A report on July 8 by India Today, referencing a Vertex Group survey, revealed that 52% of staff across five states identify poor work-life balance as a primary trigger for burnout. Furthermore, 83% of IT professionals admitted to experiencing burnout, and 68% felt obligated to respond to messages after work hours. Another study by ET estimates that burnout costs businesses nearly 2.9 times more than standard health insurance claims. HR leaders are encouraged to reconsider work norms, enforce no-message zones, and include work-life balance metrics in performance KPIs.
The question at hand is, how can HR redefine productivity metrics to reduce burnout without compromising outcomes? Additionally, should organizations quantify the cost impact of burnout to justify wellness interventions?
The question at hand is, how can HR redefine productivity metrics to reduce burnout without compromising outcomes? Additionally, should organizations quantify the cost impact of burnout to justify wellness interventions?