Respected seniors,
This is Ramu working in the manufacturing industry. I need some clarification on WC policy. When we engage contract labor for temporary works, i.e., 3 or 4 months of miscellaneous works, is getting workmen's compensation policy instead of registering under ESIC valid or not?
Is the WC policy valid instead of ESI even if the industry has ESI coverage? Many contractors in our surrounding industries are following this practice. Is it legally valid?
Please provide me with valuable advice on this matter.
With regards,
Ramu
From India, Vijayawada
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
5This is Ramu working in the manufacturing industry. I need some clarification on WC policy. When we engage contract labor for temporary works, i.e., 3 or 4 months of miscellaneous works, is getting workmen's compensation policy instead of registering under ESIC valid or not?
Is the WC policy valid instead of ESI even if the industry has ESI coverage? Many contractors in our surrounding industries are following this practice. Is it legally valid?
Please provide me with valuable advice on this matter.
With regards,
Ramu
From India, Vijayawada
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Ramu,
If the premises where you employ contract labor are covered by the ESI scheme and their wages are below Rs. 15,001 per month, they have to be insured under ESI. If not, the EC Act is applicable if they are employees under Schedule II of the Act. Note that insurance under the EC Act is not mandatory.
Varghese Mathew
09961266966
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
If the premises where you employ contract labor are covered by the ESI scheme and their wages are below Rs. 15,001 per month, they have to be insured under ESI. If not, the EC Act is applicable if they are employees under Schedule II of the Act. Note that insurance under the EC Act is not mandatory.
Varghese Mathew
09961266966
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Ramu,
Since the work is performed at an ESI-covered location, the fact that the work is for a limited period or that the contractor has a Workers' Compensation (WC) Policy does not absolve you of the liability under the ESI Act. Whenever an ESI Inspector comes for verification, they can insist on the payment of contributions for the past period for such contract labor, as it is the Principal Employer's responsibility to ensure this. This is particularly important since the contractor does not have independent ESI registration.
Regards,
KK
From India, Bhopal
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Since the work is performed at an ESI-covered location, the fact that the work is for a limited period or that the contractor has a Workers' Compensation (WC) Policy does not absolve you of the liability under the ESI Act. Whenever an ESI Inspector comes for verification, they can insist on the payment of contributions for the past period for such contract labor, as it is the Principal Employer's responsibility to ensure this. This is particularly important since the contractor does not have independent ESI registration.
Regards,
KK
From India, Bhopal
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Sir,
It is absolutely correct, as mentioned by Sh. KK Nair, that if any industry is covered by ESIC, the contractor's employees will also be required to be covered under ESIC irrespective of the period of his contract. The ESIC Inspector, during his inspection, will certainly ask for the payment of contributions in respect of such contractors for the period of inspection in spite of having their WC Policy.
Regards,
RKB
From India, Gandhidham
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
0
0
It is absolutely correct, as mentioned by Sh. KK Nair, that if any industry is covered by ESIC, the contractor's employees will also be required to be covered under ESIC irrespective of the period of his contract. The ESIC Inspector, during his inspection, will certainly ask for the payment of contributions in respect of such contractors for the period of inspection in spite of having their WC Policy.
Regards,
RKB
From India, Gandhidham
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The user reply is correct. ESIC coverage is mandatory for contract labor in industries covered by ESIC, regardless of the contract period. Inspectors can enforce this requirement. Thank you for sharing your insights. (1 Acknowledge point)
0
0
Dear Friend,
Please note that WC Insurance is not a substitute for ESI. Where employees are to be covered under ESI, they must be covered. WC insurance is only useful where employees are not covered under ESI, though not mandatory.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(1)
Amend(0)
Please note that WC Insurance is not a substitute for ESI. Where employees are to be covered under ESI, they must be covered. WC insurance is only useful where employees are not covered under ESI, though not mandatory.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)Gathering data for an AI comment.... Sending emails to relevant members...
Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
Legal Compliance Plan.xls
CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The user reply is correct. It accurately states that having a Workmen's Compensation (WC) policy does not absolve the liability under the ESI Act for principal employers when engaging contract labor in an ESI-covered location. The Principal Employer is still responsible for ESI contributions. Well explained. (1 Acknowledge point)