No Tags Found!

in a manufacturing unit if an organization have 50 employees are on company roles and rest of the 450 employees are contract workers. is there any legal provision against this.
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)


From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Do you mean any remedy for this or something else to safeguard the interest of the employer?

First of all as per the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act you can not have contract labour on works of perennial or recurring nature which is incidental to the main activities of the company. In your case, I think you are engaging the contract workers in core areas of operations, that it is understandable that you do not require housekeeping, security or other casual workers ten times more than the employees employed for production. That means there is clear violation of legal provisions in this regard. Therefore, therefore, you will not get the protection of law.

If you need remedy for this, you can have, you just take all those who are engaged in routine, perennial or works which require engagement of permanent workers, in to your rolls and start paying their wages directly. This is the only solution. By doing this you become safe both in terms of law as well as financially because by engaging a contractor you must be paying a good amount to him as his service charges in return for no service. You have to take care of the remittances of PF, ESI, payment of wages, Bonus etc and at the same time you do not have any direct control over the workers also. You can not take any disciplinary action against any of them, you can not make them follow the HR or other policies or just Standing Orders of the company. If you put pressure on them, legally, that will prove against you with issues of sham contract etc. Then why should we go for off roll system? If they organize themselves, we should get involved in their negotiation etc and if we have to do that the picture would become very clear that this arrangement is just a windscreen. That was why while delivering the verdict in Bhilwara Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari S. Ltd. Vs. Vinod Kumar Sharma Dead by LRS & Ors. The Supreme Court has said that “…… this new technique of subterfuge has been adopted by some employers in recent years in order to deny the rights of the workmen under various labour statutes by showing that the concerned workmen are not their employees but are the employees/workmen of a contractor, or that they are merely daily wage or short term or casual employees when in fact they are doing the work of regular employees. This Court cannot countenance such practices any more. Globalization/liberalization in the name of growth cannot be at the human cost of exploitation of workers”.

Madhu.T.K

From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Madhu sir,

Thank you very much for your quick reply. In this case, the contractor is a sister concern of the company. To avoid union problems, the contractor came into existence. Can you suggest a remedy in this case?

Regards,
Sowmya

From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Since the contractor has some kind of influence, the entire system seems to be a sham, and the only remedy is to take the employees under your rolls. Yes, there are a lot of companies, very big companies including public sector companies, who work like yours with a major chunk of employees under some other outsourcing agencies' rolls. But I cannot suggest a feasible solution for carrying out business like this. As already pointed out, if you want to do this just to avoid union involvements, you are mistaken; the contract labor can raise an industrial dispute, and in such a scenario, your standing orders will not help you too. Remember what happened in Maruti.

Madhu.T.K

From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

There is one more issue.The contract employees in core functions are more than the regular employees,the contractor/s can stall the functions of the company on a dispute. Varghese Mathew 09961266966
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Please find the GO on Contract labour Appointment. Please go as per the Attached GO
From India, Vijayawada
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf Go on Core Activity-Contract labor.pdf (13.7 KB, 723 views)

Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear sir, in this case contractor is also running by principal employer
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

The answer is very simple. First, the Principal Employer should obtain Form V under CLRA. Thereafter, the Contractor will obtain the CL Licence. If the CL Licence permits the employment of 450 workers, then it is legal. If not, you need to acquire the license to deploy the 450 contract workers.
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Extracting Rule 18 of the CLRA Rules

18. Grant of certificate of Registration.—

(1) The certificate of registration granted under sub-section (2) of sec. 7 shall be in Form II.

(2) Every certificate of registration granted under sub-section (2) of Sec.7 shall contain the following particulars, namely:

(a) the name and address of the establishment;

(b) the maximum number of workmen to be employed as contract labour in the establishment;

(c) the type of business, trade, industry, manufacture or occupation which is carried on in the’ establishment; -

(d) such other particulars as may be releyant to the employment of contract labour in the establishment.

(3) The registering officer shall maintain a register in Form lit showing the particulars of -establishments in relation to which certificates of registration have been issued by him.

(4) if, in relation to an establishment, there is any change, ‘in the particulars specified in the certificate of registration, the principal employer of the establishment shall Intimate to -the registering officer, within thirty day from the date written such change takes place, the particulars of, and the reasons for, such change.

Therefore under Rule 18 (2) (b) the maximum No will be specified.If in the Registration Certificate 450 is permitted then its deployment will be legal.

From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

[QUOTE=vsrlaw;2122416]Extracting Rule 18 of the CLRA Rules

18. Grant of certificate of Registration.—

(1) The certificate of registration granted under sub-section (2) of sec. 7 shall be in Form II.

(2) Every certificate of registration granted under sub-section (2) of Sec.7 shall contain the following particulars, namely:

(a) the name and address of the establishment;

(b) the maximum number of workmen to be employed as contract labour in the establishment;

(c) the type of business, trade, industry, manufacture or occupation which is carried on in the’ establishment; -

(d) such other particulars as may be releyant to the employment of contract labour in the establishment.

(3) The registering officer shall maintain a register in Form lit showing the particulars of -establishments in relation to which certificates of registration have been issued by him.

(4) if, in relation to an establishment, there is any change, ‘in the particulars specified in the certificate of registration, the principal employer of the establishment shall Intimate to -the registering officer, within thirty day from the date written such change takes place, the particulars of, and the reasons for, such change.

Therefore under Rule 18 (2) (b) the maximum No will be specified.If in the Registration Certificate 450 is permitted then its deployment will be legal.[/QUOTE

License at present is 350 workers we are amending it for another 100 then its legal rightt .. doing the same thank you

From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Sowmyarekha.hr@gmail.com,

Our Senior Member/Super Moderator, Madhu ji, has given an answer to your query in very uncertain words, in very simple language. Still, you are not clear on the subject. You need to enhance your knowledge by working under Senior Professionals, reading a lot, and interpreting the provisions of the law in the proper sense. Sorry. I normally avoid such comments.

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Ammisetty Sudhakar,

Thank you very much for sharing this piece of Gazette of the Govt. of AP. In addition to clicking on "Appreciate and Validate" your post, I would like to quote it here so that the members will open the attachment and read it to increase their knowledge hopefully. The core activity defined therein may help us in engaging contract laborers.

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Good information provided by the contributing member by Sudhakar ji
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Sudhakar,

Thank you very much for sharing the Gazette Notification of the Government of Andhra Pradesh. I find the same very informative and useful. The notification has well-defined the "Core Activities" leaving hardly any scope for the engagement of contract labor in the state. It has covered almost all the activities where normally the contract labor is engaged. I wish the Labor Department of the Andhra Pradesh Government implements the notification in its true spirit.

Here, I would like to offer advice to Delhi's AAP Government to follow the steps and amend their Delhi Contract Labor Rules. I am sure that not hundreds, but thousands of contract laborers shall get relief.

BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Madhu Sir,

As you mentioned, we cannot engage contract workers in core activities and work that is perennial in nature. Please explain what is "perennial in nature." Are housekeeping and security roles considered perennial in nature?

Secondly, I would like to inquire whether we can engage contract workers in the HR and Accounts Departments, where we already have some employees on the company's payroll. Please provide clarification.

Regards,
Dinesh Kumar

From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Dinesh Kumar,

You have asked to explain as to what is "Perennial in Nature." I suggest you to go through the Gazette Notification of Govt. of AP,which has been shared and posted by Sudhakar Sir on the ongoing thread.The notification has well defined the"Core Activities" , where the engagement of Contract labour has been prohibited in the state as the employment in those actitivities are considered the employment of perennial in nature It has covered almost all the activities where normally the Contract labour is engaged. The housekeeping and security is also included and have been treated as employment of perennial in nature.

Section 10(2) of the Act also lays down certain guidelines, which required to be kept in mind while deciding the employment of contract labour in any process, operation or other work in any establishment. The Supreme Court of India in the case of Standard Vacuum Refinery Company Vs. their workmen has observed that contract labour should not be employed where: —

(a) The work is perennial and must go on from day to day;

(b) The work is incidental to and necessary for the work of the factory;

(c) The work is sufficient to employ considerable number of whole time workmen; and

(d) The work is being done in most concerns through regular workmen..

A plain dictionary meaning of perennial employment is "lasting throughout the year or through many years". The seasonal employment or employment to clear the pending work or handle the unforeseen work for short duration etc are allowed. With regards to your second query about the engagement of contract worker in HR and Accounts Department in which you have already have some employee on company roll in cocerned, it is clarified that there is no bar for such employment as long you are fulfilling the conditions of the licence mentioned under Central Rule 25(2)(v)(a),which is as under:-



Rule 25(2)(v)(a)- in cases where the workmen employed by the contractor perform the same or similar kind of work as the workmen directly employed by the principal employer of the establishment, the wage rates, holidays, hours of work and other condition of service of the workmen of the contractor shall be the same as applicable to the workmen directly employed by the principal employer of the establishment on the same or similar kind of work:

BS Kalsi

Member since Aug 2011

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.