Dear All, What are the questions should hr ask to judge the candidates attitude & stability during interview. Thanks & Regards Pooja
From India, Delhi
From India, Delhi
For approximate good results you can have online psychometric test. These results will be closely accurate.
From India, Pune
From India, Pune
Dear Pooja,
Assessing Candidate Stability During Interviews
Judging a candidate's stability is one of the most unpredictable attributes during an interview. However, with experience, I would like to share my way of assessing candidates on this.
Always look for "what motivates the candidate in changing jobs in a career?"
For instance:
- Dec 2004 - Feb 2006: XYZ Ltd
- Mar 2006 - April 2008: PQR Ltd
- May 2008 - till Date: OMR Ltd.
We always show our interest in this sequence: why did you leave OMR, and now why are you leaving XYZ? This actually breaks the prepared answer of any potential candidate as they cannot give the same excuse twice. Based on their answer, we look for their interest in the following: Money Driven, Designation Driven, Location Constraint, or what.
Match these with your requirements, and take a gut feeling decision on the person's commitment to stay.
Also, do inquire thoroughly about the person's family background. It often gives a clear indication of what might pull them to withdraw from the job, or how important the next promotion or current salary is for them.
If you are hiring outstation candidates, do inquire about the frequency of visits to their hometown and also the dependents at home. Be extra careful with females or the elder child of the family.
Sometimes we make the person calculate their career growth. This has given us great results in terms of stability. We make them calculate with us, their growth meter in terms of successive months ahead.
This acts as an eye-opener to them, and they tend to be more professional.
Hope you can get in the rhythm of the above said.
Regards,
Ankita Puri
From India, New Delhi
Assessing Candidate Stability During Interviews
Judging a candidate's stability is one of the most unpredictable attributes during an interview. However, with experience, I would like to share my way of assessing candidates on this.
Always look for "what motivates the candidate in changing jobs in a career?"
For instance:
- Dec 2004 - Feb 2006: XYZ Ltd
- Mar 2006 - April 2008: PQR Ltd
- May 2008 - till Date: OMR Ltd.
We always show our interest in this sequence: why did you leave OMR, and now why are you leaving XYZ? This actually breaks the prepared answer of any potential candidate as they cannot give the same excuse twice. Based on their answer, we look for their interest in the following: Money Driven, Designation Driven, Location Constraint, or what.
Match these with your requirements, and take a gut feeling decision on the person's commitment to stay.
Also, do inquire thoroughly about the person's family background. It often gives a clear indication of what might pull them to withdraw from the job, or how important the next promotion or current salary is for them.
If you are hiring outstation candidates, do inquire about the frequency of visits to their hometown and also the dependents at home. Be extra careful with females or the elder child of the family.
Sometimes we make the person calculate their career growth. This has given us great results in terms of stability. We make them calculate with us, their growth meter in terms of successive months ahead.
This acts as an eye-opener to them, and they tend to be more professional.
Hope you can get in the rhythm of the above said.
Regards,
Ankita Puri
From India, New Delhi
Dear Pooja Always make stress interview as part of the interview so that you will get an idea of true personality of the candidate. Regards Akshay Hindustan Motors
From India, Madras
From India, Madras
Why Explore So Deep
1) Look for the skills match.
2) Decide what the candidate will stay here and do rather than asking him/her if selected, "How long will you stay?"
3) Most HRs fail to realize, "We will provide you a conducive environment to stay on." That should be the way to look at it. Rather than assessing the stability of the candidate, the stability of the organization is more important. Many HRs fail to realize this. This is my experience from the interviews.
The folly in the mentioned process: "What if the candidate holds project portfolios always, and he has no home to go?" He has to change tracks. Please look at it from this angle.
Regards,
Milind Mulgund
From India, Mumbai
1) Look for the skills match.
2) Decide what the candidate will stay here and do rather than asking him/her if selected, "How long will you stay?"
3) Most HRs fail to realize, "We will provide you a conducive environment to stay on." That should be the way to look at it. Rather than assessing the stability of the candidate, the stability of the organization is more important. Many HRs fail to realize this. This is my experience from the interviews.
The folly in the mentioned process: "What if the candidate holds project portfolios always, and he has no home to go?" He has to change tracks. Please look at it from this angle.
Regards,
Milind Mulgund
From India, Mumbai
Parameters to Judge a Candidate
According to me, we can judge a candidate based on these parameters:
1. Positive attitude/behavior
2. Adaptability
3. Willingness to work in teams
4. Learning to learn from mistakes
5. Proactive
6. Handling stress and criticism
7. Energy, enthusiasm, and interest to work in that particular field
With Regards,
Phanindra
From India, Hyderabad
According to me, we can judge a candidate based on these parameters:
1. Positive attitude/behavior
2. Adaptability
3. Willingness to work in teams
4. Learning to learn from mistakes
5. Proactive
6. Handling stress and criticism
7. Energy, enthusiasm, and interest to work in that particular field
With Regards,
Phanindra
From India, Hyderabad
Candidate Evaluation Techniques
I feel the following elements need to be identified. The points mentioned are non-traditional, and I believe they will help you judge the candidates more thoroughly on a vertical level:
A. Discuss a domain-level case study with them. The purpose of this discussion is to encourage a broader thinking process and to evaluate their solutions.
B. Present them with decision-based puzzles or quizzes, etc. The purpose is to assess their problem-solving abilities.
Pooja, you can also include some "honey trap" questions to evaluate their stability.
Regards,
Simmy Saini | Google India.
From India, Mumbai
I feel the following elements need to be identified. The points mentioned are non-traditional, and I believe they will help you judge the candidates more thoroughly on a vertical level:
A. Discuss a domain-level case study with them. The purpose of this discussion is to encourage a broader thinking process and to evaluate their solutions.
B. Present them with decision-based puzzles or quizzes, etc. The purpose is to assess their problem-solving abilities.
Pooja, you can also include some "honey trap" questions to evaluate their stability.
Regards,
Simmy Saini | Google India.
From India, Mumbai
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.