Dear Seniors,
We are in the Textile industry background, so we offer a fixed salary that depends on the trainees' progression to skilled employees. In this scenario, we have recently adjusted the salary scale. The new salary scale reflects a reduction in the salary range compared to the old one (for example, Rs350-Rs345). However, this adjustment does not impact the monthly take-home pay of employees. When comparing the old Take-Home Pay (THP) to the new THP, the salary range is actually increased. This increase is because we have deducted other benefits by a lesser amount compared to before (e.g., food, transport).
Is there any requirement for employee approval when fixing the salary in this manner? Your valuable comments and suggestions are appreciated.
Thank you.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
1We are in the Textile industry background, so we offer a fixed salary that depends on the trainees' progression to skilled employees. In this scenario, we have recently adjusted the salary scale. The new salary scale reflects a reduction in the salary range compared to the old one (for example, Rs350-Rs345). However, this adjustment does not impact the monthly take-home pay of employees. When comparing the old Take-Home Pay (THP) to the new THP, the salary range is actually increased. This increase is because we have deducted other benefits by a lesser amount compared to before (e.g., food, transport).
Is there any requirement for employee approval when fixing the salary in this manner? Your valuable comments and suggestions are appreciated.
Thank you.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi, Please issue revised salary structure to all employees and get their consent in the copy of the same.
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi Dinesh,
It's necessary that either the concurrence of employees concerned or a tripartite agreement is obtained if they are covered under a 'unionized' system when considering any changes in emoluments. While there is no need for any such precondition when increasing emoluments, on the contrary, proper agreement is essential when emoluments are reduced. I would suggest that you should at least issue individual letters to all concerned, inviting their comments on your proposals, consider the responses, and act accordingly to avert complications in due course.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
It's necessary that either the concurrence of employees concerned or a tripartite agreement is obtained if they are covered under a 'unionized' system when considering any changes in emoluments. While there is no need for any such precondition when increasing emoluments, on the contrary, proper agreement is essential when emoluments are reduced. I would suggest that you should at least issue individual letters to all concerned, inviting their comments on your proposals, consider the responses, and act accordingly to avert complications in due course.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear professionals, Thanks for your valuable reply Regards, Dineshkumar.N
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi Dinesh,
What you have to examine is, from the point of view of:
1) total emoluments, whether more or less, if less is not likely to be accepted - please ensure adherence to minimum wages as stipulated by the state govt.;
2) take-home pay, if THP is more not likely to invite murmurs from the concerned;
3) if reduction in basic wages/downward revision, which inter alia is likely to affect the contribution to EPF - under EPF Act, any revision in basic wages with a view to reduce the contribution to EPF is not permissible. Maybe, due to the upward revision in basic wages, deduction towards EPF is likely to be more resulting in lower THP, which the concerned employees would agitate;
4) keeping 'basic wages' at par but altering other allowances like HRA, conveyance, medical allowance, etc., may be affected. If the policy on this will have the concurrence of employees/union, it may not pose problems to implement.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
What you have to examine is, from the point of view of:
1) total emoluments, whether more or less, if less is not likely to be accepted - please ensure adherence to minimum wages as stipulated by the state govt.;
2) take-home pay, if THP is more not likely to invite murmurs from the concerned;
3) if reduction in basic wages/downward revision, which inter alia is likely to affect the contribution to EPF - under EPF Act, any revision in basic wages with a view to reduce the contribution to EPF is not permissible. Maybe, due to the upward revision in basic wages, deduction towards EPF is likely to be more resulting in lower THP, which the concerned employees would agitate;
4) keeping 'basic wages' at par but altering other allowances like HRA, conveyance, medical allowance, etc., may be affected. If the policy on this will have the concurrence of employees/union, it may not pose problems to implement.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Join Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
Change in Salary structure & Nomenclature.do c
Salary Structure.zip