Dear Members of Training Fraternity, Has anyone used the 70:20:10 rule of Training and what are your observations. Thanks in advance. Ajay Kalyan
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
2From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Ajay, since I have been involved in training for the last 17 years, your post obviously caught my attention. However, you could have provided a little more elaboration on the nature of your query. Are you a student or a working professional? If the latter, are you a training manager or an external trainer? What is the context of your query?
After browsing Google, I came across a few articles. The basic premise of the model is as follows:
- 70% of learning is experiential. It occurs through daily tasks, challenges, and practice.
- 20% of learning is social. It happens with and through other people, such as coworkers.
- 10% of learning is formal. It occurs through structured training courses and programs.
On Wikipedia, there is an article on this subject, which also includes criticisms. You can refer to the article by clicking the following link: [link to the article]
My observation: The model does not address self-learning and self-motivation. For a well-motivated employee or worker, the percentage breakdown could be different. Having conducted hundreds of training programs, I have noticed that participants often attend out of discipline rather than willingness. With an unwilling mindset, whether it is experiential, social, or formal learning, it may not make a significant difference. For further queries, feel free to contact me.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
After browsing Google, I came across a few articles. The basic premise of the model is as follows:
- 70% of learning is experiential. It occurs through daily tasks, challenges, and practice.
- 20% of learning is social. It happens with and through other people, such as coworkers.
- 10% of learning is formal. It occurs through structured training courses and programs.
On Wikipedia, there is an article on this subject, which also includes criticisms. You can refer to the article by clicking the following link: [link to the article]
My observation: The model does not address self-learning and self-motivation. For a well-motivated employee or worker, the percentage breakdown could be different. Having conducted hundreds of training programs, I have noticed that participants often attend out of discipline rather than willingness. With an unwilling mindset, whether it is experiential, social, or formal learning, it may not make a significant difference. For further queries, feel free to contact me.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
The 10 20 30 rule of PowerPoint.doc
Special Issues in Training and Development - PPT 10.ppt
New ABP return for PF 20.1.10.pdf