Dear Sirs,
Please find the recent judgment of the Honorable High Court of Andhra Pradesh holding that ESI contributions need not be paid on conveyance allowance.
Thanks & Regards,
C. NIRANJAN RAO
Advocate
HIG-II, BLOCK NO.22, FLAT NO.8,
BAGH LINGAMPALLY, HYDERABAD.
PH: 040 66827291 (O) 9848050875 (M)
Email: niranjanraoassociates@gmail.com
Welcome to HR Chambers Outsourcing Pvt Ltd.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
4Please find the recent judgment of the Honorable High Court of Andhra Pradesh holding that ESI contributions need not be paid on conveyance allowance.
Thanks & Regards,
C. NIRANJAN RAO
Advocate
HIG-II, BLOCK NO.22, FLAT NO.8,
BAGH LINGAMPALLY, HYDERABAD.
PH: 040 66827291 (O) 9848050875 (M)
Email: niranjanraoassociates@gmail.com
Welcome to HR Chambers Outsourcing Pvt Ltd.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi Niranjan, I think as per Section 2(9) and under Section 2(22) of the ESI Act, conveyance allowance was excluded from the definition of wage, so it was not part of ESI contribution. Correct me if I am wrong.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Jkhr, If the Conveyance Allowance is directly related to expenditure incurred in travelling then ESI is not payable otherwise ESI is payable. Regards, SC
From India, Thane
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Thane
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Page No. 7 has been repeated, and page No. 8, presumably the page on which the Order is passed, is not available. Please check and send it again.
There is a difference between Travelling Allowance and Conveyance Allowance. The former is paid at a fixed rate depending on the kilometers traveled or the class in which the journey was undertaken, whether from residence to office and back or for any official visit. In contrast, conveyance allowance is a fixed sum. If we say that it is a payment made to employees to commute to and from residence, it cannot be uniform, as all employees of a particular pay scale may not reside in the same place and may not incur the same amount. This implies it is a part of the salary only.
The above statement reflects my perception of it. There may be differences of opinion.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
There is a difference between Travelling Allowance and Conveyance Allowance. The former is paid at a fixed rate depending on the kilometers traveled or the class in which the journey was undertaken, whether from residence to office and back or for any official visit. In contrast, conveyance allowance is a fixed sum. If we say that it is a payment made to employees to commute to and from residence, it cannot be uniform, as all employees of a particular pay scale may not reside in the same place and may not incur the same amount. This implies it is a part of the salary only.
The above statement reflects my perception of it. There may be differences of opinion.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear All, Mr. Madhu is absolutely right. All Allowances are part of Salary, while all expenses which are reimbursed are not. Regards, SC
From India, Thane
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Thane
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
That is the case with government service also. However, the same cannot be applied here in the case of ESI or EPF, which stands for private establishments. If we take the same concept here as well, I think that the conveyance allowance paid will become part of the salary since it is included in the terms of service. In other words, any amount arising out of a settlement will be presumed to be part of the remuneration payable to the person on whom the settlement is binding.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear all, Upon reviewing the two judgments, it was noted that there is a difference between conveyance allowances and traveling allowances. If conveyance is fixed, then it will be a part of the salary. However, if it is claimed, then it should not be considered a part of the salary but should be treated as reimbursement. ESIC should be deducted from fixed allowances, not from reimbursements.
Thanks and regards,
Sumit Kumar Saxena
From India, Ghaziabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thanks and regards,
Sumit Kumar Saxena
From India, Ghaziabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
ESI-Not-applica ble-on-Conveyan ce-Allowance.do c
GOI Proposal for reduction in ESI Contributions.p df