Supreme Court Embraces Technology in Judicial Proceedings
The Supreme Court on Friday decided to use technology more in judicial proceedings, keeping in mind the prevailing COVID-19 situation. The court directed that court summons and notices can now be served on persons through "emails, fax, and instant messaging applications" like 'WhatsApp'. The top court had earlier taken suo motu (on its own) cognizance of the difficulties faced by lawyers and litigants during the lockdown due to COVID-19. It had decided to extend the period of limitation prescribed under laws for initiating arbitral proceedings and cheque bounce cases with effect from March 15 until further orders.
A bench comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices R Subhash Reddy and A S Bopanna passed the order on the plea filed by Attorney General K K Venugopal in the case. "For services of notices and summons, pleadings, it has been seen that it was not possible during lockdown to visit postal offices... we direct that such service (of notices and summons) may be done by email, fax, or through an instant messenger service," the bench said, refraining from using the name 'WhatsApp' in the order. It referred to the example of 'Xerox' and said that the name of the company has been used to convey the meaning of 'photostate'.
The top court allayed the apprehension of Venugopal, who was "not comfortable" with the service of summons and notices through WhatsApp as it has been a "completely encrypted platform". It said that the "blue tick" feature of the messaging application can be used to prove the service of the court's notices under the Evidence Act. If the application is deactivated, then it cannot be proven, and hence such services can be used.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
191The Supreme Court on Friday decided to use technology more in judicial proceedings, keeping in mind the prevailing COVID-19 situation. The court directed that court summons and notices can now be served on persons through "emails, fax, and instant messaging applications" like 'WhatsApp'. The top court had earlier taken suo motu (on its own) cognizance of the difficulties faced by lawyers and litigants during the lockdown due to COVID-19. It had decided to extend the period of limitation prescribed under laws for initiating arbitral proceedings and cheque bounce cases with effect from March 15 until further orders.
A bench comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices R Subhash Reddy and A S Bopanna passed the order on the plea filed by Attorney General K K Venugopal in the case. "For services of notices and summons, pleadings, it has been seen that it was not possible during lockdown to visit postal offices... we direct that such service (of notices and summons) may be done by email, fax, or through an instant messenger service," the bench said, refraining from using the name 'WhatsApp' in the order. It referred to the example of 'Xerox' and said that the name of the company has been used to convey the meaning of 'photostate'.
The top court allayed the apprehension of Venugopal, who was "not comfortable" with the service of summons and notices through WhatsApp as it has been a "completely encrypted platform". It said that the "blue tick" feature of the messaging application can be used to prove the service of the court's notices under the Evidence Act. If the application is deactivated, then it cannot be proven, and hence such services can be used.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
SUPREME COURT DECISION ON BASIC WAGES.pdf