Can an employer change the basic component of the salary? For example, if my salary structure is defined such that the basic is 50% of the total gross salary for the last 4 years, can my company change it to 35% of the gross without my approval?
Thank you.
From India, Pune
Thank you.
From India, Pune
employer has the right to change the basic as long as your gross does not get reduced or affected.
From India, Lucknow
From India, Lucknow
Thanks, borntosin and pon.
I discussed this with experts (a C.A. and a lawyer) and concluded that it depends on the company. If it is a public limited company, then one can take action; but when it is a private limited company, there is no hope to fight unless the offer letter (or last signed bond) has any details of the salary structure.
Thanks & regards,
Sachin.
From India, Pune
I discussed this with experts (a C.A. and a lawyer) and concluded that it depends on the company. If it is a public limited company, then one can take action; but when it is a private limited company, there is no hope to fight unless the offer letter (or last signed bond) has any details of the salary structure.
Thanks & regards,
Sachin.
From India, Pune
I do agree with Sachin; it absolutely depends on company policy. There is no statutory obligation in this regard. Actually, a higher basic salary is always very useful to employees for statutory obligations. For example, if the basic salary is on the higher side, employees can get more HRA exemption as per the IT Act when calculating their tax liability. P.F. contributions depend on Basic Pay, and Gratuity payment also depends on the basic salary. In any case, to conclude, this absolutely depends on company policy.
From India, Hyderabad
From India, Hyderabad
Company not change in Basic Salary structure because Pf contribution increase time to time but not decrease
From India, Delhi
From India, Delhi
Hi,
I agree with Balwant. You cannot reduce the basic component as it would affect the PF contribution. As per the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, the employer cannot reduce the PF contribution, and hence the basic salary cannot be decreased.
Regards,
Smita
I agree with Balwant. You cannot reduce the basic component as it would affect the PF contribution. As per the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, the employer cannot reduce the PF contribution, and hence the basic salary cannot be decreased.
Regards,
Smita
Hi,
I feel the company can always change the base salary and adjust the DA to ensure the PF contribution remains unaffected. However, there are several allowances/benefits linked to the base salary that may be impacted by this change.
Regards,
Shrinivas
From India, Mumbai
I feel the company can always change the base salary and adjust the DA to ensure the PF contribution remains unaffected. However, there are several allowances/benefits linked to the base salary that may be impacted by this change.
Regards,
Shrinivas
From India, Mumbai
Dear Sir,
Mohan has worked for 8 years in a company, and his basic salary was Rs. 25,000. After 6 years, they reduced his basic salary to Rs. 18,000, although his gross salary remained the same. Now, after 8 years, Mohan has resigned and smoothly handed over his responsibilities. On which basis salary will he get his gratuity?
Thank you.
From India, Mumbai
Mohan has worked for 8 years in a company, and his basic salary was Rs. 25,000. After 6 years, they reduced his basic salary to Rs. 18,000, although his gross salary remained the same. Now, after 8 years, Mohan has resigned and smoothly handed over his responsibilities. On which basis salary will he get his gratuity?
Thank you.
From India, Mumbai
Employer have rights to reduce the basic wages but should not violate any provision under minimum wage act ...... Hekarthi ....
From India, Coimbatore
From India, Coimbatore
Legal Constraints on Changing Employment Terms
No employer can legally change the terms of service conditions stated in the offer letter/appointment letter, as it contains clauses that define the agreed terms of employment for both the employer and employee. Once the offer letter has been signed by both parties, no changes can be made without the mutual consent of the employee and employer, as per Section 9A of the ID Act. Any changes affecting workers, such as shifts, working hours, or service conditions, must be notified at least 21 days in advance to every worker before implementation.
Please refer to the case of T Rajamanickam v/s Binny Limited, where the Honorable Madras High Court ruled that reducing a worker's emolument without prior notice, contrary to the settlement between the management and workers, violates Section 9A of the ID Act.
Therefore, changes cannot be made without providing notice to workers or without the mutual consent of the employee.
Thanks and regards,
V. Shakya
HR and Labor Law Advisor
From India, Agra
No employer can legally change the terms of service conditions stated in the offer letter/appointment letter, as it contains clauses that define the agreed terms of employment for both the employer and employee. Once the offer letter has been signed by both parties, no changes can be made without the mutual consent of the employee and employer, as per Section 9A of the ID Act. Any changes affecting workers, such as shifts, working hours, or service conditions, must be notified at least 21 days in advance to every worker before implementation.
Please refer to the case of T Rajamanickam v/s Binny Limited, where the Honorable Madras High Court ruled that reducing a worker's emolument without prior notice, contrary to the settlement between the management and workers, violates Section 9A of the ID Act.
Therefore, changes cannot be made without providing notice to workers or without the mutual consent of the employee.
Thanks and regards,
V. Shakya
HR and Labor Law Advisor
From India, Agra
Unilateral Changes to Employee Salary
A suo moto change made by any employer to the salary of their employees, whether structurally or otherwise, in violation of the terms of the employment contract, is neither legally nor morally correct. The legal repercussions of such changes to the agreed salary depend on the class of employees likely to be affected. In my opinion, the constitution of the establishment is immaterial in this matter of unilateral change or modification of the terms of the employment contract to the disadvantage of the employees.
From India, Salem
A suo moto change made by any employer to the salary of their employees, whether structurally or otherwise, in violation of the terms of the employment contract, is neither legally nor morally correct. The legal repercussions of such changes to the agreed salary depend on the class of employees likely to be affected. In my opinion, the constitution of the establishment is immaterial in this matter of unilateral change or modification of the terms of the employment contract to the disadvantage of the employees.
From India, Salem
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.