Dear Sankara, In what capacity have you written this post? Are you the employee in question who had asked for a long leave, or are you from the HR Department and referring to an employee from your company? Is it that you are a third party witnessing this incident?
The employee had asked for a long leave, and it was agreed to by the employer. The approval of the leave application, even without pay, is nothing but a commitment to continuity in employment. Now, why does the employer wish to back out? In that case, why did the employer approve the leave at all? The applicant could have been told to submit a resignation and could have been informed that his rejoining would be conditional or considered later. Clear communication is a prerequisite to maintaining the proper culture in an organization.
Employers are expected to be firm while making decisions. If the employer has changed stance after six months, then it shows his/her fickle-mindedness. Therefore, is it worthwhile to rejoin such a company? Why not avail of the better opportunity? Though the employee was without pay, his continuation has increased the length of his employment in the company. Why not take benefit of it?
Merits and Demerits of Rejoining the Company
a) If the employee rejoins, there will be a break in his/her career. Whether the employee joins the same company or any other, while availing of future opportunities, he/she will have to explain the reasons for the break.
b) If the employee rejoins, and if he/she is eligible, then he/she may apply for the payment of gratuity for his/her past tenure. However, to become eligible for the gratuity again, he will have to serve at least five years. In case the employer does not pay the gratuity, then the employee must obtain proper confirmation for considering the service even before the break.
c) If the employee rejoins, he could lose the seniority for the promotion, etc. The employer may or may not consider his past tenure.
d) If the employee rejoins, then he/she will have to carry a burden of favor by the employer. The employer could expect the employee to be indebted and might even take undue advantage of it.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar