Dear all,
I am working in a company where security personnel are employed both on the company's payroll as well as on a contract basis. The security personnel on the company's payroll are retired defense personnel who have already served the country for 20+ years, so their salaries are much better than the contract security personnel who are only high school graduates and are fresh individuals deployed solely at the gates.
One day, a labor officer conducted an inspection and raised a question regarding the salary disparity issue, citing the Contract Labor Abolition Act of 1970 under Section 12 of supra (1), read with Rule 25 V (A).
Please note that the experience and responsibilities of both categories of security personnel are of a very different nature.
Please advise on what stance we should take on this matter.
VS Chauhan
From India, Gurgaon
I am working in a company where security personnel are employed both on the company's payroll as well as on a contract basis. The security personnel on the company's payroll are retired defense personnel who have already served the country for 20+ years, so their salaries are much better than the contract security personnel who are only high school graduates and are fresh individuals deployed solely at the gates.
One day, a labor officer conducted an inspection and raised a question regarding the salary disparity issue, citing the Contract Labor Abolition Act of 1970 under Section 12 of supra (1), read with Rule 25 V (A).
Please note that the experience and responsibilities of both categories of security personnel are of a very different nature.
Please advise on what stance we should take on this matter.
VS Chauhan
From India, Gurgaon
Gathering data for an AI comment.... Sending emails to relevant members...
Join Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.