Hello friends,
One of my HR friends has come across the following situation regarding the notice period.
He joined a couple of years (2007) ago in a reputed manufacturing company in a Manager position where the company issued him an appointment letter mentioning that he had to give a 90-day notice period, and he acknowledged the same.
They were practicing 90 days and above for Managers & above, and below Managers - 30 days. However, some Managers in the same company for over a decade do not even have an appointment letter.
After some time, many Managers expressed discomfort with the 90-day notice period. Subsequently, the company implemented a separation policy in the HR policy manual, stating a 60-day notice period and communicated this change to all employees in 2008.
In the recent past, the company once again changed the notice period for employees who joined in the last year, issuing a notice period of one month until the GM position and 60 days for GMs & above.
Last week, he resigned from the company. Now, the company is asking him to serve a 90-day notice period as per his signed appointment letter. However, others in the same cadre who joined in the last year are given a 30-day notice period.
He is in a dilemma because of conflicting communications: 1) as per his appointment letter, 90 days 2) as per the HR policy document - 60 days 3) other employees in the same cadre - 30 days.
He assumed that since current employees in his cadre have a 30-day notice period, he should follow the same. He did not ask his manager to issue a revised notice.
When he shared the above communication, his boss informed him that since the appointment order is a binding agreement and no revised clause of the notice period is issued, he needs to serve a 3-month notice.
Please provide your expert advice/suggestions.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
One of my HR friends has come across the following situation regarding the notice period.
He joined a couple of years (2007) ago in a reputed manufacturing company in a Manager position where the company issued him an appointment letter mentioning that he had to give a 90-day notice period, and he acknowledged the same.
They were practicing 90 days and above for Managers & above, and below Managers - 30 days. However, some Managers in the same company for over a decade do not even have an appointment letter.
After some time, many Managers expressed discomfort with the 90-day notice period. Subsequently, the company implemented a separation policy in the HR policy manual, stating a 60-day notice period and communicated this change to all employees in 2008.
In the recent past, the company once again changed the notice period for employees who joined in the last year, issuing a notice period of one month until the GM position and 60 days for GMs & above.
Last week, he resigned from the company. Now, the company is asking him to serve a 90-day notice period as per his signed appointment letter. However, others in the same cadre who joined in the last year are given a 30-day notice period.
He is in a dilemma because of conflicting communications: 1) as per his appointment letter, 90 days 2) as per the HR policy document - 60 days 3) other employees in the same cadre - 30 days.
He assumed that since current employees in his cadre have a 30-day notice period, he should follow the same. He did not ask his manager to issue a revised notice.
When he shared the above communication, his boss informed him that since the appointment order is a binding agreement and no revised clause of the notice period is issued, he needs to serve a 3-month notice.
Please provide your expert advice/suggestions.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear,
The inequality in the notice period for the same class of persons can be highlighted in the form of a letter, and insistence on 30 days is to be projected as discriminatory. Wait for their response.
With Regards,
Advocates & Notaries & Legal Consultants for Staffing & Recruiting Industry
E-mail: rajanassociates@eth.net
Mobile: 9025792684 - 9025792634
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
204The inequality in the notice period for the same class of persons can be highlighted in the form of a letter, and insistence on 30 days is to be projected as discriminatory. Wait for their response.
With Regards,
Advocates & Notaries & Legal Consultants for Staffing & Recruiting Industry
E-mail: rajanassociates@eth.net
Mobile: 9025792684 - 9025792634
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear,
In my view, he has signed an agreement and as per that agreement, he has to serve a 90-day notice when leaving the organization. Agreements can vary for different employees. When there was a change in the HR manual and the company changed the policy, then the agreement clause should have been amended and signed by both parties. In the present situation, he has to give a 90-day notice (as per my view).
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In my view, he has signed an agreement and as per that agreement, he has to serve a 90-day notice when leaving the organization. Agreements can vary for different employees. When there was a change in the HR manual and the company changed the policy, then the agreement clause should have been amended and signed by both parties. In the present situation, he has to give a 90-day notice (as per my view).
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Join Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
Employment Agreement.pdf
Employment Agreement.doc
Notice period.jpg