Dear Friends, Kindly highlight the strategies adopted by your managements on the issue of non-usage of personal protective equipment by employees pl. Regards, Kesava Pillai
From India, Kollam
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
256From India, Kollam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Sir,
Good topic again...
The following are the major initiatives taken by our management:
1. Implementing the concept of "Safety is Line Management Responsibility".
2. Safety Audit (Contract Field Safety Audit with severity rating) by Line Engineers & Managers.
3. Safety Observation by Top Management Executives emphasizing on Behavioral Changes.
4. Ensuring the availability of quality PPE to all the workers according to the job requirement.
5. Morning TBT in each section covering all the employees, conducted by the immediate site supervisor or engineer.
6. Penalty Close on contractors for safety non-compliance.
7. Etc.
With regards,
Dipil Kumar V
From India
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Good topic again...
The following are the major initiatives taken by our management:
1. Implementing the concept of "Safety is Line Management Responsibility".
2. Safety Audit (Contract Field Safety Audit with severity rating) by Line Engineers & Managers.
3. Safety Observation by Top Management Executives emphasizing on Behavioral Changes.
4. Ensuring the availability of quality PPE to all the workers according to the job requirement.
5. Morning TBT in each section covering all the employees, conducted by the immediate site supervisor or engineer.
6. Penalty Close on contractors for safety non-compliance.
7. Etc.
With regards,
Dipil Kumar V
From India
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Friends,
The importance of a study on managerial strategies for not using PPE will show that most managements are not serious about safety. Most CEOs will find time only to inaugurate a few functions like safety training for senior staff, celebration of Safety Day, etc. They will not be able to find time for safety unless it is a case of fatality. Responsibility for safety is entirely left with safety officers. In some companies, safety officers are even found doing other jobs that have absolutely no connection with safety. The appointment of a safety officer is a statutory requirement, and hence they are there.
Think about how many cases of disciplinary actions are initiated in your company for non-usage of PPE?
Disciplinary action has to be initiated not for non-usage of PPE as such. Not using PPE provided for the safety of the employee is a serious misconduct, and as such, disciplinary action is to be initiated for misconduct. Even the union will not be able to stand in the way as it is a safety issue.
Safety Officers have to be serious and convince HRM and executives to realize the importance of safety and change the present strategies to achieve results.
Regards,
Kesava Pillai
From India, Kollam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The importance of a study on managerial strategies for not using PPE will show that most managements are not serious about safety. Most CEOs will find time only to inaugurate a few functions like safety training for senior staff, celebration of Safety Day, etc. They will not be able to find time for safety unless it is a case of fatality. Responsibility for safety is entirely left with safety officers. In some companies, safety officers are even found doing other jobs that have absolutely no connection with safety. The appointment of a safety officer is a statutory requirement, and hence they are there.
Think about how many cases of disciplinary actions are initiated in your company for non-usage of PPE?
Disciplinary action has to be initiated not for non-usage of PPE as such. Not using PPE provided for the safety of the employee is a serious misconduct, and as such, disciplinary action is to be initiated for misconduct. Even the union will not be able to stand in the way as it is a safety issue.
Safety Officers have to be serious and convince HRM and executives to realize the importance of safety and change the present strategies to achieve results.
Regards,
Kesava Pillai
From India, Kollam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Sir,
Thank you for the nice reply. Nobody else seems interested in taking part in these discussions. I hope for more participation. I have informed a few of my friends about this citehr, and they will be joining us soon.
Could you please review my last post and share your thoughts on whether all these initiatives are helpful for bringing about a sustainable change in the SMS?
With regards,
Dipil Kumar V
From India
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thank you for the nice reply. Nobody else seems interested in taking part in these discussions. I hope for more participation. I have informed a few of my friends about this citehr, and they will be joining us soon.
Could you please review my last post and share your thoughts on whether all these initiatives are helpful for bringing about a sustainable change in the SMS?
With regards,
Dipil Kumar V
From India
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hello Dipil,
I include the safety obligations that employees must comply with within their contracts of employment and simply instruct all staff to comply with this lawful instruction. I developed the company's safety policy that the CEO signed, which includes a statement concerning adhering to safety guidelines. Furthermore, under the Federal Australian Safety Act, employees must follow the employer's instructions, which places an obligation upon staff to wear PPE; otherwise, they can be prosecuted. I also include wearing PPE within the staff code of conduct. Lastly, I encourage staff to proactively manage their safety by recognizing and rewarding them for actively supporting the policy.
Considering these issues, I have never experienced a problem with any of my staff (over 400).
Good luck!
From Netherlands
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I include the safety obligations that employees must comply with within their contracts of employment and simply instruct all staff to comply with this lawful instruction. I developed the company's safety policy that the CEO signed, which includes a statement concerning adhering to safety guidelines. Furthermore, under the Federal Australian Safety Act, employees must follow the employer's instructions, which places an obligation upon staff to wear PPE; otherwise, they can be prosecuted. I also include wearing PPE within the staff code of conduct. Lastly, I encourage staff to proactively manage their safety by recognizing and rewarding them for actively supporting the policy.
Considering these issues, I have never experienced a problem with any of my staff (over 400).
Good luck!
From Netherlands
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Ronald Mackenzie,
Management systems differ from industry to industry. Of late, modern managements have started considering safety as a good business practice. They pay more attention and heed all the advice from the safety department and implement suitable strategies. However, few are still to realize the importance of safety. Their safety standard is low. The safety department is ineffective. Safety officers struggle with every issue. The safety staff has no voice. Slowly, the safety staff becomes ineffective. In most cases, safety staff are finding it difficult to fulfill their duty hours. No one is accountable.
Again, it is the caliber of the safety staff. A good safety man visualizes even strategies to convince top managements. He seriously implements safety measures. For him, it is easy, and his directives are strictly adhered to. He will have no grievances. He achieves results. And he will always be busy. He loves his profession.
I emphasize that the failure of safety management is due to the weakness of the safety staff. Their inability to convince management. Instead of advising the management on safety matters as an expert, they just do what management tells them to do - perhaps for survival, I presume. This approach has to change.
Instead of expressing helplessness, let safety officers be strong with expertise. They will succeed.
Regards,
Kesava Pillai
From India, Kollam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Management systems differ from industry to industry. Of late, modern managements have started considering safety as a good business practice. They pay more attention and heed all the advice from the safety department and implement suitable strategies. However, few are still to realize the importance of safety. Their safety standard is low. The safety department is ineffective. Safety officers struggle with every issue. The safety staff has no voice. Slowly, the safety staff becomes ineffective. In most cases, safety staff are finding it difficult to fulfill their duty hours. No one is accountable.
Again, it is the caliber of the safety staff. A good safety man visualizes even strategies to convince top managements. He seriously implements safety measures. For him, it is easy, and his directives are strictly adhered to. He will have no grievances. He achieves results. And he will always be busy. He loves his profession.
I emphasize that the failure of safety management is due to the weakness of the safety staff. Their inability to convince management. Instead of advising the management on safety matters as an expert, they just do what management tells them to do - perhaps for survival, I presume. This approach has to change.
Instead of expressing helplessness, let safety officers be strong with expertise. They will succeed.
Regards,
Kesava Pillai
From India, Kollam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
This is a very good topic. I strongly agree with Mr. Kesava Pillai. Since I am a safety professional, I can understand the real-time difficulties of implementing safety. Most companies think that the usage of PPE alone ensures safety. However, that is not the case. When an organization truly wants to implement safety, it has to be integrated with their processes (process-oriented safety). Otherwise, the safety officer's role is often seen as just "finding it difficult to kill their duty hours."
Many industries do not involve safety professionals in their process activities or changes. If something goes wrong, the blame usually falls on the safety officer for their perceived inefficiency. This highlights the need for a "mind change of the management" to include safety as a fundamental part of their processes.
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Many industries do not involve safety professionals in their process activities or changes. If something goes wrong, the blame usually falls on the safety officer for their perceived inefficiency. This highlights the need for a "mind change of the management" to include safety as a fundamental part of their processes.
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Keshav Pillai,
I disagree with your point that "I emphasize that the failure of safety management is due to the weakness of the safety staff, their inability to convince management."
Please let me know how many Indian companies appoint Qualified Safety Officers. In my experience, most Indian companies appoint a Safety Officer merely for statutory requirements. However, if they are experts with the necessary skills to persuade management, who will listen to their words? To whom are they supposed to convince to bring about changes/improvements in the safety management system?
Unless management is committed to safety, nothing will change. Even with an Expert Safety Professional in the management team, or else the statutory requirements must change. They should be stringent enough to prevent companies from neglecting safety, which will inevitably lead to change.
Ronald, your post is very insightful. Thank you for sharing the initiatives taken by your management towards safety.
Best regards,
Dipil Kumar V
From India
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I disagree with your point that "I emphasize that the failure of safety management is due to the weakness of the safety staff, their inability to convince management."
Please let me know how many Indian companies appoint Qualified Safety Officers. In my experience, most Indian companies appoint a Safety Officer merely for statutory requirements. However, if they are experts with the necessary skills to persuade management, who will listen to their words? To whom are they supposed to convince to bring about changes/improvements in the safety management system?
Unless management is committed to safety, nothing will change. Even with an Expert Safety Professional in the management team, or else the statutory requirements must change. They should be stringent enough to prevent companies from neglecting safety, which will inevitably lead to change.
Ronald, your post is very insightful. Thank you for sharing the initiatives taken by your management towards safety.
Best regards,
Dipil Kumar V
From India
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Friends,
Sandwiched tightly between Top Brass and the teeming masses sits a wild-eyed individual madly singing a safety tune. He's the most misunderstood, maligned, and unsung person in all the world of business. He's the proverbial "SAFETY PROFESSIONAL".
Regards,
Kesava Pillai
From India, Kollam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Sandwiched tightly between Top Brass and the teeming masses sits a wild-eyed individual madly singing a safety tune. He's the most misunderstood, maligned, and unsung person in all the world of business. He's the proverbial "SAFETY PROFESSIONAL".
Regards,
Kesava Pillai
From India, Kollam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Can you make it clear... Waht you wish to convey in simple language? With regards, Dipil Kumar V
From India
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear All,
Thanks for highlighting this issue. Safety is followed well in the MNC's and not in Indian Companies. I have worked in many companies [Indian as well as MNC's/Small and Large]. The things I have learned are that:
- Safety always percolates from TOP to Bottom.
- Safety should be everybody's responsibility.
- The top management should be committed to safety. If the TOP BOSS has commitment towards Safety/EHS, everything goes well. It's not that Safety Professionals are unable to convince the management. The top management people are not spoon-feeding children. They know everything. Safety is much a matter of common sense.
- I agree that Safety Professionals must be passionate. They must have proper knowledge of all PPE's available in the Market. They should select PPE's which are user-friendly. It should provide comfort to workers. The sizes are very important. Everything is available in the market for every hazard. [But cost matters, again the commitment from management].
- All the supervisors and staff members should become the role models in front of employees. If they don't use PPEs, how will workers use them? Many times, management people roam on the shop floor without PPE's.
- Safety committees should have participation from workers. In that way, various issues will be solved, but only when the EHS Committed TOP BOSS is chairman.
- Leadership safety tours should be arranged by staff members [Not only by EHS specialists]. They should go on the shop floor, with safety as the only focus. They should identify safe/unsafe behaviors. Appreciate the workers for the good things they are doing. Convince the workers to use PPEs as if they are their younger brothers. This type of caring approach helps a lot.
- Involve the workers in various activities like auditing, safety tours, making them responsible for EHS topics, etc.
- There are many things to share, but time is constrained.
Can call me on 9223456783 if you want to discuss. [In the evening]
Regards,
Sachin Thorat.
From India, Voreppe
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thanks for highlighting this issue. Safety is followed well in the MNC's and not in Indian Companies. I have worked in many companies [Indian as well as MNC's/Small and Large]. The things I have learned are that:
- Safety always percolates from TOP to Bottom.
- Safety should be everybody's responsibility.
- The top management should be committed to safety. If the TOP BOSS has commitment towards Safety/EHS, everything goes well. It's not that Safety Professionals are unable to convince the management. The top management people are not spoon-feeding children. They know everything. Safety is much a matter of common sense.
- I agree that Safety Professionals must be passionate. They must have proper knowledge of all PPE's available in the Market. They should select PPE's which are user-friendly. It should provide comfort to workers. The sizes are very important. Everything is available in the market for every hazard. [But cost matters, again the commitment from management].
- All the supervisors and staff members should become the role models in front of employees. If they don't use PPEs, how will workers use them? Many times, management people roam on the shop floor without PPE's.
- Safety committees should have participation from workers. In that way, various issues will be solved, but only when the EHS Committed TOP BOSS is chairman.
- Leadership safety tours should be arranged by staff members [Not only by EHS specialists]. They should go on the shop floor, with safety as the only focus. They should identify safe/unsafe behaviors. Appreciate the workers for the good things they are doing. Convince the workers to use PPEs as if they are their younger brothers. This type of caring approach helps a lot.
- Involve the workers in various activities like auditing, safety tours, making them responsible for EHS topics, etc.
- There are many things to share, but time is constrained.
Can call me on 9223456783 if you want to discuss. [In the evening]
Regards,
Sachin Thorat.
From India, Voreppe
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
ERM Contractor Safety Management Final.pdf
16 Vangonotes HRM - Employee Safety and Health.zip