Dear Mr. Bhaskar,
At least I do not get convinced with the views of a Super Moderator, like you. I wonder to know if there is any base of your presumption that Mr. Pragnesh is "not at all seeing the reply posted on the thread."
I wonder to know further, what did you you mean to convey, whether to take the contents of the query as negative in nature or Mr. Pragnesh, as a negative person, by your statement, "normally I used to tell to my colleagues to be away from negative people. They are smart enough to make others negative and they will move ahead on their own way. It is we to decide to be in which part. If we mix sugar and sand together, the ants will take the sugar and leave the Sand. Like that we must take the materials which is good and beneficial to the mankind and leave the harmful and negative substances available in the social media."
Irrespective of the fact that the account of Mr. Pragnesh remained dormant for about 3 years, but his query was not dormant or so old. He posted the query only in September 2015.
The query reads as, "Coaching is always personal and one to one. However coaching driven within organisations should meet both individual and organisational goals. Would like to get views about how the coaching engagement is conducted and views on should organisation needs be included in such engagements."
To me, the query is quite thought provoking and the views of the readers can make the members quite enlightened. So, as many as views of the members are posted that can definitely enhance the knowledge and capabilities of the members. So, at least on that count, your views cannot be understandable about negativity of the query or the material to be harmful and negative substance to be left untouched. That way, only your views can be considered as negative tending to discourage the members to post their views any further on the query.
If you wanted to convey that the author, Mr. Pragnesh was negative minded, I am unable to digest that also. I don't think that the author should start commenting frequently on the views of the members to make the thread quite unweildy. There is nothing wrong if a person keeps watching the views of the members on his query to enable him to form his own conclusive opinion or to get his concept clearer. We should not forget that the query is merely two months' old and not many members have contributed on that to arrive at some definite or conclusive opinion by anyone, what to say of the author.
So, such like views, as in the concluding part of your contribution, can only tend to discourage the members to post any further thought provoking views and tend further to prove as a negative approach on their part, which can prove your own thinking, like, "They are smart enough to make others negative and they will move ahead on their own way."
PLEASE DON'T MIND ABOUT MY FRANK OPINION ON YOUR POST, RATHER, IT WOULD BE BETTER, IF YOU MAKE A REVIEW OF YOUR OWN CONTRIBUTION TO HELP THE MEMBERS TO PROVIDE MORE AND MORE THOUGHT PROVOKING CONTRIBUTION ON THE QUERY OF MR. PRAGNESH, OTHERWISE, EXCEPT DISCUSSION ON YOUR OWN CONTRIBUTION THE MAIN ISSUE OF THE ORIGINAL QUERY.WOULD BE LOST IN THE OBLIVION.