Dear All,
In a hospital, a nurse lost her vision due to a sudden burst of an oxygen cylinder. She is covered by ESI benefits. Is the employer liable for benefits to this employee as per the Workmen's Compensation Act? Please advise.
Victor
From India, Kottayam
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
In a hospital, a nurse lost her vision due to a sudden burst of an oxygen cylinder. She is covered by ESI benefits. Is the employer liable for benefits to this employee as per the Workmen's Compensation Act? Please advise.
Victor
From India, Kottayam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Victor, Mr. Nimesh has rightly stated that the employee who is covered under the ESI Act, 1948 is not entitled to receive any compensation under the WC Act, 1923, now known as the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923. Section 53 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 debars the insured employee from receiving any compensation under any other law, which may be read as follows:
Sec. 53. Bar against receiving or recovery of compensation or damages under any other law.—An insured person or his dependents shall not be entitled to receive or recover, whether from the employer of the insured person or from any other person, any compensation or damages under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (8 of 1923), or any other law for the time being in force or otherwise, in respect of an employment injury sustained by the insured person as an employee under this Act.
Regards,
R.N.Khola
http://www.skylarkassociates.com/
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
424Sec. 53. Bar against receiving or recovery of compensation or damages under any other law.—An insured person or his dependents shall not be entitled to receive or recover, whether from the employer of the insured person or from any other person, any compensation or damages under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (8 of 1923), or any other law for the time being in force or otherwise, in respect of an employment injury sustained by the insured person as an employee under this Act.
Regards,
R.N.Khola
http://www.skylarkassociates.com/
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
Dear Sir,
Other than ESIC-covered employees, to whom the Workmen's Compensation Act is applicable, is there any salary limit for applicability? Or can it be applicable to all employees irrespective of a salary limit?
Regards,
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Other than ESIC-covered employees, to whom the Workmen's Compensation Act is applicable, is there any salary limit for applicability? Or can it be applicable to all employees irrespective of a salary limit?
Regards,
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Victor, you have a very interesting question and incident. Since you have received the correct reply to your question, I will not go into it. As I have taken up a study on the safety of hospital workers, could you please provide more details of the incident, such as when and where it happened, the name, age, and other details of the victim, whether there was a loss in both eyes or just one, and whether the vision loss is total or partial? Additionally, in which state did this incident occur? In Gujarat, the ESI Act is not applicable to private nursing homes. Could you clarify the state where this incident took place? I also kindly request other readers to share information on accidents similar to this if they come across any.
Thank you.
From India, Coimbatore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thank you.
From India, Coimbatore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Since she is covered under the ESI Scheme, she will not be entitled to nor would the employer be liable for compensation under the Workman’s Compensation Act. Vasant Nair
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
She is 27 years old with a salary of $7,880.00. The incident occurred when she was about to open/manage an oxygen cylinder for official purposes due to the absence of the operator. As a result, her right eye has been permanently lost. The incident took place on the 23rd of July 2010, a Friday, around 10:00 PM, precisely at 9:53 PM.
She is from Kerala, and the name of the hospital where she received treatment cannot be disclosed due to technical reasons.
Thank you.
From India, Kottayam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
She is from Kerala, and the name of the hospital where she received treatment cannot be disclosed due to technical reasons.
Thank you.
From India, Kottayam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
According to the Employee's Compensation Act of 1923, the compensation part is okay as per the formulas for industrial accidents. Furthermore, is an injured employee eligible for any other compensation, such as special leaves for the period of treatment, reimbursement of hospitalization expenses, etc.? Additionally, can an injured employee avail of eligible leaves like CLs, ELs, or SLs? Should the attendance of the injured person be maintained as loss of pay days for the period of treatment?
Regards,
Venkat
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards,
Venkat
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thank you so much for the information. This is very useful. If the victim needs any help dealing with the compensation issue, we will be glad to provide the right advice, which we offer for free. If she is not happy with the decision of the Medical Board, either regarding the amount of the compensation or its applicability, she has the right to approach the Medical Appeal Tribunal constituted under the ESI Act.
Regards
From India, Coimbatore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards
From India, Coimbatore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Victor, as a safety professional, more questions have come to my mind regarding the incident you narrated. I would be highly obliged if you could help me gather more information for my questions:
1. What caused the eye injury? Was it a splash of oxygen released from the cylinder, a splinter from the cylinder, or the tools she used to open the valve that injured the eye?
2. Did the cylinder burst, or did the valve assembly come off from the cylinder threads while the cylinder remained intact?
3. How quickly did she receive first aid treatment? Was she admitted to the same hospital for treatment?
Thank you in anticipation.
From India, Coimbatore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1. What caused the eye injury? Was it a splash of oxygen released from the cylinder, a splinter from the cylinder, or the tools she used to open the valve that injured the eye?
2. Did the cylinder burst, or did the valve assembly come off from the cylinder threads while the cylinder remained intact?
3. How quickly did she receive first aid treatment? Was she admitted to the same hospital for treatment?
Thank you in anticipation.
From India, Coimbatore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Victor, Since she is covered under the ESI Act, she would be entitled to Disability Benefit (pension) under the ESI Act. Assuming that she has lost one eye without affecting the other eye, her disability should be 40%. According to the calculation of Disability Benefit under the ESI Rules, she is entitled to a monthly pension of 30 to 32% of her average wages for the last 6 months. If her average monthly wages were Rs. 7800, she should receive a monthly pension of around Rs. 2400 for the rest of her life. The provisions of the ESI Act are considerably superior to those of the Workmen's Compensation Act. Please report the accident to the ESI authorities as soon as possible.
Thank you.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thank you.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The beneficiary under this Act is the employee. It applies to the employments as shown along with the definition of the employee as per section 2(dd) & schedule II of this amended Act. You must have reviewed the changes. The definition of the workman has been replaced by employee. The definition of employee as shown at section 2(dd) & amended schedule II of the amended Act is attached herewith for information. Necessary changes can be noticed by this attachment.
Entitlement of Supervisory, Administrative, and Managerial Staff
Now, coming to the main point of whether the supervisory, administrative, managerial staff, and officers are also entitled to receive compensation in case there is any employment injury under this Act. While examining this matter, we have to go through the definition of employee & schedule II. For instance, section 2(dd)(ii)(b) says that 'a captain or other member of the crew of an aircraft' is covered for getting benefits under this Act. Schedule II para (ii) says that any person "employed, in any premises wherein or within the precincts whereof a manufacturing process as defined in clause (k) of section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948), is being carried on, or in any kind of work whatsoever incidental to or connected with any such manufacturing process or with the article made, whether or not employment in any such work is within such premises or precincts and steam, water or other mechanical power or electrical power is used."
This shows that all employees, regardless of their status, if employed in the premises where any manufacturing process is carried on as per the definition of the Factories Act (sec 2(k)), will be covered for getting benefits under this Act. Hence, we are to go through the definition of employee & the Schedule II for finalizing the matter of getting benefits under this Act by any person.
Opinion/comments submitted as requested.
Regards,
R.N.Khola
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Entitlement of Supervisory, Administrative, and Managerial Staff
Now, coming to the main point of whether the supervisory, administrative, managerial staff, and officers are also entitled to receive compensation in case there is any employment injury under this Act. While examining this matter, we have to go through the definition of employee & schedule II. For instance, section 2(dd)(ii)(b) says that 'a captain or other member of the crew of an aircraft' is covered for getting benefits under this Act. Schedule II para (ii) says that any person "employed, in any premises wherein or within the precincts whereof a manufacturing process as defined in clause (k) of section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948), is being carried on, or in any kind of work whatsoever incidental to or connected with any such manufacturing process or with the article made, whether or not employment in any such work is within such premises or precincts and steam, water or other mechanical power or electrical power is used."
This shows that all employees, regardless of their status, if employed in the premises where any manufacturing process is carried on as per the definition of the Factories Act (sec 2(k)), will be covered for getting benefits under this Act. Hence, we are to go through the definition of employee & the Schedule II for finalizing the matter of getting benefits under this Act by any person.
Opinion/comments submitted as requested.
Regards,
R.N.Khola
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. Khola,
I can understand from your interpretation of the definition, but this is only in cases where there is a manufacturing process/production, etc., just in cases of a factory.
What about applicability to Managers/Supervisors/Administrators, etc., employed in the service industry or establishments covered under the Shop Act, about which nothing has been defined in Schedule II or the Act?
What has been deleted from Schedule II in each definition is "working in a clerical capacity, etc." almost in each clause.
As per your interpretation, "Employee" means:
Section 2(dd) “employee” means a person, who is—
(iii) employed in any such capacity as is specified in Schedule II, whether the contract of employment was made before or after the passing of this Act and whether such contract is expressed or implied, oral or in writing; but does not include any person working in the capacity of a member of the Armed Forces of the Union.
Employee means any person employed in any such capacity as specified in Schedule II. Although to some extent, I accept this as "Any person employed in any such capacity." And all managers, supervisors, etc., are employed by the employer, so it shall be applicable.
But the phrase "Employed in any such capacity as is specified in Schedule II" makes it doubtful and only applicable to persons specified in Schedule II, not as a whole.
Earlier it was applicable to workmen only. In my opinion, it is still applicable to persons defined in Schedule II, not as a general rule.
No major change. A single word cannot change the intent of the legislation.
Solicit your further view on this.
Regards
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I can understand from your interpretation of the definition, but this is only in cases where there is a manufacturing process/production, etc., just in cases of a factory.
What about applicability to Managers/Supervisors/Administrators, etc., employed in the service industry or establishments covered under the Shop Act, about which nothing has been defined in Schedule II or the Act?
What has been deleted from Schedule II in each definition is "working in a clerical capacity, etc." almost in each clause.
As per your interpretation, "Employee" means:
Section 2(dd) “employee” means a person, who is—
(iii) employed in any such capacity as is specified in Schedule II, whether the contract of employment was made before or after the passing of this Act and whether such contract is expressed or implied, oral or in writing; but does not include any person working in the capacity of a member of the Armed Forces of the Union.
Employee means any person employed in any such capacity as specified in Schedule II. Although to some extent, I accept this as "Any person employed in any such capacity." And all managers, supervisors, etc., are employed by the employer, so it shall be applicable.
But the phrase "Employed in any such capacity as is specified in Schedule II" makes it doubtful and only applicable to persons specified in Schedule II, not as a whole.
Earlier it was applicable to workmen only. In my opinion, it is still applicable to persons defined in Schedule II, not as a general rule.
No major change. A single word cannot change the intent of the legislation.
Solicit your further view on this.
Regards
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
If the ESI Act is applicable, then an employee cannot claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act. However, if the employee is not covered under ESI (salary Rs. 15,000 or more), then the employee can claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, despite the establishment being covered under the ESI Act.
Regards,
Juned Akhtar
From India, Faridabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards,
Juned Akhtar
From India, Faridabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I am working as an HR in a new company that is not covered under ESIC. What should I do according to the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923? Could you kindly suggest the registration procedure, necessary forms, where to submit them, and how to calculate the compensation? Is there a specific formula for this?
Regards,
Ashok
From India, Kolhapur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards,
Ashok
From India, Kolhapur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thank you all for your assistance. I would also like to inquire about any specific categories of employees outlined in this Act to whom the Act applies. Are managers and upper-level categories also included under this Act? Please advise.
Best Regards,
Sandesh
From Australia
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Best Regards,
Sandesh
From Australia
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear sir, Can you tell me what is the procedure of WC and ESI. Plese sir it is very important for me. Regards, Suresh
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
in case employees are covered under ESIC .. do we need to wc policy mandatory.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
No. Even otherwise, if your unit is not covered under ESI and covered under EC Act, then also you are not compelled to have WC policy (EC policy). In one or two states, by notification in the official gazette, it has been made compulsory to have EC policy.
R N KHOLA
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
R N KHOLA
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
The Workmen's Compensation Act 1923.pdf
Workmen's Compensation Act 1923.doc