Hi Seniors, Women taking permissible leave during pregnancy were informed that they would be transferred to the contractor's role. The intention is very clear: the manager/management wants to get rid of a woman who is considered to be a liability during pregnancy. Is the management justified in their action? How can a woman defend herself when exposed to such a situation? Please advise.
Regards, JF
From India, Pune
Regards, JF
From India, Pune
Dear HR Fabgear,
Welcome to CiteHR.com! Whether the employee has given notice to the employer under the Maternity Benefits Act 1961; in which case (during the pendency of maternity benefit) any action as cited by you would be illegal and render the employer punishable under the Act.
Warm regards.
From India, Delhi
Welcome to CiteHR.com! Whether the employee has given notice to the employer under the Maternity Benefits Act 1961; in which case (during the pendency of maternity benefit) any action as cited by you would be illegal and render the employer punishable under the Act.
Warm regards.
From India, Delhi
Raj is right. Pregnant women are protected by the Maternity Benefit Act of 1961. During this period, the employer cannot do much but wait it out. If your management considers women a liability, I am truly sorry for such a company. Look for a better set of employers for the sake of your career. Otherwise, you might end up with a similar attitude in the future.
Transferring a woman to a contractor's role also cannot be done, as the company would have to terminate the services of the lady, which is against the law.
Regards,
Viraj
From India, Pune
Transferring a woman to a contractor's role also cannot be done, as the company would have to terminate the services of the lady, which is against the law.
Regards,
Viraj
From India, Pune
Law is very clear. The principal employer has to take the responsibility, even if she transferred on contractor’s roll. I fully concur with Raj and Viraj Govekar
From India, Chandigarh
From India, Chandigarh
Raj Kumar & Viraj are right. I also suggest you give very serious thought to Viraj's advice—look for other companies to work where:
1. Women are treated as an asset rather than a liability.
2. The brains within the company aren't used [or rather misused] to short-circuit the law as well as basic ethical practices just because such a step saves some money—meaning the inherent nature of the management seems to be money is EVERYTHING.
Regards,
TS
From India, Hyderabad
1. Women are treated as an asset rather than a liability.
2. The brains within the company aren't used [or rather misused] to short-circuit the law as well as basic ethical practices just because such a step saves some money—meaning the inherent nature of the management seems to be money is EVERYTHING.
Regards,
TS
From India, Hyderabad
I would like to add a few points:
To transfer the lady from the Principal Employer's Roll to the Contractor's Roll, she needs to be removed from the Rolls of the Principal Employer. For that, either she will be forced to submit a resignation or she will be terminated.
I would suggest the lady not buckle under pressure and not submit her resignation.
To terminate her services, there have to be some grounds or misconduct, which is not the case. Hence, she should stand her ground firmly.
From India, Pune
To transfer the lady from the Principal Employer's Roll to the Contractor's Roll, she needs to be removed from the Rolls of the Principal Employer. For that, either she will be forced to submit a resignation or she will be terminated.
I would suggest the lady not buckle under pressure and not submit her resignation.
To terminate her services, there have to be some grounds or misconduct, which is not the case. Hence, she should stand her ground firmly.
From India, Pune
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.