Dear all, I am enclosing the Standing order for the reference, hope you will appreciate.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
201From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Shri Raghunath,
Thanks for the Standing orders. I have not gone through the entire document and probably will not be able to do so. However, on just perusal of the 'classification of employees', you included trainees and apprentices. Does it mean that you want to treat them as employees on the rolls of the company?
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Relations Advisor
Navi Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thanks for the Standing orders. I have not gone through the entire document and probably will not be able to do so. However, on just perusal of the 'classification of employees', you included trainees and apprentices. Does it mean that you want to treat them as employees on the rolls of the company?
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Relations Advisor
Navi Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Raghunath,
Truly commendable. In 9 pages, you have produced a comprehensive code covering all aspects, including the required amendments. However, a little more attention could be given to editing to erase the recurring misprint of 'the/she' repeatedly.
Once again, all kudos!
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Truly commendable. In 9 pages, you have produced a comprehensive code covering all aspects, including the required amendments. However, a little more attention could be given to editing to erase the recurring misprint of 'the/she' repeatedly.
Once again, all kudos!
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Raghunath,
After perusal of your draft, here are my observations:
The relevant rules in respect of your company - The Karnataka Industrial Employment (S.O.) Rules, 1961. Include all workmen as defined under Section 2(S) of the ID Act, 1947 to be more specific. Replace "Firm" with "Company," since your company is a Private Limited Company.
Regarding the "Transfer" clause - will the Certifying Authority permit for inclusion in S.O.? Specify/quantify subsistence allowance (Karnataka Subsistence Allowance Act & Rules are applicable only to establishments to whom the S.O. Act does not apply).
Thank you.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
After perusal of your draft, here are my observations:
The relevant rules in respect of your company - The Karnataka Industrial Employment (S.O.) Rules, 1961. Include all workmen as defined under Section 2(S) of the ID Act, 1947 to be more specific. Replace "Firm" with "Company," since your company is a Private Limited Company.
Regarding the "Transfer" clause - will the Certifying Authority permit for inclusion in S.O.? Specify/quantify subsistence allowance (Karnataka Subsistence Allowance Act & Rules are applicable only to establishments to whom the S.O. Act does not apply).
Thank you.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. Raghunanthan,
The document/draft on Standing Orders is good and covers all aspects. Beyond the suggestions by seniors, there are one or two errors in the misconduct rules, which are negligible but can be corrected before displaying them on notice boards, etc. Perhaps the misconduct rules can be debated if there are any unions in your factory.
Thank you.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The document/draft on Standing Orders is good and covers all aspects. Beyond the suggestions by seniors, there are one or two errors in the misconduct rules, which are negligible but can be corrected before displaying them on notice boards, etc. Perhaps the misconduct rules can be debated if there are any unions in your factory.
Thank you.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. Raghunanthan,
The document/draft on Standing Orders is good and covers all aspects. Beyond the suggestions by seniors, there are one or two small errors in the misconduct rules, which are negligible but can be corrected before displaying on notice boards, etc. Perhaps the misconduct rules can be debated if there are any unions in your factory.
Thank you.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The document/draft on Standing Orders is good and covers all aspects. Beyond the suggestions by seniors, there are one or two small errors in the misconduct rules, which are negligible but can be corrected before displaying on notice boards, etc. Perhaps the misconduct rules can be debated if there are any unions in your factory.
Thank you.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Join Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
Draft Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Punjab (Haryana Amendment) Rules 2018.docx