No Tags Found!


appointment letter carry hq lucknow but for practically perpose and for dipute mumbai jurisdiction
From India, Sirsa
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

In the appointment letter issued by the headquarters in Lucknow, for all practical purposes and disputes, Mumbai jurisdiction has been indicated by the company without the consent of the employee. This was done solely to provide employment to the employee, but it appears as an attempt to deprive the employee of justice.

Labor Court's Observation on Territorial Jurisdiction

What is the labor court's observation on territorial jurisdiction? Is there a recent case that focuses on the cause of action or the specific point where disputes arise as the only basis for determining jurisdiction? Would a person who has been deprived of their salary have to travel to Mumbai to fight for the salary that is being unlawfully withheld?

Please let me know if you would like further clarification or have any other questions.

From India, Sirsa
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Certain compliance under various labour laws, more particularly ESIC/EPF, can be completed at places other than the posting location. However, concerning the payment of wages, minimum wages, industrial disputes, shops, commercial establishments, etc., the jurisdiction lies at the place of posting.

Regards,
P K Sharma

From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(2)
GV
Amend(0)

CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.