Management told her that salary will only be transferred when she submit her resignation.
Please Guide.... Awaiting for your early response....
From India, Delhi



Similar practice is being followed by so many small companies. Although, this type of behavior is totally unethical, I would like to suggest to resign with proper notice period as per the terms of employment and get away from such bad company. In fact, these type of companies and management do not require hard working / honest / deserving candidates, neither they believe in maintaining a good professional relationship during and after the employee tenure with the company.
Regards,
Prabhat
From India, Mumbai
Wait for 1 week post the delivery of the letter. When you register AD, the post master also gives you the details on date of delivery and if or not the letter was received by concerned person, who received it and an acknowledgement slip is signed by the person taking delivery.
This will prove the fact that your friend made an attempt to ask the persons about the reason. Also mention in the letter dates and time when s/he called up the HR and/or other authorities and the response s/he got - No answer, busy tone, etc.
Not hearing from them for 7-10 days post delivery of letter, approach the labor office and meet the Officer and share the concern.
From India, Mumbai
To quote your conclusion -
To be very honest, I do not approve what the HR of the said firm did. But to share the knowledge, I would like to mention you that there are different reasons that a company would force the employees to put their papers down like -
1. They think the person is not contributing much and even after giving several hints and warnings do not improve. In such case, a company is being actually good for the person by not terminating and asking for resignation instead so that his image for future employment is not tarnished by the word - TERMINATED
2. The company is running in loss and cannot manage the workforce. They not only have to reduce the manpower but also decide if they should continue the working.
These are the two scenes I can think of.
We cannot comment on whose fault it was because we do not know the complete story.
We do not know the company's side story.
We do not know the whole story from the employee's side as well.
How can we conclude if or not what the company did was fair.
From India, Mumbai
The company mangement has made it abundantly clear to your friend by their conduct that they do not want to continue her at any rate. Though it is discourteous and unethical and speaks volumes of the company's work culture, it is advisable to resign from such companies with a proper relieving letter and look for better companies instead of pestring them for divulging the reason and pusrsue a confronting option. It is said that discretion is better part of valour.However she shall make it sure that she gets the relieving letter.
B.Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advsior
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
I am with B.Saikumar--when the message is absolutely clear--IRRESPECTIVE of whether one agrees with it or not--your friend would only be wasting her time & effort. Let her put it to better use.
However, I suggest MORE precaution on the part of your friend.
Suggest her to inform the company that she will EXCHANGE her Resignation with the Salary cheque AND Relieving/Experience Letter. If you go thru some of the threads in CiteHR, you will notice many companies playing delaying tactics once they get the resignation.
Rgds,
TS
From India, Hyderabad
I do not agree with views expressed by Ankita.Whatever may be the reason it is very natural to expect transparency in top management's conduct.If they feel that your friend's performance was not upto the mark then this must be reflected in the appraisal report.Secondly if the company is financially in a bad position there is no reason to hide this fact from an employee.However as Mr Tajsateesh has said it is evident that the story of your friend with this company is over.So do the best.Trade the resignation letter against all the dues and quit.But after that do not forget to bring the entire episode to the notice of the labour commissioner so that the company may learn a lesson or two !
S.K.Limaye/MBA
From India, New Delhi
From India, Salem
1) The employee concerned is a HR Executive and hence not a workman to compalin to the Labour Commissioner about any matter concerning her to invoke his jurisdiction.
2) Assuming that she succeds to prove that she is a workman, there cannot be any dispute about her cessation of job as the same has been brought about by her reisgnation but not by employer's arbitrary termination and hence in all probability the complaint will not be taken cognisance of.
3) If she resorts to such action after resigning, thinking that it is her turn now to embarass the company, it may invite reprisals from the ex-employer who may send some negative feed back to her current employer to embarass her. It is advisable for both the parties to respect the win-win situation negotiated between them and do not resort to any act to disturb the understanding as it may hurt the interess of both, more so those of the employee.
B.Saikumar
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
B.Saikumar
HR & Labour Law advsior
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai