After one month of joining, my background verification returned negative due to nonperformance. My company has issued a show-cause letter, and now they require a written satisfactory justification. Please help me with what I should do to rectify this situation.
Thank you.
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
Thank you.
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
What justification i give to current employer in case of background verification get negative.pls help i want to give
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear concern, My previous organization have given negative feedback on non performance now my current organization need justification on mail. So pls help
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I worked with that organization for 5 months in the direct channel. There were not enough resources to conduct business, and I did not receive proper support to meet my targets starting from the second month. I communicated with my manager about the need for resources to achieve my goals, but I did not receive appropriate assistance. Please advise on the type of justification I can provide in this situation.
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
It seems your ex-employer criticized your job performance during the background verification. In such a scenario, we have nothing to comment on.
Please provide assurance to your current employer that you will improve your job performance and work to maintain your position.
From India, Aizawl
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
651Please provide assurance to your current employer that you will improve your job performance and work to maintain your position.
From India, Aizawl
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In my understanding, you can submit an explanation or representation highlighting the constraints you faced in your earlier employment. Assure your present employer that the said report cannot be an equitable and judicious benchmark, especially in light of your performance in the present job.
From India, Kochi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Kochi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Dr. Shu,
The problems of this kind arise because HR professionals in general, and top leadership in particular, do not understand the difference between the removal of employees on account of "administrative reasons" and on "disciplinary grounds."
Underperformance is not an evil act as such. Yes, your previous employer had certain expectations for your position, and since you could not meet those expectations, they removed you. Removal from the job is nothing but a punishment. Therefore, explain to your employer that for whatever happened in the previous company, you have already been punished. If the current employer also takes action for what occurred in the previous employment, it would be double punishment and against Indian jurisprudence. Principles of natural justice enshrined in the constitution do not allow more than one punishment, even for a crime.
Address your letter to the MD of the company. However, route it through the HR department.
General Comments: The post reflects the psyche of Indians in general. People always expect everyone to succeed every time, and failure is considered morally bad or wrong. It is believed that those who fail once will fail forever. This is nothing but social bias. The sooner HR professionals get rid of it, the better for society.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(3)
Amend(0)
The problems of this kind arise because HR professionals in general, and top leadership in particular, do not understand the difference between the removal of employees on account of "administrative reasons" and on "disciplinary grounds."
Underperformance is not an evil act as such. Yes, your previous employer had certain expectations for your position, and since you could not meet those expectations, they removed you. Removal from the job is nothing but a punishment. Therefore, explain to your employer that for whatever happened in the previous company, you have already been punished. If the current employer also takes action for what occurred in the previous employment, it would be double punishment and against Indian jurisprudence. Principles of natural justice enshrined in the constitution do not allow more than one punishment, even for a crime.
Address your letter to the MD of the company. However, route it through the HR department.
General Comments: The post reflects the psyche of Indians in general. People always expect everyone to succeed every time, and failure is considered morally bad or wrong. It is believed that those who fail once will fail forever. This is nothing but social bias. The sooner HR professionals get rid of it, the better for society.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(3)Amend(0)
First, your existing company does not have professional ethics; they should complete all these formalities before releasing an offer. Now, you give justification that the company has given wrong feedback, and they can assess your performance during probation.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Background Verification.do c
Benefiting From Negative Feedback.pdf