No Tags Found!


Reported Judgments at a Glance August 2019

Any change in the appointment letter by corrigendum is not permissible. Guj. HC 888.

No automatic absorption of contractor labour is allowed in the prohibition contract labour system. Supreme Court 892.

Dismissal is justified for misappropriation of funds by an employee. Mad. HC 862.

No reinstatement is granted if the workman has lost the confidence of the management. Del. HC 885.

Sit-in protests inside the factory premises, beyond working hours, are considered a criminal offense. Mad. HC 869.

For more reported judgments, please click on the link: https://arghaa.com/news/latest-labou...ugust-2019/689.

Happy Reading

**Location**: Chennai, India

epf judgments, labour judgments, supreme court, appointment letter, working hours, labour law, Country-India, City-India-Chennai,

From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.