I am an HR professional working in a hotel in Haryana. We recruit Hotel Management students as industrial trainees for a 6-month period. It's important to note that we are not covered under the Apprentice Act.

Query on PF Deduction and Wage Regulations

My query is about the liability to deduct PF. If we are liable, do we also have to adhere to minimum wage regulations?

I would appreciate it if you could provide me with any recent updates regarding relevant laws.

Thanks & Regards,
Vijay Kumar

From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(1)
TC
Amend(0)

Industrial Exposure Trainees and Legal Obligations

The Act (EPF, ESI, Minimum Wages, or the ID Act) is silent concerning industrial exposure trainees. Since they are students undergoing practical training as per a curriculum of the University/institution, they are not considered employees. As such, no contribution is payable concerning them towards EPF or ESI. The same status will apply regarding the payment of minimum wages. Moreover, under the scheduled employment, IET is not included. However, if a Provident Fund or ESI inspection is carried out, it will be up to you to provide a satisfactory explanation to have them excluded.

Regards,
Madhu.T.K

From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Attached is the judgment of the Allahabad High Court, which substantiates the view of Madhu T. K. One more important thing is that you should not include their names in regular muster rolls. Please maintain a different register exclusively for trainees. Also, you must show any amount paid to them as 'Stipend' only. Do not use the term 'Wages' anywhere in respect to these trainees.

Regards

From India, Mumbai
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf Trainees not covered PF - Alahabad High Court.pdf (945.5 KB, 1369 views)

Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Clarification on Trainee Engagement and EPF Liability

What Manish stated seems different. The HC verdict follows the Apex Court verdict in CAMPCO's case, which relates to trainees engaged following a provision in the Standing Orders. Therefore, all trainees engaged following the provisions of the Apprentice Act and those engaged by virtue of Standing Orders are not covered by EPF. However, the case here is different, as they are neither Apprentices nor engaged under the Standing Orders.

In the case of Industrial Exposure Trainees, which is common in the hotel industry, I believe there is no quotable case law in existence. Whenever a query is raised by ESI or EPF, it should be responded to by stating that they are doing their "project" as "part of their curriculum."

Regards,
Madhu.T.K

From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

hi I am R S Pagad Advocte if empolyer havig standing order(trainee) or they are register under apprentices act then only empolyer is exampted from paying contribution of Traines /apprentics
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.