Dear Friends,
Very good morning.
As Mr. Naren has already briefed about the Bangalore informal meet, there is nothing left for me to add. I appreciate the initiative taken by Mr. Naren, Mr. Rajaram, and Mr. Kourien. All three members are the most senior among all members and have guided us significantly.
During the introductions and conversations with all respected members, Mr. Kourien proposed an interesting topic for us to debate.
Topic:
"Why Human as Resources." His view is totally different from other HR experts/scholars, and we have accepted his views for a national debate through this forum.
Now, my point is, why can't we say "Human Potential" instead of "Human Resource"? I would like to request all members to provide their views on this matter. I strongly advocate for "Human Potential" in place of "Human Resource."
Most welcome to all forum members to participate in this debate.
For Bangalore CiteHR members: In the next meeting, I will come with my topic for presentation.
Regards,
Sidhehswar
From India, Bangalore
Very good morning.
As Mr. Naren has already briefed about the Bangalore informal meet, there is nothing left for me to add. I appreciate the initiative taken by Mr. Naren, Mr. Rajaram, and Mr. Kourien. All three members are the most senior among all members and have guided us significantly.
During the introductions and conversations with all respected members, Mr. Kourien proposed an interesting topic for us to debate.
Topic:
"Why Human as Resources." His view is totally different from other HR experts/scholars, and we have accepted his views for a national debate through this forum.
Now, my point is, why can't we say "Human Potential" instead of "Human Resource"? I would like to request all members to provide their views on this matter. I strongly advocate for "Human Potential" in place of "Human Resource."
Most welcome to all forum members to participate in this debate.
For Bangalore CiteHR members: In the next meeting, I will come with my topic for presentation.
Regards,
Sidhehswar
From India, Bangalore
I believe we can definitely say "Human Potential" instead of "Human Resource". Probably it's convenient to use this term because we generally say this resource, that resource, and "Human Resource". Otherwise, HR is there to identify and bring out the potential of the "Human Resources".
From India, Gurgaon
From India, Gurgaon
Hi,
Sidhu says, "Human Resource Management -> Human Potential Management."
Prof. Lakshman says, "Human Resource Management -> Human Resource Wellness."
I believe the statements are almost interrelated.
Regards,
Swapna
From India, Hyderabad
Sidhu says, "Human Resource Management -> Human Potential Management."
Prof. Lakshman says, "Human Resource Management -> Human Resource Wellness."
I believe the statements are almost interrelated.
Regards,
Swapna
From India, Hyderabad
Hi all,
Though I am a new joiner to this site and have lesser experience than those who actually initiated the discussion, I would like to share my views.
We can refer to it as Human Potential because every individual possesses potential that stems from abilities and knowledge. However, in my opinion, we should continue to use the term Human Resources because resources aid us in achieving objectives. Not all resources are fully utilized, and not all resources prove fruitful for the organization.
The distinction lies in the fact that when we talk about potential, we typically anticipate something useful in the near future, whereas human resources encompass all individuals who can be made available to perform specific tasks.
We can also delve into the concept of a hard worker versus a smart worker, along with issues related to the term 'potential.'
That's my point of view. What do you all say?
Regards,
Ritu
From India, Gurgaon
Though I am a new joiner to this site and have lesser experience than those who actually initiated the discussion, I would like to share my views.
We can refer to it as Human Potential because every individual possesses potential that stems from abilities and knowledge. However, in my opinion, we should continue to use the term Human Resources because resources aid us in achieving objectives. Not all resources are fully utilized, and not all resources prove fruitful for the organization.
The distinction lies in the fact that when we talk about potential, we typically anticipate something useful in the near future, whereas human resources encompass all individuals who can be made available to perform specific tasks.
We can also delve into the concept of a hard worker versus a smart worker, along with issues related to the term 'potential.'
That's my point of view. What do you all say?
Regards,
Ritu
From India, Gurgaon
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.