Dear Colleague,
Non-Compete Disclosure: Challenges
A very good discussion and a very important point that HR has to handle very tactfully. The business will pressure HR to handle such cases as talents directly go and join competitors, pulling the business down.
It is a tough situation for HR professionals to satisfy the business leaders on one side and talents on the other side, navigating through the legal systems prevailing. The non-compete agreements, as replied by our colleagues, will not be seen favorably in the eyes of the law. Best retention is the main strategy here, and we also know how difficult it is for all of us to retain talent. This challenge is universal.
Ways Forward in This Complexity
1. Talents Who Have Already Left
Regarding full and final settlement, it is not correct to withhold any dues but to settle with the talents who have left with a letter stating that he/she shall not disclose any company confidential business data in an advisory tone. If any violations are noticed, they will be dealt with appropriately. This may not help much legally, but it communicates morally that sharing company details is not fair. Also, ensure that all digital data is collected back/erased from the talents before settling.
2. For Existing and New Talents Who Will Join in the Future
Even though the courts view non-compete agreements unfavorably, it is suggested:
a) Share and get agreement on the non-compete agreement during the hiring process. If the talent is selected, execute the agreement during onboarding alongside the appointment order terms. This will make the company's communication clear. Ensure to have a legally well-drafted non-compete agreement obtained from a reputable advocate.
b) Exclude the non-compete clause in the appointment order terms, as courts typically view job seekers as in a weaker position. However, have a separate non-compete agreement that mentions potential civil breaches if the talent joins a competitor directly. From the employer's perspective, this creates a moral binding, even though there is less legal support for such agreements.
c) From the employee's viewpoint, they may feel they have the fundamental right to join any employer of their choice. However, by making communication clear and executing a fair agreement, the employee will have moral obligations, and the employer can pursue civil proceedings if needed. Yet, such legal actions could harm the organization's reputation and hinder attracting future talent.
In Summary
1. Settle with an official letter as stated in Para 1, instead of withholding dues.
2. Clearly communicate the non-compete disclosure agreement from the initial hiring process.
3. Keep appointment order and non-compete clause as separate documentation, signed by both parties.
4. Retrieve data from the talent before settling, and implement IT controls to prevent data leakage.
5. Use this for moral obligations, not to handle employees harshly upon leaving.
6. Strengthen retention processes/strategies.
7. Consider clauses like performance bonus or incentive in the appointment order, tying disbursement to KPI fulfillment and non-competition.
Thank you to colleagues who provided valuable insights on this subject.
Best wishes,
Dr. P. Sivakumar
Dr. SIVAGLOBALHR
Tamil Nadu