Dear Zina A,
Thank you for raising a proper HR query. Most of the queries on this forum concern notice periods, PF/ESI, etc., which are not considered true HR queries.
I have reviewed the Excel sheet you provided and noted the following observations:
a) You have included the date of exit (not termination) and the date of joining for 135 employees. However, this data is consolidated for the entire organization without a breakdown by department, hindering department-wise analysis.
b) To facilitate analysis, I have converted the Excel sheet into a Google Sheet. You can view it by clicking [here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ldiJG5W9Y3lVhmvm6pjRQuHi1LGuVQAt3-V_1faSd1g/edit?usp=sharing).
The following insights are derived from the Google Sheet:
c) The highest employee attrition rate (19%) occurs within the _____ year slab.
d) Attrition rates for the three duration slabs - ____ years, ____ years, and ____ years - stand at 50%.
Corrective actions for (c) and (d): Commence conducting stay interviews as employees reach _____ years of tenure. Develop career plans to demonstrate growth opportunities within the company.
e) Employee attrition within the _________ slab is 12%, potentially due to employees' inability to align with the work environment or tasks.
Corrective action for (e): Enhance recruitment practices.
f) ____% of employee attritions belong to the >10 years slab, possibly because employees remain until retirement. If long-serving employees do not contribute value, consider hiring replacements at a lower salary to mitigate their departure.
I trust you find the analysis satisfactory.
Forecasting Explanation
Your query pertains to forecasting attrition, yet the provided data is insufficient for any forecast. Given an average employee tenure of 1,618 days and a Standard Deviation (SD) of 1,468 days, forecasting based on these figures is challenging.
Senior members are encouraged to review the Google sheet and offer their insights.
Thank you,
Dinesh Divekar