Before you even think about talking to the participants, you need to examine the meeting itself.
The Nature of Meetings
By definition, almost all meetings are boring. If we were to do a quick poll of CiteHR members, we would find the overwhelming majority would say meetings are boring, unnecessary most of the time, time-wasting, and achieve nothing.
Questions to Consider
So your starting point is to answer questions such as:
- Why do we have this meeting?
- Why is it necessary to have this meeting?
- Can we impart information to participants in a different way?
- Is someone demanding this meeting just to make themselves important?
- Does this meeting achieve anything—does it move the company forward, and does it have identifiable and measurable outcomes?
- Are there minutes kept with action points, and are those actions followed up to ensure completion?
- Does this meeting just waste everybody's valuable time, and nothing is achieved?
- How many participants are fiddling with their phones and not taking any notice of what is being said?
- How many participants find reasons, spurious or otherwise, not to attend the meeting?
Suggestions for Improvement
My suggestion is that for your meeting next week:
- You have a very tight agenda limited only to important matters that need discussion.
- You have a time limit and you do not go one minute over—respect other people's time.
- You have a chairperson who can control the meeting and keep it on track.
- All unimportant matters and information-only items are circulated in an email.
Does This Work?
Yes, it does. I did it continuously during my working career. I hate meetings with a passion and I freely admit that. They waste time, sap people's energy, cause resentment, and for the most part achieve nothing. And that is not to mention the useless, time-wasting PowerPoint presentations with boring people droning on and on just reading the words on their slides.
When you have fixed all those problems, then talk to your staff to refine the process.