I am working with a logistics company. The leave structure here is 7 CL, 8 SL, and 15 PL. Only PLs are carried forward, while CL and SL are not encashed and lapse at the end of the year. Now, the management wants employees to take CL, SL, and PL on a pro-rata basis only. For example, CL can be taken only once every two months. They also want to incorporate a salary deduction if an employee takes more than that in a particular month.
Industry Practice Inquiry
Is this an acceptable and practiced trend in the industry? Most employees usually are well within their leaves at the end of the year, so is this a fair policy?
Kindly advise.
From India, Mumbai
Industry Practice Inquiry
Is this an acceptable and practiced trend in the industry? Most employees usually are well within their leaves at the end of the year, so is this a fair policy?
Kindly advise.
From India, Mumbai
Yes, as per the eligibility, only you have to avail. Generally, some employees will avail a greater number of leaves and leave the company without any intimation or information.
Compliance with Leave Rules
If you are allowed to avail your eligible leaves, then you have to comply with the leave rules of the company. In emergencies, the company should also allow employees to use the leaves; for example, if an employee is sick, then they have to allow it. This depends on the relationship. I believe that earlier they might have allowed it, but they might have found some foul play, hence they want to be stricter.
Regards,
Kamesh
From India, Hyderabad
Compliance with Leave Rules
If you are allowed to avail your eligible leaves, then you have to comply with the leave rules of the company. In emergencies, the company should also allow employees to use the leaves; for example, if an employee is sick, then they have to allow it. This depends on the relationship. I believe that earlier they might have allowed it, but they might have found some foul play, hence they want to be stricter.
Regards,
Kamesh
From India, Hyderabad
Management can do this, but for that, they have to change their HR policy too. In our company, we have 7 Casual Leaves. We have made policies like:
i. Casual leaves will not be allowed to be combined with Earned Leave or Sick Leave.
ii. An employee joining the company in the midst of the calendar year will be allowed casual leave on a pro-rata basis.
iii. An employee can avail up to two days of casual leave in a quarter, subject to a maximum of seven days in a year. However, the unavailed leave of the previous quarters can be combined and availed in the succeeding quarter, but at a time not more than three days of casual leave can be availed.
So, you can also define it like this.
iv. For availing a casual leave, an employee must ensure that his application reaches his controlling officer at least one day in advance, and his consent is obtained.
Thank you.
Regards
From India, Durgapur
i. Casual leaves will not be allowed to be combined with Earned Leave or Sick Leave.
ii. An employee joining the company in the midst of the calendar year will be allowed casual leave on a pro-rata basis.
iii. An employee can avail up to two days of casual leave in a quarter, subject to a maximum of seven days in a year. However, the unavailed leave of the previous quarters can be combined and availed in the succeeding quarter, but at a time not more than three days of casual leave can be availed.
So, you can also define it like this.
iv. For availing a casual leave, an employee must ensure that his application reaches his controlling officer at least one day in advance, and his consent is obtained.
Thank you.
Regards
From India, Durgapur
I do not know about your company, but in most companies, leaves are credited only after the completion of 6 months or a year. This means employees receive leave based on their work in the previous year. Therefore, asking them to take pro-rata leave makes no sense. It should be the employee's choice when to use their leave. If you allow employees to take leave during the first year, then pro-rata makes sense.
Regards.
From India, Mumbai
Regards.
From India, Mumbai
I agree with Ratikanta Rath’s Model. How any orgaisation should formulate his own policy according to nature of employment they are providing. Regards. -SURENDRA JAIN
From India, Jodhpur
From India, Jodhpur
Hai dear friends, I would like to know whether the CL should be 12 days in a year as per law?
From India, Bangalore
From India, Bangalore
Dear Usha, As per statutory there is number of days not defined for CL .Company give CL as per their HR Policy but for EL minimum 15 days defined. Ratikanta Rath
From India, Durgapur
From India, Durgapur
Understanding Statutory Leave Requirements
EL is the only leave which you have to pay to your employees statutorily. To avail of EL leave, employees have to work a minimum of 240 days in a year.
Company Leave Policies: CL and SL
CL and SL leave depend upon company leave policies. Even though you may not have any CL and SL in your HR policy, it is not going to create any problems since it is not mandatory statutorily record-wise. However, you have to give them a minimum of 15 days of EL (Earned Leave), which they can avail of in the next succeeding year.
Regards,
Ratikanta Rath
From India, Durgapur
EL is the only leave which you have to pay to your employees statutorily. To avail of EL leave, employees have to work a minimum of 240 days in a year.
Company Leave Policies: CL and SL
CL and SL leave depend upon company leave policies. Even though you may not have any CL and SL in your HR policy, it is not going to create any problems since it is not mandatory statutorily record-wise. However, you have to give them a minimum of 15 days of EL (Earned Leave), which they can avail of in the next succeeding year.
Regards,
Ratikanta Rath
From India, Durgapur
Hi Saswata, CL,SL and pro rata PL is given on completion of 6 months (until the approaching Jan). However, fresh leaves are credited in Jan.
From India, Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Understanding Leave Sanctioning Authority
We have a wrong notion that we could sanction leave beyond what is mentioned in the standing orders or appointment letter. In my opinion, we don't have the power or authority to sanction leave beyond the eligible leave for an employee, such as Casual Leave (CL), earned leave as per the Factories Act or Shop Act, and sick leave. If an employee's absence is permitted, they could be marked as on authorized absence (AA), and in the case of absence without permission, they have to be marked as on unauthorized absence (UA). In the case of absence on medical grounds with an ESI certificate, they may be marked as on medical grounds (AM).
From India, Bangalore
We have a wrong notion that we could sanction leave beyond what is mentioned in the standing orders or appointment letter. In my opinion, we don't have the power or authority to sanction leave beyond the eligible leave for an employee, such as Casual Leave (CL), earned leave as per the Factories Act or Shop Act, and sick leave. If an employee's absence is permitted, they could be marked as on authorized absence (AA), and in the case of absence without permission, they have to be marked as on unauthorized absence (UA). In the case of absence on medical grounds with an ESI certificate, they may be marked as on medical grounds (AM).
From India, Bangalore
The Factory Act and Shop & Establishment Act provide for leave after working for 240 days, meaning that employees will be eligible for leave after one year of working. However, in this company, leaves are allowed after 6 months. It is important to note that nothing in the law prohibits the employer from granting more leave than what is mandated by the law.
From India, Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.