Employee Misconduct: Theft Incident
An employee was caught by a security guard while attempting to steal goods from the industry. When questioned by the HRM head, the worker admitted his mistake and provided a written confession. Now, the worker is expecting an apology from the HRM head.
Should the worker be terminated, or should any other action be taken against him? Please provide suggestions for disciplinary actions to be taken against the worker.
Regards,
Sagar
From India, Jalgaon
An employee was caught by a security guard while attempting to steal goods from the industry. When questioned by the HRM head, the worker admitted his mistake and provided a written confession. Now, the worker is expecting an apology from the HRM head.
Should the worker be terminated, or should any other action be taken against him? Please provide suggestions for disciplinary actions to be taken against the worker.
Regards,
Sagar
From India, Jalgaon
Termination is not the solution. In my view, you should call his family and discuss the matter with them in front of him. Don't terminate him; make him feel sorry in front of his family as well as HR that he was doing wrong. Then ask him, "Why should we not terminate you?"
Regards.
From India, Kota
Regards.
From India, Kota
In your case, even though the worker has accepted the apology in writing, you cannot directly terminate him. That would present a weak case in court from the employer's side. The worker may change his mind in court and claim that the employer obtained the written statement forcefully. Therefore, always bear in mind that any termination of a worker must be supported by a proper inquiry. Ensure that the documents are clear enough for the court to see that all necessary procedures were followed before termination.
If you intend to terminate him, my suggestion is to conduct a proper inquiry by an officer appointed by you. Ensure thorough documentation before proceeding with termination.
If you wish to retain him, conduct at least a departmental inquiry and issue a warning letter. However, ensure proper documentation in the departmental inquiry as well and keep it in his personal file for future reference.
Regards,
Arun J.
From India, Hyderabad
If you intend to terminate him, my suggestion is to conduct a proper inquiry by an officer appointed by you. Ensure thorough documentation before proceeding with termination.
If you wish to retain him, conduct at least a departmental inquiry and issue a warning letter. However, ensure proper documentation in the departmental inquiry as well and keep it in his personal file for future reference.
Regards,
Arun J.
From India, Hyderabad
Hello Meena, you can still take action and terminate them, but not right now. If the fraud occurred a few weeks or months ago, taking action so late may put you in a difficult position. The court will definitely question why action was delayed. The worker may challenge in court, claiming that management is acting intentionally.
Immediate Suspension and Enquiry
Next time you catch them, immediately suspend them pending an enquiry. Conduct a proper enquiry with your enquiry officer, including previous documents like warnings, statements from security guards, their apologies, etc. Compile a complete set of documents and then proceed with termination.
The court will recognize that in the previous fraud, you gave them a chance to improve, but they did not. This demonstrates that you have adhered to the natural justice act in this case. Your case will be stronger in court even if they challenge the termination, and your supporting documents will assist you.
Regards,
Arun J.
From India, Hyderabad
Immediate Suspension and Enquiry
Next time you catch them, immediately suspend them pending an enquiry. Conduct a proper enquiry with your enquiry officer, including previous documents like warnings, statements from security guards, their apologies, etc. Compile a complete set of documents and then proceed with termination.
The court will recognize that in the previous fraud, you gave them a chance to improve, but they did not. This demonstrates that you have adhered to the natural justice act in this case. Your case will be stronger in court even if they challenge the termination, and your supporting documents will assist you.
Regards,
Arun J.
From India, Hyderabad
Hitting the head is not the solution to every problem. Behind every action, there is a reason. Only when you know the correct decision, the action will be appropriate, and the result will be good.
The person who took this action in the company surely knows the result as well. So, if he made a mistake due to a genuine problem, HRM should consider that and give him another chance along with an apology letter. However, if he is habitual in making such mistakes, strict action should be taken.
Regards,
Kasim Ansari
From India, Mumbai
The person who took this action in the company surely knows the result as well. So, if he made a mistake due to a genuine problem, HRM should consider that and give him another chance along with an apology letter. However, if he is habitual in making such mistakes, strict action should be taken.
Regards,
Kasim Ansari
From India, Mumbai
Discipline in the Industry: A Necessity
Discipline in an industry is a must, and unless this is ensured, the development and growth of the industry will be directly impacted. Legally speaking, though the aggrieved employee has accepted the guilt, punishment needs to be imposed subject to holding a proper and fair domestic enquiry and findings of the enquiry officer.
Steps to Frame a Charge Sheet
Further technically, a charge sheet should be framed based on the written complaint from the security guard who was instrumental in detecting the theft, not merely on the admission by the aggrieved employee. This is because it could be likely that the said employee, during the enquiry proceedings, might go for a defense, saying under stress, a written undertaking was taken by the management, and the decision in the court of law, if taken up, might go in favor of the employee.
Action Based on Misconduct
Once the charge is established, action needs to be taken based on the punishment guidelines applicable to that industry as per the nature of misconducts. If the employee, after his written or verbal apology, is excused, then it will affect the discipline of the industry, and other coworkers might continue to indulge in these sorts of misconducts as well.
Regards,
B.K. Mohanty
Director
Cypress Management Associates
[Phone Number Removed For Privacy Reasons]
From India, Bhubaneswar
Discipline in an industry is a must, and unless this is ensured, the development and growth of the industry will be directly impacted. Legally speaking, though the aggrieved employee has accepted the guilt, punishment needs to be imposed subject to holding a proper and fair domestic enquiry and findings of the enquiry officer.
Steps to Frame a Charge Sheet
Further technically, a charge sheet should be framed based on the written complaint from the security guard who was instrumental in detecting the theft, not merely on the admission by the aggrieved employee. This is because it could be likely that the said employee, during the enquiry proceedings, might go for a defense, saying under stress, a written undertaking was taken by the management, and the decision in the court of law, if taken up, might go in favor of the employee.
Action Based on Misconduct
Once the charge is established, action needs to be taken based on the punishment guidelines applicable to that industry as per the nature of misconducts. If the employee, after his written or verbal apology, is excused, then it will affect the discipline of the industry, and other coworkers might continue to indulge in these sorts of misconducts as well.
Regards,
B.K. Mohanty
Director
Cypress Management Associates
[Phone Number Removed For Privacy Reasons]
From India, Bhubaneswar
How long ago was this incident? If it was recent, i.e., within legal limits, go ahead and start disciplinary action. I am not suggesting termination, as without disciplinary action, you cannot decide what action to take. Based on witness accounts and the reply given by him to the notice, you can take action as deemed fit. Theft is a serious offense, more in the realms of moral turpitude; hence, strict action can be taken the first time itself.
Regards,
Manoj
From India, Delhi
Regards,
Manoj
From India, Delhi
You have not mentioned the material stolen and its cost to the company. Whatever it is, it depends on his length of service, past disciplinary record, and the present misconduct. Not necessarily termination (even after an inquiry) or suspension or warning.
Further, I sincerely feel, who was having custody of that material, how that person was careless, why he should not also be punished? Why only the worker?
Regards,
Vibhakar Ramtirthkar
SVR Associates
HR Consultant
From India, Pune
Further, I sincerely feel, who was having custody of that material, how that person was careless, why he should not also be punished? Why only the worker?
Regards,
Vibhakar Ramtirthkar
SVR Associates
HR Consultant
From India, Pune
Importance of Discipline in the Organization
Discipline in the organization is of prime importance. If you let this person off, it will set a precedent, and any future cases will have to be given the same treatment. Please initiate a domestic inquiry and take appropriate action as per the inquiry report.
Regards
From India, Chennai
Discipline in the organization is of prime importance. If you let this person off, it will set a precedent, and any future cases will have to be given the same treatment. Please initiate a domestic inquiry and take appropriate action as per the inquiry report.
Regards
From India, Chennai
Strengthening Your Code of Conduct
Terminating an employee's job is not the issue. What this shows is that you may need to strengthen your policy and procedures, known as a Code of Conduct, containing all the rules that everyone, including management, must abide by. It also contains penalties ranging from verbal warnings to written warnings to the dismissal of an employee. In this code, there should be some incidents, very serious ones, that may result in instant dismissal, such as gross misconduct, fraud, theft, sexual assault, fighting, and so on.
Designating Investigators and Conducting Hearings
With your code in place, you need to have people designated as investigators who will investigate each time an offense is committed. Once they investigate, there should be a hearing where the case is heard by someone different from the one who investigated. Once the case is heard, the person should be able to make a decision, either termination or a final warning, depending on what offense has been committed.
Training and Implementation
You need to train everyone once you have this in place—employees, trade unions, managers—all will need to be trained on what happens when this occurs, who raises the complaint, when the complaint should be raised, when it should expire, who investigates, who hears the case, who witnesses, how appeals are held, who hears the appeals, and so on. With such a system, discipline should not be a problem, and an employee who has been stealing from the company will not come back and request from HR for discovering that he has been stealing. This is not acceptable.
From United Kingdom, London
Terminating an employee's job is not the issue. What this shows is that you may need to strengthen your policy and procedures, known as a Code of Conduct, containing all the rules that everyone, including management, must abide by. It also contains penalties ranging from verbal warnings to written warnings to the dismissal of an employee. In this code, there should be some incidents, very serious ones, that may result in instant dismissal, such as gross misconduct, fraud, theft, sexual assault, fighting, and so on.
Designating Investigators and Conducting Hearings
With your code in place, you need to have people designated as investigators who will investigate each time an offense is committed. Once they investigate, there should be a hearing where the case is heard by someone different from the one who investigated. Once the case is heard, the person should be able to make a decision, either termination or a final warning, depending on what offense has been committed.
Training and Implementation
You need to train everyone once you have this in place—employees, trade unions, managers—all will need to be trained on what happens when this occurs, who raises the complaint, when the complaint should be raised, when it should expire, who investigates, who hears the case, who witnesses, how appeals are held, who hears the appeals, and so on. With such a system, discipline should not be a problem, and an employee who has been stealing from the company will not come back and request from HR for discovering that he has been stealing. This is not acceptable.
From United Kingdom, London
Mr. Vibhkar, Mr. Vibhkar is correct. One should always ensure that "Punishment should be proportionate to the gravity of misconduct." This means, as the act suggests, you cannot hang a person for stealing an apple (it's just an example). Here, the gravity of misconduct is very small compared to a punishment like hanging.
Likewise, before terminating, you must consider the employee's length of service and the gravity of misconduct. For example, if we have caught him stealing goods worth Rs. 200 and he has worked for the company for 5 years without any previous misconduct or disciplinary actions, termination may not be justifiable. There are other ways, such as stopping his increment for 1 or 2 years, etc.
Therefore, one should resort to termination only if that person is harmful to the company and the gravity of misconduct is very serious in nature.
Regards,
Arun J.
From India, Hyderabad
Likewise, before terminating, you must consider the employee's length of service and the gravity of misconduct. For example, if we have caught him stealing goods worth Rs. 200 and he has worked for the company for 5 years without any previous misconduct or disciplinary actions, termination may not be justifiable. There are other ways, such as stopping his increment for 1 or 2 years, etc.
Therefore, one should resort to termination only if that person is harmful to the company and the gravity of misconduct is very serious in nature.
Regards,
Arun J.
From India, Hyderabad
Committing theft is a serious misconduct that warrants severe punishment, including dismissal. However, as he has accepted his misconduct and appealed for an excuse, you can consider taking action by demoting his position and salary or stopping increments for two to three years as punishment after consulting with your employer.
Regards,
D. Gurumurthy
HR & IR Consultant, Hyderabad.
From India, Hyderabad
Regards,
D. Gurumurthy
HR & IR Consultant, Hyderabad.
From India, Hyderabad
Even if we give him a second chance, he cannot work in that company properly as the guilt will kill him, and moreover, the incident can be repeated. I have seen a similar case where the company gave an employee a second chance, but he copied valuable data from the server and moved to another company. It is a RISK - and it can result in LOSS or PROFIT, purely depending on the company's position to challenge the risk.
From India, Hyderabad
From India, Hyderabad
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.