Though your probation period was extended from time to time as per the terms of the contract of employment on the ground of performance, you were neither terminated by the Management nor confirmed till you opted to resign. Therefore, still you are in the service of the establishment as a probationer only and as such you are bound to comply with the notice clause of the unilateral termination of the contract of employment. It is, however, up to the Management to waive it completely or relax it like the way they reacted to your resignation. Reading in between the lines, I can understand your tacit acceptance of the performance appraisal by the Management. Better accept the offer by the Company and get yourself smoothly relieved so as to get another job suiting your employability.
23rd October 2018 From India, Salem
Though the company didn't terminate my services but extending my probation beyond what was agreed upon is irrational and illegal perhaps. I agree that I still am obliged to the service of the company as a probationer but the company has unscrupulously prolonged probation of about 40 people, including me. While on Probation, I am not even entitled to appraisals, increments and other benefits.
Raising this issue, the company has issued back-dated confirmation letter to 39 of them, while trying to terminate me by just giving a relieve letter and not experience letter; "smooth exit" they say.
23rd October 2018 From India
How can the policies of the company be different for individual cases. How can the company strictly follow the rules in some case, while cool-off policies in others?
23rd October 2018 From India
In this forum, the questions raised in a thread are answered by the readers based only on the factual information provided by the writer. If some pieces of vital information relating to the questions are withheld by the writer for obvious reasons or revealed on piece meal basis in his successive posts, some of the earlier answers may become inappropriate or even wrong. Therefore, the presentation of all the factual information in a single go without any omission by the writer alone can enable the readers to suggest the answers to the queries effectively.
Coming to your problem: Probation, being a definite period of trial to assess the suitability of the new recruit to hold the position substantively, enables the employer to simply terminate his services at the end of the period specified on the reason of documented unsatisfactory performance or extend the period of probation for some more time,if any so mentioned in the employment contract. If he is allowed to continue his services even past the extended period of probation without any explicit orders of confirmation, his status of employment is probationer only in the absence a specific clause enabling deeming confirmation in the contract. The legality or otherwise of such a situation depends upon one's perception. The employer's act of keeping the employee still in service as a probationer again and again despite his perceived unsuitability may be viewed as a measure of sympathy or as an act of unfair labor practice. The secret is best known only to the concerned employer and the employee. When the fact remains that you were a star performer even as a probationer and along with you some 40 probationers faced the same fate of extended probations beyond the limit prescribed, what prevented you from agitating such a practice? When the rest 39 were confirmed back-dated, why you alone were chosen to send out with just a relieving letter remains unexplained. Any way, now, only two options are before you - one is fighting the case with moral courage and the other is to wriggle out of this bad situation and unscrupulous Company tactfully to get better employment elsewhere.
I request you to treat this as my reply to your private message also.
24th October 2018 From India, Salem
I didn't present all vital information in a single article to keep the brevity and encourage readability of the whole thread.
It is apparent that our prolonged extension was an act of unfair labour practice by the employer. Though almost each of the 40 guys had same grievance, only I raised a concern to the HRD and subsequently resigned from my services citing insecurity and unnecessary delays in the process. During this course, everyone including me (not only the rest 39) was given with a back dated confirmation letter—though I had not accepted it till date for good moral reasons.
Perhaps I was chosen to send out with just a relieving letter because I had agitated and caused to put a break on employer's unfair act. I had few valid arguments to prove my point and bring the employer on the back-foot that is, receding from demand of full notice period/compensation. What more can the employer do to compromise on the one hand, while appear strict on the other?
Inline to your advice, I have tactfully exited the company (without paying/serving notice) to pursue a better opportunity elsewhere. Fighting a legal case was my last resort; had the issue not settled amicably I would have gone to labour court as I knew my stand is correct—also validated by you, now.
Please accept my sincere gratitude for sharing your views on this case.
25th October 2018 From India