
From India, Rajkot
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Please go through the attached circular of June '14 about the New Inspection Scheme. Since in your case the remittance has decreased, the optional inspection may be done as per the guidelines. You may reply stating the fact that the number of manpower has reduced during the period under comparison, which has resulted in the reduced PF/EPF remittance. They may verify all the records and conclude based on the facts.
Regards, Rajendra Zala
From India, Rajkot
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Mr. Neeraj,
How can anyone not related to your company know or suggest why the management of your company reduced the members and the EPF? That information can only be known to the management if it is documented. If not, seek information from the relevant departments to determine the appropriate justification.
Regarding your proposed reply, "In actuality, all the decreased members resigned on their own, and the company did not force them to do so. Furthermore, we could explain to the department the decrease in orders from the buyers. Upon closer examination, both reasons appear contradictory. On one hand, you claim that the members resigned voluntarily, but your second proposed reply implies that the management itself reduced the members through retrenchment due to a decrease in demand for the company's products.
If the EPFO obtains and verifies the company's audited P&L statement, how do you intend to address this contradiction?
Please let me know if you need further clarification or assistance.
Thank you.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
How can anyone not related to your company know or suggest why the management of your company reduced the members and the EPF? That information can only be known to the management if it is documented. If not, seek information from the relevant departments to determine the appropriate justification.
Regarding your proposed reply, "In actuality, all the decreased members resigned on their own, and the company did not force them to do so. Furthermore, we could explain to the department the decrease in orders from the buyers. Upon closer examination, both reasons appear contradictory. On one hand, you claim that the members resigned voluntarily, but your second proposed reply implies that the management itself reduced the members through retrenchment due to a decrease in demand for the company's products.
If the EPFO obtains and verifies the company's audited P&L statement, how do you intend to address this contradiction?
Please let me know if you need further clarification or assistance.
Thank you.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
As earlier suggested, appropriate reply lies only with the management of your company, not outsiders, not being aware of any reason for reduction of employees or contribution. .
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Neeraj,
PFO will come to know regarding the increase/decrease in PF contributions and number of members from your ECR. They would have found that during the inspection which could have been done due to such a decrease in PF contribution & member number.
However, I am sure you would have furnished all the existing employees' details at the time of the ECR uploading, and the same would find its mention in Part C of your ECR along with the reason under the last column where it is asked.
You can draft a reply against this notice from the PFO stating that the reduction in PF contributions has been due to a reduction in the number of members, which is due to voluntary resignation. Due to the sluggishness in the market and dull business, our company management has decided to hold the recruitment of these vacancies. Hence, the PF contributions for 2015 have been lower than 2014.
It's likely that the PFC might issue you another notice seeking further clarification. You can reply on the same line as we have discussed above.
Good luck,
A.B.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
PFO will come to know regarding the increase/decrease in PF contributions and number of members from your ECR. They would have found that during the inspection which could have been done due to such a decrease in PF contribution & member number.
However, I am sure you would have furnished all the existing employees' details at the time of the ECR uploading, and the same would find its mention in Part C of your ECR along with the reason under the last column where it is asked.
You can draft a reply against this notice from the PFO stating that the reduction in PF contributions has been due to a reduction in the number of members, which is due to voluntary resignation. Due to the sluggishness in the market and dull business, our company management has decided to hold the recruitment of these vacancies. Hence, the PF contributions for 2015 have been lower than 2014.
It's likely that the PFC might issue you another notice seeking further clarification. You can reply on the same line as we have discussed above.
Good luck,
A.B.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Join Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
EPFO Circular PF - Correction in Name.pdf
Notice of Employee Change.doc