Hi Experts,
If a company has a notice period of 3 months and the candidate is seeking an earlier release, is the company legally capable of forcing the candidate to work for the full 3-month notice period? In other words, can the company refuse a buyout offer from the candidate and insist on the full 3 months' notice period?
Regards,
Rocky.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
If a company has a notice period of 3 months and the candidate is seeking an earlier release, is the company legally capable of forcing the candidate to work for the full 3-month notice period? In other words, can the company refuse a buyout offer from the candidate and insist on the full 3 months' notice period?
Regards,
Rocky.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The employee can very well pay 3 months' notice pay as per the appointment clause and walk out of the company. However, it depends on the task that the employee is working on. For example, as a project manager, if he is the only one who knows complete details of an important task and it's not possible to hire a new manager within a short span and explain the work from the beginning, then surely the company can force the employee to work until the assigned task is accomplished.
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
22From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Nisha , I agree with you,, but legally is it possible to compell a candidate to stay pack for 3 months,,,,!!
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Legal Notice for Breach of Notice Period .docx