Dear Sunakshi,
Do you mean to say that after conducting the Performance Appraisal (PA), a salary hike will be given to the employee, and because of the salary hike, the employee cannot leave the company for one year?
It may be noted that Performance Appraisal (PA) and the annual salary increment, though related, are two distinct terms. Therefore, these cannot be used interchangeably.
Now coming to your query. It appears that employees leave the company even after receiving an annual salary increment. To curb their exit, you wish to make a trade-off: take an annual increment but stay compulsorily for a year. Though such conditions are tempting for the employer, their legal validity is questionable. Under the provisions of which act can you introduce this condition?
PA is conducted to measure the work done in the past. The salary increment is a recognition of that. The organization should recognize the work, whether the employee stays with the company in the future or not. In the case at hand, your organization demands that not only should the employee render a desired level of performance, but over and above, he/she must stay in the organization also.
If you introduce a sentence of compulsory employment in the company for a year, then two issues will arise. One is what if the employee quits before one year? Will you ask the employee to refund the amount already disbursed? Secondly, what if the employee wants the freedom of choosing his career opportunities outside your organization and is ready to forego the annual salary increment?
Therefore, before initiating the whole thing, I recommend you consult a lawyer who handles cases under the Indian Contract Act and take his/her opinion.
From the HR Management point of view, the case needs to be seen with due sensitivity. This condition could demotivate the employees. In that case, what will be the cost of demotivation? Will it be lesser or more than the total cost of the salary increment?
Employees work in the company when they are convinced that their intellectual growth takes place. They also work when they feel that they are learning something new in the company. However, the condition that you are proposing will put a focus only on the money. It will set off a culture of trade-off, and it is not good for the organization in the long run.
Final comments: While you have asked for help in drafting a sentence in the post-PA letter issued to the employee, I have given a long post. It may sound like an unwanted lecture to you; nevertheless, it may be noted that the posts on a public forum are bound to come under public scrutiny. The essence of these forums lies in questioning and debating, and not obediently fulfilling the requirement of a fellow member.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar