Group-ism in Offices
Most of us will accept that group-ism is prevalent in most offices—friends, relatives, same caste, forward vs. backward, men and/or women, rich and/or poor, same location/school/college/state/region/language/department, similar hobbies/likes & dislikes, level/grade/rank & file, etc.
On top of that, reservation policies and Visakha guidelines add fuel to the fire, leading to a vertical split.
Adherence is a must; but practically, the 'special beneficiaries anywhere,' like Bharat in Ramayan, are not seen with a balanced mindset. Recruitment, appraisal, promotion, posting/deputation, transport, foreign travel, training & seminar participation, maternity, night shift, facilities, office job vs. outgoing; everywhere you will find the tool of prize & punishment.
Where is the equal battlefield? Who will think of the sufferers? How difficult is it for decision-makers to analyze both rational and nonsensical factors and get away with it? Who knows what 'emotional bonding' means in this scenario?
Most of us will accept that group-ism is prevalent in most offices—friends, relatives, same caste, forward vs. backward, men and/or women, rich and/or poor, same location/school/college/state/region/language/department, similar hobbies/likes & dislikes, level/grade/rank & file, etc.
On top of that, reservation policies and Visakha guidelines add fuel to the fire, leading to a vertical split.
Adherence is a must; but practically, the 'special beneficiaries anywhere,' like Bharat in Ramayan, are not seen with a balanced mindset. Recruitment, appraisal, promotion, posting/deputation, transport, foreign travel, training & seminar participation, maternity, night shift, facilities, office job vs. outgoing; everywhere you will find the tool of prize & punishment.
Where is the equal battlefield? Who will think of the sufferers? How difficult is it for decision-makers to analyze both rational and nonsensical factors and get away with it? Who knows what 'emotional bonding' means in this scenario?