I heard there is a trend of rating 125% as commendable equivalent alpha rating and a similar way 150% for outstanding.
My questions are:
1. Is this the trend now?
2. It seems mathematically incorrect.
Thank you in advance for your comments.
From India, Tikri
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
My questions are:
1. Is this the trend now?
2. It seems mathematically incorrect.
Thank you in advance for your comments.
From India, Tikri
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Siva, Every company has its own way of working. The basic idea is to design various performance slabs. Quantification of performance slabs can be seen in the following ranges: - Above 85% - 75-85% - 65-75% These slabs are better than subjective rating slabs like "Excellent", "Very Good", "Good", etc. The latter leaves more room for manipulation than the former. Regarding adding extra weight to the higher slabs, I do not believe it will bring any significant change. The essence of a Performance Management System (PMS) lies in giving primacy to the organization's performance, identifying costs or ratios associated with the business, and assigning them to the respective Heads of Departments (HODs). HR or the company's leadership may pull a rabbit out of their hat, but at the same time, they must ensure that the principles of the PMS are not diluted in any way. Thanks, Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
8087From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Sample Performance Appraisal rating form.doc