Hi Members,
I manage the HR requirements for a small but global IT company that facilitates other IT giants in marketing their products - Channel marketing. Our Account Managers and Program Managers need to stay in constant contact with their clients, customers, and colleagues. Most of them have permission to work or provide support from home. As we work across different time zones, they sometimes need to attend meetings from home.
A couple of them are abusing this privilege by applying to work from home whenever they face a personal challenge. They are allowed to do so because their reporting Head is located in the states where most employees work from home by design and save on commuting time.
Can anyone help me by suggesting a proper work from home policy that can curtail such abuses?
Thank you in Advance,
Ashok
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
1I manage the HR requirements for a small but global IT company that facilitates other IT giants in marketing their products - Channel marketing. Our Account Managers and Program Managers need to stay in constant contact with their clients, customers, and colleagues. Most of them have permission to work or provide support from home. As we work across different time zones, they sometimes need to attend meetings from home.
A couple of them are abusing this privilege by applying to work from home whenever they face a personal challenge. They are allowed to do so because their reporting Head is located in the states where most employees work from home by design and save on commuting time.
Can anyone help me by suggesting a proper work from home policy that can curtail such abuses?
Thank you in Advance,
Ashok
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Ashok,
You have written, "A couple of them are abusing this privilege by applying to work from home whenever they have some personal challenge."
We need clarification here. What do you mean by "abusing"?
"Work from home" is a facility provided to employees whose targets are well defined. The amount of work they need to complete in a specific time frame is determined. Certain tasks do not require personal interaction with other departments. Many things can be managed through telephone, email, etc., and this work from home facility is only given to those employees. So, where does the issue of "abusing the facility" arise?
Organizations are implementing "work from home" to save on electricity, water consumption, and more. Some organizations even encourage employees to work from home exclusively, as stated in their appointment letters.
Every situation has its downside. For instance, a female employee working from home may be supervising her child's homework after school. Another person might be taking a quick nap. However, considering the cost savings, it's acceptable to give them this flexibility and overlook these minor issues.
Regarding productivity in office work—employees often take extended tea or lunch breaks, engage in long conversations in person or over the phone, have smoke breaks, or spend time on social media.
By the way, what is the productivity of those working in the office? There are extended tea or lunch breaks, long chats either in person or on the telephone, etc. Secondly, what about smoke breaks or engagement with "social media"?
Best regards,
Dinesh V Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
You have written, "A couple of them are abusing this privilege by applying to work from home whenever they have some personal challenge."
We need clarification here. What do you mean by "abusing"?
"Work from home" is a facility provided to employees whose targets are well defined. The amount of work they need to complete in a specific time frame is determined. Certain tasks do not require personal interaction with other departments. Many things can be managed through telephone, email, etc., and this work from home facility is only given to those employees. So, where does the issue of "abusing the facility" arise?
Organizations are implementing "work from home" to save on electricity, water consumption, and more. Some organizations even encourage employees to work from home exclusively, as stated in their appointment letters.
Every situation has its downside. For instance, a female employee working from home may be supervising her child's homework after school. Another person might be taking a quick nap. However, considering the cost savings, it's acceptable to give them this flexibility and overlook these minor issues.
Regarding productivity in office work—employees often take extended tea or lunch breaks, engage in long conversations in person or over the phone, have smoke breaks, or spend time on social media.
By the way, what is the productivity of those working in the office? There are extended tea or lunch breaks, long chats either in person or on the telephone, etc. Secondly, what about smoke breaks or engagement with "social media"?
Best regards,
Dinesh V Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Ashok,
We understand it's the people who are close to power centers whom you are trying to bring to book. There are numerous measures for working from home; however, none of them may work for you. Please observe and discuss with the reporting managers of these people on what measures should be taken.
There are tons of tracking software, but that may not provide you with any solution as the job content can be beyond the scope of those software programs. Accountability to their jobs can be best explained by their reporting leaders. Call for a KRA review and identify the changes in the deliverables. Find measures and attach rankings or scores to them.
At the end of the day, keep it human, as it remains a benefit more than a work arrangement. Telecommuting offers a lower salary as the freedom to perform is higher. Build a new scorecard for these employees. Trust, that should help.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
We understand it's the people who are close to power centers whom you are trying to bring to book. There are numerous measures for working from home; however, none of them may work for you. Please observe and discuss with the reporting managers of these people on what measures should be taken.
There are tons of tracking software, but that may not provide you with any solution as the job content can be beyond the scope of those software programs. Accountability to their jobs can be best explained by their reporting leaders. Call for a KRA review and identify the changes in the deliverables. Find measures and attach rankings or scores to them.
At the end of the day, keep it human, as it remains a benefit more than a work arrangement. Telecommuting offers a lower salary as the freedom to perform is higher. Build a new scorecard for these employees. Trust, that should help.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hello Ashok,
While concurring with both Dinesh and (Cite Contribution), there's another aspect of the whole HR perspective that you may need to consider. The concept/practice of 'work from home' essentially came into being to make HR policies more flexible, while ensuring that the work gets done and both the employee and the organization benefit – a sort of win-win situation.
Now, you wish to, in a way, 'take the clock backwards'. Rather than focusing on whether the guy is 'abusing' the facility or not (whose definition, as Dinesh pointed out, could vary from person to person), suggest if the work/target/deadline is being affected. If not, just forget it. Having said this, if at all you wish to tweak the practice a bit in your company, suggest speaking to the Reporting Managers and tightening the targets a bit.
Regards,
TS
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
While concurring with both Dinesh and (Cite Contribution), there's another aspect of the whole HR perspective that you may need to consider. The concept/practice of 'work from home' essentially came into being to make HR policies more flexible, while ensuring that the work gets done and both the employee and the organization benefit – a sort of win-win situation.
Now, you wish to, in a way, 'take the clock backwards'. Rather than focusing on whether the guy is 'abusing' the facility or not (whose definition, as Dinesh pointed out, could vary from person to person), suggest if the work/target/deadline is being affected. If not, just forget it. Having said this, if at all you wish to tweak the practice a bit in your company, suggest speaking to the Reporting Managers and tightening the targets a bit.
Regards,
TS
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
There are basic premises behind any work policy. You have used the term "abusing." I don't know what you mean by that. Gone are the days where the supervisor looks over the shoulder of the subordinate every 5 minutes and decides (judges) whether the employee is performing or not. Today, the whole concept of employee performance has shifted from tracking inputs using terms such as obedient, hardworking, and sincere worker, dedicated employee... (whatever it meant earlier) to tracking performance on clearly defined and transparent performance indicators.
In such a situation, there is nothing like abusing the facility, as it is irrelevant to the company what, when, and how he does his work, so long as the defined performance metrics are achieved and not rewarded based on a defined performance-based reward system.
Regarding the employee using emails to seek other jobs, I honestly, firmly, and sincerely believe that you shouldn't waste your time, energy, and peace of mind by getting into these irrelevant matters, as the employee has the absolute right to seek other jobs. Even if he were to sit in your office where you block access to employment sites, in this open world, he can do what he wants from his internet connection or other means after office hours.
So, I tend to agree with Dinesh (Cite Contribution) and others above. Get the idea of someone abusing positions, WFH facilities, etc., out of your head and try to understand if your employee has any real issues, why he is looking elsewhere. You will be better off. Today, we are in a situation where your objective is to attract and retain your team, not coerce them into your ways. It just won't work.
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In such a situation, there is nothing like abusing the facility, as it is irrelevant to the company what, when, and how he does his work, so long as the defined performance metrics are achieved and not rewarded based on a defined performance-based reward system.
Regarding the employee using emails to seek other jobs, I honestly, firmly, and sincerely believe that you shouldn't waste your time, energy, and peace of mind by getting into these irrelevant matters, as the employee has the absolute right to seek other jobs. Even if he were to sit in your office where you block access to employment sites, in this open world, he can do what he wants from his internet connection or other means after office hours.
So, I tend to agree with Dinesh (Cite Contribution) and others above. Get the idea of someone abusing positions, WFH facilities, etc., out of your head and try to understand if your employee has any real issues, why he is looking elsewhere. You will be better off. Today, we are in a situation where your objective is to attract and retain your team, not coerce them into your ways. It just won't work.
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Dinesh,
Very well said. You hit the nail spot on. If the option itself says 'Work from Home', why bother how they use it, as long as the work they are responsible/accountable for gets done on time. Else, it gets questioned by default.
From Denmark, Copenhagen
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Very well said. You hit the nail spot on. If the option itself says 'Work from Home', why bother how they use it, as long as the work they are responsible/accountable for gets done on time. Else, it gets questioned by default.
From Denmark, Copenhagen
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear ASHOK,
You should not worry about the employees applying to work from home as long as their performance does not affect your business. If it does, then you need to think of a solution. If the target is completed, then why worry? Ensure that you give them a target and ask them to report every evening at the closing time.
See if it works for you.
Satish
9545391074
From India, Vasco Da Gama
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
You should not worry about the employees applying to work from home as long as their performance does not affect your business. If it does, then you need to think of a solution. If the target is completed, then why worry? Ensure that you give them a target and ask them to report every evening at the closing time.
See if it works for you.
Satish
9545391074
From India, Vasco Da Gama
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Ashok, They can fill in the time sheets and report what have done for the time allotted. This would be one way of tracking them. And of course the deadlines Asha
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Ashok,
Others have given you very good ideas; hence, let me ask a few questions before giving some examples.
Have the line managers of these employees complained about their performance? If not, how do you know that they are misusing the facility?
I have worked in academia in two types of institutions: a college where the teaching staff is expected to be on the premises five days a week from 9 till 5, whether they have classes to take or not, and a university where we had to be present when we had classes and attend meetings, counsel students, etc. In the latter, when I have informed the office that I would be working from home, they have been very apologetic when they have phoned me for advice. I, in my part, have corresponded with students by email and given guidance about their projects, even when on vacation in India.
Similarly, when people are dealing with individuals in different time zones, flexibility and honesty are key. If the managers are not complaining, then why bother?
From United Kingdom
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Others have given you very good ideas; hence, let me ask a few questions before giving some examples.
Have the line managers of these employees complained about their performance? If not, how do you know that they are misusing the facility?
I have worked in academia in two types of institutions: a college where the teaching staff is expected to be on the premises five days a week from 9 till 5, whether they have classes to take or not, and a university where we had to be present when we had classes and attend meetings, counsel students, etc. In the latter, when I have informed the office that I would be working from home, they have been very apologetic when they have phoned me for advice. I, in my part, have corresponded with students by email and given guidance about their projects, even when on vacation in India.
Similarly, when people are dealing with individuals in different time zones, flexibility and honesty are key. If the managers are not complaining, then why bother?
From United Kingdom
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
When you don't have a process to set measurable goals and track performance of individuals, when the HR perceptions are that the people working from home tend to enjoy life, when you refuse to understand concepts such as 'virtual office', and when you are merely looking for ways and means to fix some people, you tend to focus on those employees who have been permitted to work from home and occasionally label them as 'abusing a privilege'. You fail to realize that this privilege was forced on them because of your own compulsions to provide work benches and Admin support during odd timings in a day. The financial overheads were probably unaffordable to make them work from an office.
Therefore, please put your processes in place on how to make them accountable on job performance parameters (viz, targets/KPIs for each goal/task/KRA). And if you can't do that because of the lack of maturity of your monitoring and control processes, think twice before doubting the integrity of people. Remember that people, in general, enjoy doing their work, provided their managers know how to extract work out of them.
To my mind, therefore, it is your system's failure if someone is truly 'abusing a privilege'.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Therefore, please put your processes in place on how to make them accountable on job performance parameters (viz, targets/KPIs for each goal/task/KRA). And if you can't do that because of the lack of maturity of your monitoring and control processes, think twice before doubting the integrity of people. Remember that people, in general, enjoy doing their work, provided their managers know how to extract work out of them.
To my mind, therefore, it is your system's failure if someone is truly 'abusing a privilege'.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I agree with the majority of seniors who have given their views.
It seems to be the typical notion of HRs, who feel if the employee is "having fun," it is time to bring them to book!!
"A couple of them are abusing this privilege by applying to work from home whenever they have some personal challenge." If it's only a couple of employees; why have a "a proper work from home policy that can curtail such abuses"; which will affect ALL such employees, who are not "abusing" it??
Moreover, "abuse" itself is subjective here.
Another pertinent question is: Are there not people who are responsible for monitoring their performance?? Their reporting heads/superiors?? What about their Performance Appraisals; Tasks/Targets??
Is it necessary for HR to initiate suo moto action in case of employees dealing in technical assignments, without any complaints from their reporting officers about their performance issues??
Should HR be involved in such matters which pertain to other functional areas and domains??
I think the responses from our esteemed members also answer these questions without them being asked.
Warm regards.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
It seems to be the typical notion of HRs, who feel if the employee is "having fun," it is time to bring them to book!!
"A couple of them are abusing this privilege by applying to work from home whenever they have some personal challenge." If it's only a couple of employees; why have a "a proper work from home policy that can curtail such abuses"; which will affect ALL such employees, who are not "abusing" it??
Moreover, "abuse" itself is subjective here.
Another pertinent question is: Are there not people who are responsible for monitoring their performance?? Their reporting heads/superiors?? What about their Performance Appraisals; Tasks/Targets??
Is it necessary for HR to initiate suo moto action in case of employees dealing in technical assignments, without any complaints from their reporting officers about their performance issues??
Should HR be involved in such matters which pertain to other functional areas and domains??
I think the responses from our esteemed members also answer these questions without them being asked.
Warm regards.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi Members,
I am overwhelmed by your feedback and appreciate it. Thank you! As one of my colleagues mentioned, everything can be tracked, monitored, and deliverables measured. What I want to curb is - some employees close to power centers based abroad use this privilege to catch up on personal work or even go out to other job interviews. A classic example was when an employee 'working from home,' supposed to be handling clients in the APAC region, bumped into another employee who had taken the day off to attend the same interview. Officially, the first employee was working from home and attending to clients, and mobile technology today can allow WebEx meetings to be held from a coffee shop. We do not have a proper documented policy in place.
Thanks in advance,
Ashok
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I am overwhelmed by your feedback and appreciate it. Thank you! As one of my colleagues mentioned, everything can be tracked, monitored, and deliverables measured. What I want to curb is - some employees close to power centers based abroad use this privilege to catch up on personal work or even go out to other job interviews. A classic example was when an employee 'working from home,' supposed to be handling clients in the APAC region, bumped into another employee who had taken the day off to attend the same interview. Officially, the first employee was working from home and attending to clients, and mobile technology today can allow WebEx meetings to be held from a coffee shop. We do not have a proper documented policy in place.
Thanks in advance,
Ashok
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Ashok,
You have rightly identified the flaw in the system; hence, design the policy for it. A request, please don't make any individual a focus of this initiative. It might unnecessarily create obstacles for you. Stay focused on designing the HR Systems for the emerging Business Processes.
You will find tons of policies in this community to refer to and understand how they are structured. Here are a few points to consider while framing the policy: [Work from home](https://www.citehr.com/443023-work-home-policy-how-why-frame.html).
When you design the policy for your firm, please pre-wire all the current and future challenges. Right now, the bosses in the US are not raising any questions. God forbid, if these talents leave, creating a dent in the benefits offered to them, it will hurt the employees who are yet to avail of it.
Define the benefits to be offered and identify to what extent you will write off the outages. Identify the escalation standards and who would be managing them. Include not just under-performance but also standards for data security. Define what the employee would remain answerable for and to whom. Setting the guidelines will create fewer options for misuse, even if the leaders in the US choose not to intervene.
Please frame the points for KRA review each time an employee shifts into the telecommute mode. Identify the changes in terms of responsibilities that the employees have gone through and will go through within the role.
Here's a very old discussion, but one of the best, I consider, to gain clarity while defining the KRA/KPI for any role: [KRA-KPI Format](https://www.citehr.com/136390-kra-kpi-format.html).
Trust this would help! Wish you all the best!
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
You have rightly identified the flaw in the system; hence, design the policy for it. A request, please don't make any individual a focus of this initiative. It might unnecessarily create obstacles for you. Stay focused on designing the HR Systems for the emerging Business Processes.
You will find tons of policies in this community to refer to and understand how they are structured. Here are a few points to consider while framing the policy: [Work from home](https://www.citehr.com/443023-work-home-policy-how-why-frame.html).
When you design the policy for your firm, please pre-wire all the current and future challenges. Right now, the bosses in the US are not raising any questions. God forbid, if these talents leave, creating a dent in the benefits offered to them, it will hurt the employees who are yet to avail of it.
Define the benefits to be offered and identify to what extent you will write off the outages. Identify the escalation standards and who would be managing them. Include not just under-performance but also standards for data security. Define what the employee would remain answerable for and to whom. Setting the guidelines will create fewer options for misuse, even if the leaders in the US choose not to intervene.
Please frame the points for KRA review each time an employee shifts into the telecommute mode. Identify the changes in terms of responsibilities that the employees have gone through and will go through within the role.
Here's a very old discussion, but one of the best, I consider, to gain clarity while defining the KRA/KPI for any role: [KRA-KPI Format](https://www.citehr.com/136390-kra-kpi-format.html).
Trust this would help! Wish you all the best!
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Gathering data for an AI comment.... Sending emails to relevant members...
Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
Employee reference policy.doc
EMPLOYEE IN THE ORGANIZATION verses PORTRAIT IN THE HOME.pdf